Outcomes of dental procedures performed on children under general anesthesia

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the integrity and longevity of restorative and pulpal proce-dures performed on primary teeth under general anesthesia (GA). Fifty-four children, who received comprehensive dental treatment under general anesthesia between 1993 and 1995, were included. The postoperative examination period ranged from 6 to 27 months. Children were examined and the qual-ity of the restorations were recorded and evaluated. Behavior problems and inability to cooperate were the main reasons for treatment under GA. Results showed that restoration of posterior teeth with stain-less steel crowns (SSC) were more successful (95.5%) when compared to amalgam or composite restorations (50%). In the anterior teeth, strip crowns had a success rate similar to that of Class III, IV and V composite resin materials. Pulpotomies showed an extremely high rate of success (97.1%), while sealants were retained 68.3% of the time. In conclusion, SSC are more likely to be successful and last longer than multisurface amalgam or composite restorations in children treated under general anes-thesia. Definitive treatment is more likely to ensure a more positive outcome for children treated under general anesthesia due to less frequent complications from failed restorations or pulpal procedures.

1. McDonald RE, Avery DR. Dentistry for the child and adoles-cent. 5th ed. 364. 1987.

2. O’Sullivan EA, Curzon ME. The efficacy of comprehensive dental care for children under general anesthesia. Br Dent J 170:

56- 8, 1991.

3. Su H L, Chen P S. A clinical evaluation of comprehensive dental treatment for children under general anesthesia. Chang Keng 1 Hsueh 15: 188-92, 1992.

4. Bello LL. A retrospective study of pediatric dental patients treated under general anesthesia. Saudi Dent J 12:10-15, 2000.

5. Enger DJ, Mourineo AP. A survey of 200 pediatric dental general anesthesia cases. J Dent Child 52: 36-41, 1985.

6. Holt RD, Chidiac RH, Rule DC. Dental treatment for children under general anesthesia in day care facilities at a London Dental Hospital. Br Dent J 170: 262-66, 1991.

7. Bojaty B, Spencer P. Trends in dental treatment rendered under general anesthesia 1978-1990. J Clin Pediatric Dent 16: 222-24, 1992.

8. Braff M. A comparison between SSC and multisurface amalgams in primary molars. J Dent Child 42: 474 –78, 1975.

9. Levering N J, Messer L B. The durability of primary molar restorations I. Observations and predictions of success of amalgams. Ped Dent 10: 74-80, 1988.

10. Roberts J F, Sherrif M. The fate and survival of amalgam and performed crown molar restorations placed in specialist pedi-atric dental practice, Br Dent J 169: 237-44, 1990.

11. Holland et al. The longevity of amalgam restorations in decidu-ous molars. Br Dent J 161: 255-8, 1986.

12. Kilpatric N M. Durability of restorations in primary molars, J Dent 21: 67-73, 1993.

13. Dawson L R et al. Use of amalgam and stainless steel restora-tions for primary molars. J Dent Child 48: 420-22, 1981.

14. Messer L B, Levering N J. The durability of primary molar restorations II. Observations and predictions of success of stain-less steel crowns. Ped Dent 10: 81-5, 1988.