Article Data

  • Views 2317
  • Dowloads 554

Original Research

Open Access

Newer Technique of Extra-Coronal Bleaching with Sodium Perborate on Non-Pitted Fluorosis Stains in Permanent Anterior Teeth

  • Ruchi Singhal1,*,
  • Ritu Namdev1
  • Parul Singhal1
  • Nisha Rajput1
  • Saurabh Narang1

1Department of Pedodontics, PGIDS, Rohtak, India

DOI: 10.17796/1053-4625-46.2.4 Vol.46,Issue 2,March 2022 pp.112-118

Published: 01 March 2022

*Corresponding Author(s): Ruchi Singhal E-mail: singhal84.ruchi@gmail.com

Abstract

Variety of treatment approaches have been proposed for esthetic management of dental fluorosis. Microabrasion, bleaching using hydrogen peroxide, and etch bleach seal are commonly used methods. Bleaching using sodium perborate has been used for intracoronal bleaching. Till now, no study has used sodium perborate for extracoronal bleaching of discolored stained teeth. Objectives: To evaluate the esthetic improvement of non-pitted fluorosis stains using sodium perborate and compare with etch bleach seal, microabrasion and in-office bleaching with 30% H2O2 on visual assessment scale VAS (primary objective) and to assess any untoward effects including staining, sensitivity, gingival problems within the course of study (secondary objectives). Study design: A randomized control trial with 6 months follow up. Methodology- Twenty children aged 8 to 12 years with non-pitted fluorosis in upper anterior teeth were divided into 4 groups with 5 patients in each group. Results and discussion: All of the techniques showed improvement in esthetics with VAS. However, microabrasion and bleaching using sodium perborate had significantly better results than other 2 techniques. Conclusion: Sodium perborate showed excellent results in extracoronal bleaching of fluorosed teeth. However a randomized study with large sample size is required to draw a definitive conclusion regarding superiority of one technique over others.

Keywords

Dental fluorosis; Bleaching; Sodium perborate; Microabrasion; Etch bleach seal

Cite and Share

Ruchi Singhal,Ritu Namdev,Parul Singhal,Nisha Rajput,Saurabh Narang. Newer Technique of Extra-Coronal Bleaching with Sodium Perborate on Non-Pitted Fluorosis Stains in Permanent Anterior Teeth. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2022. 46(2);112-118.

References

1. Gupta A, Dhingra R, Chaudhuri P and Gupta A. A comparison of various minimally invasive techniques for the removal of dental fluorosis stains in children. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent , 2017; 35:260-8.

2. Rozier RG. Epidemiologic indices for measuring the clinical manifestations of dental fluorosis: overview and critique. Adv Dent Res, 1994; 8(1):39-55, June.

3. Thylstrup A. & Fejerskov O. Clinical appearance of dental fluorosis in permanent teeth in relation to histologic changes. Community Dent & Oral Epidemiol. , 1978; 6: 315-328.

4. Celik EU, Yildiz G, Yazkan B. Comparison of enamel microabrasion with a combined approach to the esthetic management of fluorosed teeth. Oper Dent, 2013; 38(5):134-143.

5. Sundfeld RH, Sundfeld-Neto D, Machado LS, Franco LM, Fagundes TC, Briso ALF. Microabrasion in tooth enamel discoloration defects: Three cases with long-term follow-ups. J Appl Oral Sci , 2014; 22(4):347-354.

6. Wright JT. The etch-bleach-seal technique for managing stained enamel defects in young permanent incisors. Pediatr Dent , 2002; 24(3):249-252.

7. Flores AC, Reyes HF, Moscoso AG, Castanedo Cázares JP, Pozos Guillén A . Clinical efficacy of 5% sodium hypochlorite for removal of stains caused by dental fluorosis. J Clin Pediatr Dent , 2009; 33(3):187-192.

8. Kno¨sel M, Attin R, Becker K & AT. A randomized CIE L*a*b* evaluation of external bleaching therapy effects on fluorotic enamel stains. Quintessence Int, 2008;39(5) :391-399.

9. Train TE, McWhorter AG, Seale NS, Wilson CF GI. Examination of esthetic improvement and surface alteration following microabrasion in fluorotic human incisors in vivo. Pediatr Dent 18:353-62, 1996.

10. Shahroom NSB, , Geo Mani MR . Interventions in management of dental fluorosis, an endemic disease: A systematic review Nor. J Fam Med Prim Care.8:3108-3113, 2019.

