Article Data

  • Views 911
  • Dowloads 175

Original Research

Open Access

Anterior Open Bite In 27 Months Old Children after Use of a Novel Pacifier – A Cohort Study

  • Stefan Zimmer1,*,
  • Hanna Zuralski1
  • Mozhgan Bizhang1
  • Thomas Ostermann1
  • Claudia R Barthel1

1Dental School, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany.

DOI: 10.17796/1053-4628-40.4.328 Vol.40,Issue 4,July 2016 pp.328-333

Published: 01 July 2016

*Corresponding Author(s): Stefan Zimmer E-mail: stefan.zimmer@uni-wh.de

Abstract

The aim of the present cohort study was to evaluate the influence of a novel pacifier on the first formation of malocclusion, the anterior open bite in children. Study design: 129 newborn children whose parents had decided to use pacifiers were randomly attributed to two experimental groups (D=Dentistar, n=56, Novatex, Pattensen, Germany; N=NUK, n=73, Mapa, Zeven, Germany). Children (n=42) who did not use a pacifier were not randomized and served as reference (C). Primary outcome was the presence of anterior open bite. It was hypothesized that D would result in lower incidence when compared to N. At the age of 27 months the children were examined with respect to anterior open bite. Fisher’s exact test served to detect significant differences between groups D and N (SPSS 22.0). Results: 121 children with a mean age of 26.7 months were included in the final analysis (D: n=45; N: n=42; C: n=34). In group D three children (6.7%) showed an anterior open bite. The respective values were 21 (50.0%) for N and 0 for C. The results for group D compared to N were significantly different (chi²-test, p<0.001). Conclusion: In comparison to a commonly used pacifier the novel one causes significantly less anterior open bites.

Keywords

pacifier, malocclusion, open bite

Cite and Share

Stefan Zimmer,Hanna Zuralski,Mozhgan Bizhang,Thomas Ostermann,Claudia R Barthel. Anterior Open Bite In 27 Months Old Children after Use of a Novel Pacifier – A Cohort Study. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2016. 40(4);328-333.

References

1. Mitchell EA, Taylor BJ, Ford RP, et al. Dummies and the sudden infant death syndrome. Arch Dis Child 68: 501-504, 1993.

2. American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on Sudden Infant Death Syndrome. The changing concept of sudden infant death syndrome: diagnostic coding shifts, controversies regarding the sleeping environment, and new variables to consider in reducing risk. Pediatrics 116: 1245-1255, 2005.

3. Carbajal R, Chauvet X, Couderc S, Olivier-Martin M. Randomised trial of analgesic effects of sucrose, glucose, and pacifiers in term neonates. BMJ 319: 1393-1397, 1999.

4. Zempsky WT, Cravero JP. Relief of pain and anxiety in pediatric patients in emergency medical systems. Pediatrics 114: 1348-1356, 2004.

5. Liaw JJ, Yang L, Ti Y, Blackburn ST, Chang YC, Sun LW. Non-nutritive sucking relieves pain for preterm infants during heel stick procedures in Taiwan. J Clin Nurs 19: 2741-2751, 2010.

6. Carbajal R, Lenclen R, Gajdos V, Jugie M, Paupe A. Crossover trial of analgesic efficacy of glucose and pacifier in very preterm neonates during subcutaneous injections. Pediatrics 110: 389-393, 2002.

7. Adair SM. Pacifier use in children: a review of recent literature. Pediatr Dent 25: 449-458, 2003.

8. Rovers MM, Numans ME, Langenbach E, Grobbee DE, Verheij TJ, Schilder AG. Is pacifier use a risk factor for acute otitis media? A dynamic cohort study. Fam Pract 25: 233-236, 2008.

9. Neff MJ. AAP, AAFP release guideline on diagnosis and management of acute otitis media. Am Fam Physician 69: 2713-2715, 2004.

10. Barros FC, Victora CG, Semer TC, Tonioli Filho S, Tomasi E, Weiderpass E. Use of pacifiers is associated with decreased breast-feeding duration. Pediatrics 95: 497-499, 1995.

11. Victora CG, Tomasi E, Olinto MT, Barros FC. Use of pacifiers and breastfeeding duration. Lancet 341: 404-406, 1993.

12. Victora CG, Behague DP, Barros FC, Olinto MT, Weiderpass E. Pacifier use and short breastfeeding duration: cause, consequence, or coincidence? Pediatrics 99: 445-453, 1997.

13. Lindsten R, Larsson E. Pacifier-sucking and breast-feeding: a comparison between the 1960 s and the 1990 s. J Dent Child (Chic) 76: 199-203, 2009.

14. Sexton S, Natale R. Risks and benefits of pacifiers. Am Fam Physician 79: 681-685, 2009.

15. Poyak J. Effects of pacifiers on early oral development. Int J Orthod Milwaukee 17: 13-16, 2006.

16. Gois EG, Ribeiro-Junior HC, Vale MP, et al. Influence of nonnutritive sucking habits, breathing pattern and adenoid size on the development of malocclusion. Angle Orthod 78: 647-654, 2008.

17. de Sousa RV, Ribeiro GL, Firmino RT, Martins CC, Granville-Garcia AF, Paiva SM. Prevalence and associated factors for the development of anterior open bite and posterior crossbite in the primary dentition. Braz Dent J 25: 336-342, 2014.

18. Moimaz SA, Garbin AJ, Lima AM, Lolli LF, Saliba O, Garbin CA. Longitudinal study of habits leading to malocclusion development in childhood. BMC Oral Health 14: 96, 2014.

19. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, Group C. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. PLoS Med 7: e1000251, 2010.

20. Zimmer S, Barthel CR, Ljubicic R, Bizhang M, Raab WH. Efficacy of a novel pacifier in the prevention of anterior open bite. Pediatr Dent 33: 52-55, 2011.

21. Adair SM, Milano M, Lorenzo I, Russell C. Effects of current and former pacifier use on the dentition of 24- to 59-month-old children. Pediatr Dent 17: 437-444, 1995.

22. Hebling SR, Cortellazzi KL, Tagliaferro EP, et al. Relationship between malocclusion and behavioral, demographic and socioeconomic variables: a cross-sectional study of 5-year-olds. J Clin Pediatr Dent 33: 75-79, 2008.

23. Peres KG, De Oliveira Latorre Mdo R, Sheiham A, Peres MA, Victora CG, Barros FC. Social and biological early life influences on the prevalence of open bite in Brazilian 6-year-olds. Int J Paediatr Dent 17: 41-49, 2007.

24. Scavone H, Jr., Ferreira RI, Mendes TE, Ferreira FV. Prevalence of posterior crossbite among pacifier users: a study in the deciduous dentition. Braz Oral Res 21: 153-158, 2007.

25. Melink S, Vagner MV, Hocevar-Boltezar I, Ovsenik M. Posterior crossbite in the deciduous dentition period, its relation with sucking habits, irregular orofacial functions, and otolaryngological findings. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 138: 32-40, 2010.

26. Charchut SW, Allred EN, Needleman HL. The effects of infant feeding patterns on the occlusion of the primary dentition. J Dent Child (Chic) 70: 197-203, 2003.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 1.8 (2023) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top