Article Data

  • Views 745
  • Dowloads 136

Original Research

Open Access

Identification of Preferred Healthy Weight Counseling Approaches for Children in the Dental Setting

  • Jiasheng D Guo1
  • William F Vann. Jr1
  • Jessica Y Lee1
  • Michael W Roberts1,*,

1,University of North Carolina School of Dentistry

DOI: 10.17796/1053-4625-42.6.2 Vol.42,Issue 6,November 2018 pp.414-421

Published: 01 November 2018

*Corresponding Author(s): Michael W Roberts E-mail: Mike_Roberts@unc.edu

Abstract

Objective: There is a gap in the literature regarding optimal methods for the dental team to help address the childhood obesity epidemic; accordingly, this investigation sought to identify preferred communication approaches the dental team can rely upon to initiate dialogue with caregivers regarding the weight of their children. Study Design: A structured interview guide containing seven potential Healthy Weight Counseling (HWC) approaches and eight follow up questions was developed, pilot-tested, revised and utilized as a structured interview guide. Interviews were conducted at the Children's Clinic at the School of Dentistry at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC-CH) with 50 participants who are English-speaking caregivers of children ages 4–12. Results: Ninety-four percent of the participants were receptive to HWC in the dental setting. Caregivers indicated varying levels of acceptance for the seven HWC-approaches based on specific word choices in each approach. Sixty percent preferred HWC to be delivered with the child not present while 34% preferred the child's presence and 6% had no preference. Conclusions: Caregivers were open to weight-related conversations in the dental setting but to be well received, the dental team must choose their approach carefully and establish the proper doctor/patient relationship prior to HWC delivery. An individualized HWC-approach tailored to the specific needs of each family is indicated.

Keywords

childhood obesity, healthy-weight counseling, dentists, caregivers, dental education, parental perceptions

Cite and Share

Jiasheng D Guo,William F Vann. Jr,Jessica Y Lee,Michael W Roberts. Identification of Preferred Healthy Weight Counseling Approaches for Children in the Dental Setting. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2018. 42(6);414-421.

References

1. Ogden C, Lawman H, Fryar C, Kruszon-Moran D, Kit B, and Flegal K . Trends in obesity prevalence among children and adolescents in the United States, 1988-1994 through 2013-2014. JAMA; 21: 2293-2299. 2016.

2. Freedman DS, Mei Z, Srinivasan SR, Berenson GS, Dietz WH. Cardiovascular risk factors and excess adiposity among overweight children and adolescents: the Bogalusa Heart Study. J Pediatr; 150(1): 12-17.e2. 2007.

3. Dietz William H. Health consequences of obesity in youth: Childhood predictors of adult disease. Pediatrics; 101(2): 518-525. 1998.

4. Morrison KM, Shin S, Tarnopolsky M, Taylor VH. Association of depression and health related quality of life with body composition in children and youth with obesity. Journal Affective Disorders; 172: 18-23. 2015.

5. Healthy People 2020. Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity. https://www. healthypeople.gov/2020/leading-health-indicators/2020-lhi-topics/Nutrition- Physical-Activity-and-Obesity/data. Accessed December 28, 2016.

6. Hansen A, Duncan D, Tarasenko Y, Yan F, Zhang J. Generational Shift in Parental Perceptions of Overweight Among School-Aged Children. Pediatrics; 134: 481-488. 2014.

7. He M, Evans A. Are parents aware that their children are overweight or obese? Do they care? Canadian Family Physician; 53: 1493-1499. 2007.

8. Glick, M. A concern that cannot weight. JADA; 136: 572-573. 2005.

9. Vann WF Jr, Bouwens TJ, Braithwaite AS, Lee JY. The childhood obesity epidemic: a role for pediatric dentists? Pediatr Dent; 27(4): 271-276. 2005.

10. Tseng R, Vann WF, Perrin E. Addressing childhood overweight and obesity in the dental office: Rationale and practical guidelines. Pediatr Dent; 32: 417–423. 2010.

11. Greenberg B, Thomas P, Glick M, Kantor M. Physicians’ attitudes toward medical screening in a dental setting. J Public Health Dent; 75:225-233. doi: 10.1111/jphd.12093. Epub 2015 Mar 11. 2015.

12. Greenberg B, Kantor M, Jiang S, Glick M. Patients’ attitudes toward screening for medical conditions in a dental setting. J Public Health Dent, 2012; 72:28-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2011.00280.x. Epub 2011 Oct 10.

13. Tavares M and Chomitz V. A healthy weight intervention for children in a dental setting. J Am Dent Assoc,; 140: 313–316. 2009

14. Curran A, Caplan D, Lee, JY, Paynter L, Gizlice Z, Champagne C, Ammerman A, Agans R. Dentists’ attitudes about their role in addressing obesity in patients : A national survey. J Am Dent Assoc ; 141:1307-1316. 2010.

15. Lee JY, Caplan DJ, Gizlice Z, Ammerman A, Agans R, Curran AE. US pediatric dentists’ counseling practices in addressing childhood obesity. Pediatr Dent, 2012; 34: 245-250.

16. Swinney FV, Vann WF jr, Mihas P Burgette JH, Ammerman A, Lee JY. Caregivers perceptions about discussing children’s weight: A pilot study. Dent Open J; 2: 2(2): 47-54. 2015.

17. McHugh ML. The Chi-square test of independence. Biochemia Medica, 2013; 23(2): 143–9.

18. Ziegler J, Hughes CV. Weighing in on pediatric obesity. JADA; 147: 146–150. 2016.

19. Golan M, Crow S. Parents Are Key Players in the Prevention and Treatment of Weight-related Problems. Nutr Rev; 62 (1): 39-50. 2004.

20. Fowler-Brown A, Kahwati LC. Prevention and treatment of overweight in children and adolescents. American Family Physician; 69: 2591-98. 2004. 21. Yuan JC, Lee DJ, Afshari FS, Galang MT, Sukotjo C. Dentistry and obesity: a review and current status in U.S. predoctoral dental education. J Dent Educ; 76: 1129-1136. 2012.

22. Hisaw T, Kerins C, McWhorter AG, Seale NS. Pediatric obesity curriculum in pediatric dental residency programs. Pediatr Dent; 31:486-491. 2009.

23. Werner SL, Phillips C, Koroluk LD. Association between childhood obesity and dental caries. Pediatr Dent; 34: 23-27. 2012.

24. Spiegel KA, Palmer CA. Childhood dental caries and childhood obesity. Different problems with overlapping causes. Am J Dent; 25 (Feb): 59-64. 2012.

25. Lasater G, Piernas C, Popkin BM. Beverage patterns and trends among school-aged children in the US, 1989-2008. Nutr J; 10: 103. 2011.

26. Sandelowski M. Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing & Health; 23: 334-340. 2000.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 1.8 (2023) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top