11. Castro KS, de Araújo Ferreira AC, Duarte RM , Sampaio FC. Acceptability, efficacy and safety of two treatment protocols for dental fluorosis: a randomized clinical trial. J Dent 42(8): 938-44, 2014.

12. Sharma H, Sharma DS. Detection of hydroxyl and perhydroxyl radical generation from bleaching agents with nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 41(2):126-134, 2017.

13. Majeed A, Farooq I, Sias R. Grobler and Rossouw RJ. Tooth-Bleaching: A Review of the Efficacy and Adverse Effects of Various Tooth Whitening Products. Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan 25 (12): 891-896, 2015.

14. Junior MT, Rodrigues CA, Bernardes VL, Araujo TSB, Nicoli GA, et al. Dental Bleaching and New Possibilities- Literature Review. Health Sci J Vol.12.No.6:600, 2018.

15. Lewinstein I, Hirschfeld Z, Stabholz IRA. Effect of hydrogen peroxide and sodium perborate on the microhardness of human enamel and dentin. J Endod 20(2): 61-3, 1994.

16. Cvek M, Lindvall A-M. External root resorption following bleaching of pulpless teeth with oxygen peroxide. Endod Dent Traumatol 1:56-60, 1985.

17. Friedman S, Rotstein I, Libfelt H, Stabholz A, Heling I. Incidence of external root resorption and esthetic results in 58 bleached pulpless teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol 4:23-26, 1988.

18. Baratieri LN, Ritter AV, Monteiro S, de Andrada MAC, Vieira LCC. Nonvital tooth bleaching: guidelines for the clinician. Quintessence Int 26:597-608, 1995.

19. Lado EA, Stanley HR, Weisman MI. Cervical resorption in bleached teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 55:78-80, 1983.

20. Ari H ÜM. In vitro comparison of different types of sodium perborate used for intracoronal bleaching of discoloured teeth. Int Endod J 35:433-6, 2002.

21. Weiger R, Kuhn A LC. Radicular penetration of hydrogen peroxide during intracoronal bleaching using various forms of sodium perborate. Int Endod J 27:313-7, 1994.

22. Rotstein I, Zalkind M, Mor C, Tarabeah A, Friedman S. In vitro efficacy of sodium perborate preparations used for intracoronal bleaching of discolored non-vital teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol 7:177-180, 1991.

23. Oliveira DP, Gomes BPFA, Zaia AA, Souza-Filho FJ FC. In vitro assessment of a gel base containing 2% chlorhexidine as a sodium perborate’s vehicle for intracoronal bleaching of discolored teeth. J Endod, 35:672-4, 2006.

24. Kumar D, Singh A, Mukherjee CG, Ahmed A, Singh A, Hasija MK, et al. Clinical efficacy of hydrochloric acid and phosphoric acid in microabrasion technique for the treatment of different severities of dental fluorosis: An in vivo comparison. Endodontology 31:34-9, 2019.

25. Sundfeld RH, Croll TP, Briso AL, de Alexandre RS SND. Considerations about enamel microabrasion after 18 years. Am J Dent 20:67-72, 2007.

26. Sinha S, Vorse KK, Noorani H, Kumaraswamy SP VS, Surappaneni H et al. Microabrasion using 18% hydrochloric acid and 37% phosphoric acid in various degrees of fluorosis – An in vivo comparision. Eur J Esthet Dent 84:54-65, 2013.

27. Nahsan FP, Silva LM, Baseggio W, Franco EB FP, Mondelli RF et al. Conservative approach for a clinical resolution of enamel white spot lesions. Quintessence Int 42:423-6, 2011.

28. Basting RT, Amaral FLB, França FMG, Flório FM. Clinical comparative study of the effectiveness of and tooth sensitivity to 10% and 20% carbamide peroxide home-use and 35% and 38% hydrogen peroxide in-office bleaching materials containing desensitizing agents. Oper Dent. 37(5):464-473, 2012.

29. Moncada G, Sepulveda D, Elphick K, et al. Effects of light activation, agent concentration, and tooth thickness on dental sensitivity after bleaching. Oper Dent 38(5): 467-476, 2013.

30. Croll T, Donly K. Tooth bleaching in children and teens. J Esthet Restor Dent 26(3):147-150, 2014.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 1.8 (2023) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top