Article Data

  • Views 1024
  • Dowloads 124

Original Research

Open Access

Salivary Streptococcus mutans and lactobacillus sp levels in cardiac children

  • M.C.M.B.Torres1,*,
  • M.E. Ramos2
  • T.L. Coelho3
  • S. Harari4

1Department of Periodontology, Estacio de Sa University, UNESA-RJ, Brazil

2Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Rio de Janeiro Federal University, U.F.R.J. and Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Estacio de Sa University, UNESA-R.J., Brazil

3Department of Oral Surgery, Rio de Janeiro Federal University, U.F.R.J., Brazil

4Department of Community Dentistry, Rio de Janeiro Federal University, U.F.R.J., Brazil

DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.26.1.xh42614j61p421v7 Vol.26,Issue 1,January 2002 pp.103-110

Published: 01 January 2002

Abstract

This study assesses salivary conditions of 20 children with cardiac disease comparing with a control group of 15 healthy children. The results showed that there was no difference between the groups on salivary flow, buffer capacity and the level of Streptococcus mutans (Sm). The test group i.e., children with cardiac disease, showed a lower level of Lactobacillus sp. The association between the usage of antibiotics and the risk of developing caries, measuring the level of Streptococcus mutans and Lacto-bacillus sp., showed that children taking antibiotics frequently had a significant lower level of Lacto-bacillus sp (p<0.05) than healthy children. This association was not found on relation to the levels of Streptococcus mutans.

Cite and Share

M.C.M.B.Torres,M.E. Ramos,T.L. Coelho,S. Harari. Salivary Streptococcus mutans and lactobacillus sp levels in cardiac children. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2002. 26(1);103-110.

References

1. Abrahão JMB, et al. Prevenção da endocardite bacteriana: recomendações atuais revista. Brasileira de Odontologia 54: 354-358, 1997.

2. American heart association prevention of bacterial endocarditis. J Am Heart Association 264: 2919-2922, 1990.

3. Bayliss R, et al. The teeth and infective endocarditis. British Heart J 50: 506-512, 1983.

4. Bayliss R, et al. The microbiology and pathogenesis of infective endocarditis. Br Heart J 50: 513-519, 1983.

5. Bayliss R, et al. Incidence, mortality and prevention of infective endocarditis. J Royal College Physicians of London 20: 15-20, 1986.

6. Buckingham JK et al. Prevention of endocarditis: communica-tion between doctors and dentists. Br Dent J 172: 414-415, 1992.

7. Disney JA et al. The university of North Carolina caries risk assessment study: further developments in caries risk prediction. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 20: 64-75, 1992.

8. Dajani AS et al. Prevention of bacterial endocarditis – recom-mendations by the American Heart Association. JAMA 277: 1794-1801, 1997.

9. Epstein JB. Infective endocarditis: dental implications and new guidelines for antibiotics prophylaxis. Can Dent Assoc 64: 281-284, 1998.

10. Ericson T, et al. Saliva-formação, composição, possível função. in: thylstrup, anders, ferjerskov tratado de cariologia. ed. Cultura Médica, Rio de Janeiro. pp 16-32, 1988.

11. Fortes CQ. Endocardite infecciosa. in Schechter M, Marangoni DV. Doenças infecciosas-conduta diagnóstica e terapeutica. 1 ed. Rio de Janeiro. Guanabara Koogan pp. 234-56, 1994.

12. Franco E, et al. Dental disease, caries related microflora and sali-vary flow of children with severe congenital cardiac disease: an epidemiological and oral microbial survey. Pediatr Dent 18: 228-235, 1996.

13. Guntheroth WG. How important are dental procedures as a cause of infective endocarditis? Am J Cardiology 54: 797-801, 1984.

14. Hallet KB, et al. Oral health of children with congenital cardiac diseases: a controlled study. Pediatr Dent 14: 224-230, 1992.

15. Harris SL. Definitions and demographic characteristics. in Kaye, ed. Infective endocarditis., 2 ed. New York, Raven Press, 1-8, 1992.

16. Hobson RS, Clark JD. Management of the orthodontic patient “at risk” from Infective endocarditis. Br Dent J 178: 289-295, 1995.

17. Holbrook P, Willey RF, Shaw TRD. Dental health in patients sus-ceptible to infective endocarditis. Br Med J 283: 371-372, 1981.

18. Imperiale TF, Howewitz RI. Does prophylaxis prevent post den-tal infective endocarditis? a controlled evaluation of protective efficacy. Am J Med 88: 131-135, 1990.

19. Jordan HV, Laraway R, Snirch R, Marmel M. A simplified diag-nostic system for cultural detection and enumeration of strepto-coccus mutans. J Dent Res 66: 57-61, 1987.

20. Knox KW, Hunter N. The role of oral bacteria in the pathogene-sis of infective endocarditis. Australian Dent J 36: 386-392, 1991.

21. Lacerda SA, et al. Levantamento epidemiológico de lesões bucais x conteúdo programático de semiologia. XV Reunião Anual da Sbpqo-sp, abst p184, p156, 1998.

22. Mansur AJ, et al. Prevenção da endocardite infecciosa: a necessária participação dos dentistas. Revista da APCD 42: 165-67, 1988.

23. Neves J. Endocardite infecciosa. in: Neves J. Diagnóstico e trata-mento das doenças infecciosas e parasitárias. 2 ed. Rio de Janeiro, Guanabara, pp 424-436, 1983.

24. O’sullivan J, Anderson J, Bain H. Infective endocarditis in chil-dren following dental extraction and appropriate antibiotic pro-phylaxis. Br Med J 181: 64-65, 1996.

25. Pollard MA, Curzon EJ. Dental health and salivary streptococcus mutans levels in a group of children with heart defects. Int J Pae-diatr Dent 2: 81-85, 1992.

26. Ramos BC, Maia LC, Sarruf DN. Importância da anamnese no reconhecimento de pacientes de risco. XV Reunião Anual da Sbpqo-sp, abst p196, p160, 1998.

27. Roberts GJ, Roberts IF. Dental disease in chronically sick chil-dren. J Dent Child 48: 346-51, 1981.

28. Roberts GJ, et al. Dental bacteriemia in children. Pediatr Cardi-ology 18: 24-27, 1997.

29. Smith AJ, Adams D. The dental status and attitudes of patients at risk from infetive endocarditis. Br Dent J 174: 59-64, 1993.

30. Thom AR, Howe GL. The dental status of cardiac patients. Br Med J 43: 1302-1307, 1972.

31. Tunkel AP, Mandell GL. Infecting microorganisms. in Kaye, ed. Infectives endocarditis., 2 ed. New York, Raven Press, pp 1-8, 1992.

32. van der Meer J, Vanwijk W, Thompson J, et al. Efficacy of antibi-otic prophylaxis for prevention of native valve endocarditis. Lancet 339: 135-139, 1992.

33. Young SEJ. Aetiology and epidemiology of infective endocardi-tis in England and Wales. J Antimicrob Chemother 20: (Suppl A) 7- 14, 1987.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 1.8 (2023) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top