Article Data

  • Views 942
  • Dowloads 251

Original Research

Open Access

Treatment planning in the presence of congenitally absent second premolars: a review of the literature

  • Lori Lee Santos1,*,

1Department of Pediatric Dentistry, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio

DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.27.1.5q06x95w2p657107 Vol.27,Issue 1,January 2003 pp.13-18

Published: 01 January 2003

*Corresponding Author(s): Lori Lee Santos E-mail: lorileesantos@hotmail.com

Abstract

One of the most common dental anomalies encountered by the pediatric dentist is the congenital absence of second premolars. Once diagnosed, the appropriate treatment necessitates the formu-lation of a comprehensive treatment plan, which is dependent upon a number of factors. Consid-erations include: the condition of the deciduous molar, dental and skeletal relationships, dental age of the patient, willingness of the patient to undergo extensive dental treatment and financial con-siderations. Approaches to the management of congenitally missing premolars have been described in the literature, including the more recently available option of dental implant place-ment. The objective of this paper is to present a review of the literature with emphasis on the con-siderations needed for appropriate treatment planning when the practitioner is confronted with this diagnostic challenge.

Cite and Share

Lori Lee Santos. Treatment planning in the presence of congenitally absent second premolars: a review of the literature. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2003. 27(1);13-18.

References

1. Thilander B, Myrberg N. The prevalence of malocclusion in Swedish school children. Scand J Dent Res 81: 12-20, 1973.

2. Bergstrom K. An orthopantomographic study of hypodontia, supernumeraries and other anomalies in school children between the ages of eight to nine years. Swed Dent J 1: 145-157, 1977.

3. Locht S. Panoramic radiographic examination of 704 Danish children aged 9-10 years. Comm Dent Oral Epid 8: 375-378, 1980.

4. Grahen H. Hypodontia in the permanent dentition. A clinical and genetic investigation. Odontologisk Revy 7: Supp 3, 1-100, 1956.

5. Rolling S. Hypodontia of permanent teeth in Danish school-chil-dren. Scand J Dent Res 88: 365-369, 1980.

6. Stritzel F, Symons AL, Gage JP. Agenesis of the second premolar in males and females: distribution, number and sites affected. J Clin Ped Dent 15: 39-41, 1990.

7. Hunstadbraten K. Hypodontia in the permanent dentition. J Dent Child 40: 31-33, 1973.

8. Suarez BK, Spence MA. The genetics of hypodontia. J Dent Res 53: 781-785, 1974.

9. Ten Cate AR. Development of the tooth and its supporting struc-tures. In Oral histology: Development, structure, and function, 5th Ed. St. Louis, Mosby, pp 78-103, 1998.

10. da Fonseca MA. Pediatric bone marrow transplantation: oral complications and recommendations for care. Pediatr Dent 20: 386- 393, 1998.

11. Kjaer I, Kocsis G, Nodal M, Christensen LR. Aetiological aspects of mandibular tooth agenesis—focusing on the role of nerve, oral mucosa, and supporting tissues. Eur J Orthod 16: 371-375, 1994.

12. Chen Y, Bei M, Woo I, Satokata I, Maas R. Msx1 controls induc-tive signaling in mammalian tooth morphogenesis. Development 122: 3035-3044, 1996.

13. Peters H, Balling R. Teeth. Where and how to make them. Trends in Genetics 15: 59-65, 1999.

14. Stockton DW, Das P, Goldenberg M, D’Souza RN, Patel PI. Mutation of Pax9 is associated with oligodontia. Nat Gen 24: 18-29, 2000.

15. Haavikko K. The formation and the alveolar and clinical erup-tion of permanent teeth. An orthopantomographic study. Suomen Hammaslaakariseuran Toimituskia 66: 103-170, 1970.

16. Garn SM, Lewis AB, Polachek DL. Variability of tooth forma-tion. J Dent Res 38: 135-148, 1959.

17. Lindqvist B. Extraction of the deciduous second molar in hypodontia. Eur J Orthod 2:173-181, 1980.

18. Wisth PJ, Thunhold K, Boe OE. The craniofacial morphology of individuals with hypodontia. Acta Odonto Scand 32: 293-302, 1974.

19. Bjerklin K, Bennet J. The long-term survival of lower second pri-mary molars in subjects with agenesis of the premolars. Eur J Orthod 22: 245-255, 2000.

20. Kocadereli I, Ciger S. Congenitally missing teeth: an alternative approach for space closure. Clin Pediatr Dent 17: 213-216, 1993.

21. Joondeph DR, McNeill RW. Congenitally absent second premo-lars: an interceptive approach. Am J Orthod 59: 50-66, 1971.

