Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Article Menu
Export Article
More by Authors Links
Article Data
- Views 935
- Dowloads 150
Original Research
Open AccessArtificial formed caries-like lesions around esthetic restorative materials
Artificial formed caries-like lesions around esthetic restorative materials
1Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Conservative Dentistry, University of Hacettepe, Ankara
DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.26.3.aun5413hm163g344 Vol.26,Issue 3,July 2002 pp.289-296
Published: 01 July 2002
*Corresponding Author(s): Nuray Attar E-mail: nurayattar@hotmail.com
Abstract
Dental restorations fail for a variety of reasons. Secondary caries is one of the primary causes of fail-ure of dental restorations. One method for reducing frequency and severity of this problem is the use of fluoride containing restorative materials. The ability of a material to inhibit secondary caries for-mation is an important clinical therapeutic property. This investigation assessed the capacity of esthetic restorative materials to resist caries in vitro.Class V cavities were prepared in buccal and lingual sur-faces of 50 extracted sound third molars. The occlusal and gingival cavosurface margin of each prepa-ration was on enamel surface. The five materials were used: Conventional glass ionomer cement Cer-amfil ß (PSP), two polyacid modified resin composites Compoglass (Vivadent) and Dyract (Dentsply/DeTrey), non fluoride releasing composite resin Valux Plus (3M) and fluoride releasing composite resin Tetric (Vivadent). After 10 weeks in an acid gel for caries-like lesion formation, the teeth were sectioned occluso-gingivally through the middle of the restorations and examined by polar-ized light microscopy, while immersed in water. The statistical analysis of the results showed that sec-ondary caries initiation and progression might be reduced significantly when fluoride-containing materials were placed. The conventional glass ionomer cement (Ceramfil ß) provided the highest pro-tection against caries attack and the non-fluoride releasing composite resin (Valux Plus) restoration provided the least (p<0.05).
Cite and Share
Nuray Attar,Alev Önen. Artificial formed caries-like lesions around esthetic restorative materials. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2002. 26(3);289-296.
References
1. Allan DN. A longitudinal study of dental restorations. Br Dent J 143: 87-89, 1977.
2. Mjor IA. Placement and replacement of restorations. Oper Dent 6: 49-54,1981.
3. Mjor IA. Frequency of secondary caries at various anatomical locations. Oper Dent 10: 88, 1985.
4. Boyd MA, Richardson AS. Frequency of amalgam replacement in general dental practice. J Canad Dent Assoc 51: 763-766,1985.
5. Kidd EA, Toffenetti F, Mjor IA. Secondary caries. Int Dent J 42: 127- 138, 1992.
6. Forsten L. Short and long term fluoride release from glass ionomers and other fluoride containing filling materials in vitro. Scand J Dent Res 98: 179-185, 1990.
7. Rawls HR , Zimmermann BF. Fluoride-exchanging resins for caries protection. Caries Res 17:32-43, 1983.
8. Skartveit L, Tveit AB, Ekstrand J. Fluoride release from a fluo-ride containing amalgam in vivo. Scand J Dent Res 93: 448-452, 1985.
9. Olsen BT, Garcia Godoy F, Marshall TD, Barnwell GM. Fluoride release from glass ionomer-lined amalgam restorations. Am J Dent 2: 89 –91, 1989.
10. Forsten L. Fluoride release and uptake by glass ionomers. Scand J Dent Res 99: 241-245, 1991.
11. Donly KJ, Ingram C. An in vitro caries inhibition of photopoly-merized glass ionomer liners. J Dent Child 64:128-130, 1997.
12. Dionysopoulos P, Kotsanos N, Papadogiannis Y, Kotstantinidis A. Artificial secondary caries around two new F-containing restora-tives. Oper Dent 23: 81-86, 1998.
13. Hse KMY, Leung SK, Wei SHY. Resin-ionomer restorative materials for children: A review. Aust Dent J 44: 1-11, 1999.
14. Retief DH, Bradley EL, Denton JC, Switzer P. Enamel and cementum fluoride uptake from a glass ionomer cement. Caries Res 18: 250-257, 1984.
15. Forss H, Seppa L. Prevention of enamel demineralization adja-cent to glass ionomer filling materials. Scand J Dent Res 98: 173-178, 1990.
16. Skartveit L, Tveit AB, Totdal B, Ovrebo R, Raadal M. In vivo flu-oride uptake in enamel and dentine from fluoride containing material. J Dent Child 57: 97-100, 1990.
17. Hicks MJ, Flaitz CM, Silverstone LM. Secondary caries forma-tion in vitro around glass ionomer restorations. Quintessence Int 17: 527-532, 1986.
18. Tyas MJ. Cariostatic effect of glass ionomer cement: A five-year clinical study. Aust Dent J 36:236-239, 1991.
19. Varpio M, Noren JG. Artificial caries in primary and permanent teeth adjacent to composite resin and glass ionomer cement restorations. Pediatr Dent 16: 107-109, 1994.
20. Seppa L, Torppa-Saarinen E, Luoma H. Effect of different glass ionomers on the acid production and electrolyte metabolism of streptococcus mutans ingbritt. Caries Res 26: 434-438, 1992.
21. Benelli EM, Serra MC, Rodrigues Jr AL, Curry JA. In situ anti-cariogenic potential of glass ionomer cement. Caries Res 27: 280-284, 1993.
22. Seppa L, Korhonen A, Nuutinen A. Inhibitory effect on S. mutans by fluoride treated conventional and resin-reinforced glass ionomer cements. Eur J Oral Sci 103: 182-185, 1995.
23. Burgess JO, Norling BK, Ralph Rawls H, Ong JL. Directly placed esthetic restorative materials. The Continuum Com-pendium 17: 731-748, 1996.
