Article Menu

Export Article

More by Authors Links

Article Data

  • Views 697
  • Dowloads 110

Original Research

Open Access

Influence of prophylaxis on the microleakage of sealants: in vitro study

  • Ana Beatriz Alonso Chevitarese1,*,
  • Orlando Chevitarese2
  • Ivete Pomarico Ribeiro de Souza3
  • Roberto Braga de Carvalho Vianna1

1Rua Conde de Bonfim, 573/804, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 20520-052

2Rua Clemente Falcao, 118, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 20520-052

3Praia do Flamengo, 370/202, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 20520-052

DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.26.4.v8lm755w4n414113 Vol.26,Issue 4,October 2002 pp.371-376

Published: 01 October 2002

*Corresponding Author(s): Ana Beatriz Alonso Chevitarese E-mail: biachevitarese@ig.com.br

PDF (1.28 MB) View Full-text

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of prophylaxis on the sealants microleakage in 30 premolars divided into: Group A, Group B and Group C. The teeth were analyzed using the optical microscope (OM) and at scanning electron microscope (SEM). There was a statitical significant dif-ference among the groups regarding the presence of microleakage, but not with the presence of tags.

Cite and Share

Ana Beatriz Alonso Chevitarese,Orlando Chevitarese,Ivete Pomarico Ribeiro de Souza,Roberto Braga de Carvalho Vianna. Influence of prophylaxis on the microleakage of sealants: in vitro study. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2002. 26(4);371-376.

URL:

https://www.jocpd.com/articles/10.17796/jcpd.26.4.v8lm755w4n414113

References

1. Andrioni JN. Estudos comparativos entre a adaptação de um selante fotopolimerizável e um de polimerização química ao esmalte humano aplicados após limpeza de das fossas e fissuras por diferentes processos. Tese (Livre- docência). Faculdade de Odontologia de Araçatuba, Unesp. Araçatuba, 1986.

2. Baratieri LN. Dentística: procedimentos preventivos e restau-radores. 2ª edição (4ª impressão): Quintessence Books, ed. San-tos, p. 147-163, 1995.

3. Brown JR, Barkmeier WW. A comparison of six enamel treat-ment procedures for sealant bonding. Ped Dent 18: 29-31, 1996.

4. Chan DC. et al. Evaluation of different methods for cleaning and preparing occlusal fissures. Oper Dent 24: 331-336, 1999.

5. Cooley RL. et al. Evaluation of a fluoride-containing sealant by SEM, microleakage, and fluoride release. Ped Dent 12: 38-42, 1990.

6. Eildelman, E., et al..The structure of the enamel in primary teeth: practical applications in restorative techniques. J Dent Child 43: 172- 176, 1976.

7. Garcia-Godoy F, et al.. Fluoride release from fissure sealants. J Clin Pediatr Dent 22: 45-49, 1997.

8. Garcia-Godoy F, Gwinnett AJ. Penetration of acid solution and gel in occlusal fissures. J A D A 114: 809-810, 1987.

9. Gwinnett AJ. The scientific basis on the sealant procedure. J Prev Dent 3: 15-28, 1976.

10. Hatibovic-Kofman S, et al. Microleakage of sealants after con-ventional, bur, and air-abrasion preparation of pits and fissures. Pediatr Dent 20: 173-176, 1998.

11. Hormati AA, et al. Effects of contamination and mechanical dis-turbancy on the quality of acid etched enamel. J A D A 100: 34-38, 1980.

12. Ismail AI, et al. An evaluation of the Saskatchevan pit and fissure sealant program: a longitudinal follow-up. J Public Health Dent 49: 206-211, 1989.

13. Issáo M, Ando T. Selantes de fóssulas e fissuras. Método de pre-venção de cáries oclusais. Enciclop Bras Odont 1: 1-14, 1983.

14. Jensen OE. Effects of a fluoride-realinsing fissure sealant on arti-ficial enamel caries. J A D A 3: 75-78, 1990.

15. Kramer PF, Feldens CA, Romano AR. Promoção de Saúde em Odontopediatria. 1ªedição, Editora Artes Médicas, p.47-51, 2000.

16. Meckel AH. The formation and properties of organic films on teeth. Archs Oral Biol 10: 585-597, 1965.

17. Miura F. et al. Scanning eletron microscopic studies on the direct bondind system. Bull. Tokyo Med Dent Univ 20: 245-260, 1973.

18. Moll K, et al. Microleakage of class V composite restorations: effect of dye. J Dent Res 79: 147, 2000.

19. Pinheiro CE. Curso de bioquímica da cárie dental II – Precipi-tações salivares: película adquirida e placa dental. Rev Paul Odontol 4: 18-30, 1982.

20. Pope BD, et al. Effectiveness of occlusal fissure cleansing meth-ods and sealants micromorphology. J Dent Child 63: 175-180, 1996.

21. Ripa LW. Preventing pit and fissure caries – a guide to sealant use. Boston, Massachusetts Department of Public Health, 1986.

22. Ripa LW. The current status of pit and fissere sealants. A review. J Can Dent Assoc 51: 377-380, 1985.

23. Rock WP. The effect of etching of human enamel upon bond strenghs with fissure sealants resins. Arch Oral Biol 19: 873-877, 1974.

24. Silverstone LM. Preventive dentistry, New Jersey: Update Books, Fort-Lee, 1978.

25. Strand GV, Radal M. The efficiency of cleaning fissures with air-polishing instrument. Acta Odont Scand 46: 113-117, 1988.

26. Sundfeld RH. Análise da retenção e penetração no esmalte den-tal de um selante com flúor (Fluroshield). Rev Assoc Paul Cir Dent 48: 1251-1255, 1994.

27. Sundfeld RH, et al.. Efeitos in vivo da profilaxia do esmalte den-tal na penetração de selantes de fóssulas e fissuras: estudo microcópico. RBO, 55: 269-275, 1998.

28. Taylor CL, Gwinnett AJ. A study of the penetration of sealants into pits and fissures. J A D A 87: 1181-1189, 1973.

29. Valseck Jr, A, Vertuan V. Retenção e eficácia do selante. Rev. Gaúcha Odont 36: 381-388, 1988.

30. Weerheijm KL, et al. Clinically undetected occlusal dentine caries: a radiographic comparison. Caries Res, 26: 305-309, 1992.

31. Weintraub J. The effectiveness of pit and fissure sealants. J Pub-lic Health Dent 49: 317-330, 1989.

32. Xalabarde A. et al.:Fissure micromorphology and sealant adap-tation after occlusal enameloplasty and thermocycling. J Clin Ped Dent 20: 299-304, 1996.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 1.8 (2023) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top