Article Data

  • Views 1114
  • Dowloads 167

Original Research

Open Access

Cephalometric characteristics of bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion in early mixed dentition


  • Hung-Huey Tsai1,*,

1Department of Pedodontics, School of Dentistry, China Medical College, 91 Hsueh Shih Road, Taichung. 404 Taiwan

DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.26.4.lqn08w5827576j60 Vol.26,Issue 4,October 2002 pp.363-370

Published: 01 October 2002

*Corresponding Author(s): Hung-Huey Tsai E-mail: hunghuey@mail.cmc.edu.tw

Abstract

The children with bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion in early mixed dentition were compared with the normal occlusion children. The bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion children had significant smaller inter-incisal angle and greater convexity,A-B plane, and ANB angles than the normal children. Maxillary and mandibular growths of the bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion girls were greater than those of normal girls. The direction of the mandibular growth of the bimaxillary dentoalveolar pro-trusion boys showed a tendency of downward and backward.


Cite and Share

Hung-Huey Tsai. Cephalometric characteristics of bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion in early mixed dentition. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2002. 26(4);363-370.

References

1. Garcia CJ. Cephalometric evaluation of Mexican Americans using the Downs and Steiner analyses. Am J Orthodont 68: 67-74, 1975.

2. Fonseca RJ. Klein WD. A cephalometric evaluation of American Negro women. Am J Orthodont 73: 152-60, 1978.

3. Alexander TL. Hitchcock HP. Cephalometric standards for Amer-ican Negro children. Am J Orthodont 74: 298-304, 1978.

4. Nanda R. Nanda RS. Cephalometric study of the dentofacial com-plex of North Indians. Angle Orthodont 39: 22-8, 1969.

5. Uesato G. Kinoshita Z. Kawamoto T. Koyama I. Nakanishi Y. Steiner cephalometric norms for Japanese and Japanese-Ameri-cans. Am J Orthodont 73: 321-7, 1978.

6. Engel G. Spolter BM. Cephalometric and visual norms for a Japanese population. Am J Orthodont 80: 48-60, 1981.

7. Hajighadimi M. Dougherty HL. Garakani F. Cephalometric eval-uation of Iranian children and its comparison with Tweed’s and Steiner’s standards. Am J Orthodont 79: 192-7, 1981.

8. Craven, A. H.: A radiographic cephalometric study of the central Australian Aboriginal. Angle Orthodont 28: 12-35, 1958.

9. Miura, F., Inoue, N., and Suzuki, K.: Cephalometric standards for Japanese according to the Steiner analysis. Am J Orthodont 51: 288- 295, 1965.

10. Humerfelt A. Slagsvold O. Changes in occlusion and craniofacial pattern between 11 and 25 years of age. A follow-up study of individuals with normal occlusion. Transactions of the European Orthodontic Society. 113-22, 1972.

11. Lamberton CM. Reichart PA. Triratananimit P. Bimaxillary pro-trusion as a pathologic problem in the Thai. Am J Orthodont 77: 320- 9, 1980.

12. Richardson ME. Late lower arch crowding. The role of facial mor-phology. Angle Orthodont 56: 244-54, 1986.

13. Leighton BC. Hunter WS. Relationship between lower arch spac-ing/crowding and facial height and depth. Am J Orthodont 82: 418- 25, 1982.

14. Isaacson RJ. Zapfel RJ. Worms FW. Erdman AG. Effects of rota-tional jaw growth on the occlusion and profile. Am J Orthodont 72: 276-86, 1977.

15. Lavergne J. Gasson N. The influence of jaw rotation on the mor-phogenesis of malocclusion. Am J Orthodont 73: 658-66, 1978.

16. Bjork A. Skieller V. Facial development and tooth eruption. An implant study at the age of puberty.Am J Orthodont 62:339-83,1972.

17. Bjork A. Prediction of mandibular growth rotation. Am J Ortho-dont 55: 585-99, 1969.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 1.8 (2023) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top