24. Guggenberger R, May R, Stefan KP. New trends in glass-ionomer chemistry. Biomaterials 19: 479-483, 1998.
25. Momoi Y, Mc Cabe JF. Fluoride release from light activated glass ionomer restorative cements. Dent Mater 9: 151-154, 1993.
26. Forsten L. Resin-modified glass ionomer cements: fluoride release and uptake. Acta Odontol Scand 53: 222-225, 1995.
27. De Araujo FB, Garcia-Goday F, Curry JA, Conceiçao EN. Fluo-ride release from fluoride-containing materials. Oper Dent 21: 185- 190, 1996.
28. Tam LE, Çhan GPL, Yim D. In vitro caries inhibition effects by conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomer restorations. Oper Dent 22: 4-14, 1997.
29. Donly KJ, Segura A, Wefel JS, Hogan BA. Evaluating the effect of fluoride releasing dental materials on adjacent interproximal caries. JADA 130: 817-825, 1999.
30. Suljak JP, Hatibovic-Kofman S. A fluoride release-adsorption-release system applied to fluoride releasing restorative materials. Quintessence Intl 27: 635-638,1996.
31. Arends J, Ruben J. Fluoride release from a composite resin. Quintessence Int 19: 513-514, 1988.
32. Swift EJ. Fluoride release from two composite resins. Quintes-sence Int 20: 895-897, 1989.
33. Young A,Von Der Fehr FR, Sonju T, Nordbo H. Fluoride release and uptake in vitro from a composite resin and two orthodontic adhesives. Acta Odontol Scand 54: 223-228, 1996.
34. Zimmerman BF, Rawls HR, Querens AE. Prevention of in vitro secondary caries with an experimental fluoride exchanging restorative resin. J Dent Res 63: 689-692, 1984.
35. Arends J, Ruben J, Dijkman AG. The effect of fluoride-contain-ing composite resin on secondary caries: an in vitro study. Quin-tessence Int 21: 671-674, 1990.
36. Tantbirojin D, Retief DH, Russell CM. Enamel, cementum and dentin fluoride uptake from a fluoride releasing resin composite. Am J Dent 5: 226-232, 1992.
37. Hattab FN, Mok YC, Agnew EC. Artificially formed caries-like lesions around restorative materials. JADA 118: 193-197, 1989.
38. Dunne SM, Goolnik JS, Millar BJ, Seddon RP. Caries inhibition by a resin modified and a conventional glass ionomer cement, in vitro. J Dent 24: 91-94, 1996.
39. Yassin OM. In vitro studies of the effect of a dental explorer on the formation of an artificial carious lesion. J Dent Child 62: 111-117, 1995.
40. Hicks MJ, Flaitz CM, Silverstone LM. Initiation and progression of caries-like lesions of enamel: effect of periodic treatment with syn-thetic saliva and sodium fluoride. Caries Res 19: 481-489, 1985.
41. Dionysopoulos P, Kotsanos N, Koliniotou- Koubia E, Papado-giannis Y. Secondary caries formation in-vitro around fluoride-releasing restorations. Oper Dent 19: 183-188, 1994.
42. Hicks MJ, Flaitz CM. Resin-modified glass-ionomer restorations and in vitro secondary caries formation in coronal enamel. Quin-tessence Int 31: 570-578, 2000.
43. Hals E, Andreassen BH, Bie T. Histopathology of natural caries around silver fillings. Caries Res 8: 343-358, 1974.
44. Kidd EA, Silversstone LM. Remineralisation in vitro of artificial caries-like lesions product in relation to amalgam restorations. Caries Res 12: 238-242, 1978.
45. Heintze U, Mornstad H. Artificial caries-like lesions around con-ventional, fluoride-containing and dispersed amalgams. Caries Res 14: 414-421, 1980.
46. Kidd EA. The histopathology of artificial lesions created in vitro in relation to unfilled and filled cavities. Caries Res 11: 173-177. 1977.
47. Weatherell JA, Deutsch D, Robinson C, Hallsworth AS. Assimi-lation of fluoride by enamel throughout the life of the tooth. Caries Res 11: Suppl. 1, p. 85-115, 1977.
48. Kidd EA. Cavity sealing ability of composite and glass ionomer cement restorations. An assessment in vitro. Br Dent J 144: 139-142, 1978.
49. Swartz ML, Phillips RW, Clark HC. Long- term F release from glass ionomer cements. J Dent Res 63: 158-160, 1984.
50. Musa A, Pearson GJ, Davies EH. Fluoride ion release from light activated and conventional glass ionomer cements. J Dent Res 73 Abstracts of Papers p 844 Abstract 459, 1994.
51. El Mallakh BF, Sarkar NK. Fluoride release from glass ionomer cements in de-ionized water and artificial saliva. Dent Mater 6: 118- 122, 1990.
52. De Schepper EJ, Berry EA, Cailleteau JG, Tate WH. A compar-ative study of fluoride release from glass ionomer cements. Quin-tessence Int 22: 215-220, 1991.
53. Forsten L. Fluoride release and uptake by glass ionomers and related materials and its clinical effect. Biomaterials 19: 503-508, 1998.
54. Dijkman GE, Arends J. Secondary caries in situ around fluoride releasing light-curing composites: A quantitative model investi-gation on four materials with a fluoride content between 0 and 26 vol %. Caries Res 26: 351-357, 1992.
55. Hsu CYS, Donly KJ, Drake DR, Wefel JS. Effect of aged fluo-ride-containing restorative materials on recurrent root caries. J Dent Res 77: 418-425, 1998.
Abstracted / indexed in
Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.
Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.
Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.
JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.
Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.
BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.
Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.
Scopus: CiteScore 1.8 (2023) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.
Submission Turnaround Time
Conferences
Top