22. Dewel BF. Second premolar extraction in orthodontics: princi-ples, procedures and case analysis.Am J Orthod 41: 107-120, 1955.

23. Mamopoulou AM, Hagg U, Schroder U, Hansen K. Agenesis of mandibular second premolars. Spontaneous closure after extraction therapy: a four year follow up. Eur J Orthod 18: 589-600, 1996.

24. Kurol J. Infraocclusion of primary molars: and epidemiologic and familial study. Comm Dent Oral Epidem 9: 94-102, 1981.

25. Darling AI, Levers GH. Submerged human deciduous molars and ankylosis. Arch Oral Biol 18: 1021-1040, 1973.

26. Thornton M, Zimmerman ER. Ankylosis of primary teeth. J Dent Child 31: 120-126, 1964.

27. Kurol J, Thilander B. Infraocclusion of primary molars with apla-sia of the permanent successor. Angle Orthod 54: 283-294, 1984.

28. Kurol J, Thilander B. Infraocclusion of primary molars and the effect on occlusal development—a longitudinal study. Eur J Orthod 6: 277-293, 1984.

29. Rune B, Sarnas KV. Root resorption and submergence in retained deciduous second molars. Eur J Orthod 6: 123-131, 1984.

30. Evans RD, Briggs PFA. Restoration of an infraoccluded primary molar with an indirect composite onlay: a case report and litera-ture review. Dent Update 23: 52-54, 1996.

31. Veis RW, Christian JC, Salzer A: Space maintenance. In Manual of appliance therapy for adults and children. Chatsworth: Space Maintainers Laboratory, 1998, pp2.1-2.2, 1998.

32. Jemt T, Laney WR, Harris D et al. Osseointegrated implants for single tooth replacement: a one year report from a multicenter prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2: 29-36, 1991.

33. Lederman PD, Hassel TM, Hefti AF. Oseointegrated dentalimplants as alternative therapy to bridge construction or orthodontics in young patients: seven years of clinical experience. Pediatr Dent 15: 327-332, 1993.

34. Ostler MS, KokichVG. Alveolar ridge changes in patients congenitally missing mandibular second premolars. J Prosth Dent 71: 144-149, 1994.

35. Cronin RJ, Oesterle LJ. Implant use in growing patients—treatment planning concerns. Dent Clin North Am 42: 1-35, 1998.

36. Brugnolo E, Mazzocco C, Cordioli G, Majzoub Z. Clinical and radiographic findings following placement of single-tooth implants in young patients—case reports. Int J Periodon Rest Dent 16: 421-433, 1996.

37. Kearns G, Sharma A, Perrott D, Schmidt B, Kaban L, Vargervik K. Placement of endosseous implants in children and adolescents with ectodermal dysplasia. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 88: 5-10, 1999.

38. Mehrali MC, Baraoidan M, Cranin AN. Use of endosseous implants in treatment of adolescent trauma patients. N Y State Dent J 60: 25-29, 1994.

39. Escobar V, Epker BN. Alveolar bone growth in response to endosteal implants in two patients with ectodermal dyplasia. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 27: 445-447, 1998.

40. Thomas S, Turner SR, Sandy R. Autotransplantation of teeth: is there a role? Br J Orthod 25: 275-282, 1998.

41. Andreasen JO, Paulsen HU, Yu Z, Bayer T, Schwartz O. A long-term study of 370 autotransplanted premolars. Part II. Tooth sur-vival and pulp healing subsequent to transplantation. Eur J Orthod 12: 14-24, 1990.

42. Lundberg T, Isaksson S. A clinical follow-up study of 278 auto-transplanted teeth. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 43: 181-185, 1996.

43. Josefsson E, Brattstrom V, Tegsjo U, Valerius-Olsson H. Treat-ment of lower second premolar agenesis by autotransplantation: four-year evaluation of eighty patients. Acta Odontol Scand 57: 111- 115, 1999.

44. Clokie CML, Yau DM, Chano L. Autogenous tooth transplanta-tion: an alternative to dental implant placement? J Can Dent Assoc 67: 92-95, 2001.

45. Schuman NJ, Owens BM, Mincer HH. Dental transplants: dis-cussion and case report. J Clin Pediatr Dent 21: 281-285, 1997.

46. Northway WM, Konisberg S. Autogenic tooth transplantation: the “state of the art”. Am J Orthod 77: 146-162, 1980.

47. Cohen AS, Shen TC, Pogrel MA. Transplanting teeth success-fully: autografts and allografts that work. J Am Dent Assoc 126: 481- 485, 1995.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 1.8 (2023) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top