Maxillary incisor palatal erosion: no correlation with dietary

The objectives of the study were to examine a relationship between tooth erosion affecting the palatal aspects of permanent maxillary central incisors with dietary, behavioral and medical variables. The methods included, 251 schoolchildren aged 11 to 13 years were recruited to participate. Each subject had dental impressions of the palatal aspects of both upper central incisors recorded at baseline, 9 and 18 months intervals. From these, electroconductive replicas were fabricated, mapped and compared using a surface matching technique. At the end of the study all participants underwent a structured interview that sought to assay the level of potential erosive dietary, behavioral and medical risk factors. Correlation analyses of the responses given in the final structured interview with the degrees of palatal tooth substance loss (both previous and measured) were under taken. The results showed: 1. The degree of previous erosion did not predict the level of measured ongoing erosion. 2. Brushing the teeth more frequently with fluoridated toothpaste correlated significantly with lower levels of ongoing erosion (P = 0.011). It was concluded that: 1. Evidence of previous palatal erosion did not predict future erosion. 2. The application of topical fluoride as a by-product of tooth brushing may provide an element of protection against palatal erosion. 3. In view of the lack of correlation between exposure to potential risk factors and the level of ongoing palatal tooth surface loss in this study, other factors (such as an individual’s susceptibility and salivary buffering power) may well be more important predictors.The clinical relevance included: Preventive advice to patients with dental erosion should not only include the use of topical fluoride, in the form of toothpaste, but recognize individual suscepti-bility to this condition.

1. O’Brien M. Childrens Dental Health in the United Kingdom 1993. Office of Population Censuses and Survey’s. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London, 1994.

2. Walker A, Gregory J, Bradnock G, Nunn JH,White D. National Diet and Nutrition Survey: Young People Aged 4-18 years. Volume 2: Report of the oral health survey.London:The Stationery Office, 2000.

3. Nunn JH. Prevalence of dental erosion and the implications for oral health. European J Oral Sciences 104: 156-161, 1996.

4. Ten Cate JM, Imfeld T. Dental erosion. Summary. Euro J Oral Sciences 104: 241-244, 1996.

5. Zero DT. Etiology of dental erosion - extrinsic factors. Euro J Oral Sciences 104: 162-177, 1996.

6. Eccles JD. Dental erosion of non-industrial origin: A clinical survey and classification. J Prosthet Dent 42: 649-653, 1979.

7. Smith BGN, Knight JK. An index for measuring the wear ofteeth. Brit Dent J 156: 435-438, 1984.

8 Oilo G, Dahl BL, Hatle G, Gad A. An index for evaluating tooth wear. Acta Odonto Scand 45: 361-365, 1987.

9. Dahl BL, Oilo G,Andersen A, Bruaset O.The suitability of a new index for the evaluation of dental wear. Odonto Scand 47: 205-210, 1989.

10. Bartlett DW, Coward PY, Nikkah C,Wilson RF. The prevalence of toothwear in a cluster sample of adolescent schoolchildren and its relationship with potential explanatory factors. Brit Dent J 184: 125-129, 1998.

11. Williams D., Croucher R., Marcenes W. and O’Farrell M. The prevalence of dental erosion in the maxillary incisors of 14 year old schoolchildren living in Tower Hamlets in Hackney, London, UK. Internat Dent J 49:211-216, 1999.

12. Lussi A, Schaffner M, Hotz P, Suter P. Dental erosion in a population of swiss adults. Community Dentistry and. Oral Epidemiology 19: 286-290, 1991.

13. Al-Dlaigan YH, Shaw L, Smith A. Dental Erosion in a group of British 14-year old schoolchildren. Part II - Influence of dietary intake. Brit Dent J 190: 258-261, 2001.

14. Al-Majed I, Maguire A, Murray JJ. Risk factors for dental ero-sion in 5-6 year old and 12-14 year old boys in Saudi Arabia. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology 30: 38-46, 2002.

15. Milosevic A, Lennon MA, Fear SC. Risk factors associated with tooth wear in teenagers: a case control study. Community Dent Health 14: 143-147, 1997.

16. Chadwick R G, Mitchell H L, Cameron I, Hunter B and Tulley M. Development of a novel system for assessing tooth and restora-tion wear. J Dent 25: 41-47, 1997.

17. Chadwick RG, Mitchell HL. Conduct of an algorithm in quanti-fying simulated palatal erosion. J Oral Rehab 28: 450-456, 2001.

18. Chadwick R G, Mitchell H L, Ward S. Evaluation of the accura-cy and reproducibility of electroconductive replicas for use in quantitative clinical dental wear studies. J Oral Rehab 29: 540- 545, 2002.

19. Chadwick R G, Mitchell H L, Ward S. A novel approach to eval-uating the reproducibility of electroconductive replicas for use in quantitative clinical dental wear studies. J Oral Rehab 31: 335- 339, 2004.

20. Mitchell H L, Chadwick R G, Ward S, Manton S L. Assessment of a procedure for detecting minute levels of tooth erosion. Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing 41: 464-469, 2003.

21. Ryge G. and Snyder M. Evaluating the clinical quality of restora-tions. JADA 87: 369-378, 1973.

22. BS EN ISO 9001 Model for quality assurance in design, develop-ment, production, installation and servicing. Publ. British Standards Institute, London, UK, 1994.

23. Mitchell H L, Chadwick R G. Mathematical shape matching as a tool in tooth wear assessment - Development and conduct. J Oral Rehab 25:921-928, 1998.

24. Mitchell H L, Chadwick R G. Digital photogrammetric concepts applied to surface deformation studies. Geomatica 53: 405-414, 1999.

25. Chadwick R G, Mitchell H L. Presentation of quantitative tooth-wear data to clinicians. Quint Internat 30:393-398, 1999.

26. Chadwick R G, Mitchell H L and Ward S. Rationalisation of quantitative tooth surface loss data for epidemiological research. J Oral Rehab 31: 42-46, 2004.

27. Linnett V, Seow WK, Connor F, Shepherd R. Oral health of children with gastro-esophageal reflux disease: a controlled study. Austral Dent J 47: 156-162, 2002.

28. Lussi A, Jaeggi T, Schaffner M. Diet and dental erosion. Nutrition 18: 780-781, 2002.

29. Davis WB, Winter PJ. The effect of abrasion on enamel and den-tine after exposure to dietary acids. Brit Dent J 148: 253-256, 1980.

30. Munoz CA, Feller R, Haglund A, Triol CW, Winston AE. Strengthening of tooth enamel by a remineralizing toothpaste after exposure to an acidic soft drink. J Clin Dent 10: 17-21, 1999.

31. MacGregor I D M, Rugg-Gunn AJ. Effect of filming on tooth-brushing performance in uninstructed adults in North East England. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology 14: 320- 322,1986.

32. MacGregor I D M, Rugg-Gunn A J, Gordon P H. Plaque levels in relation to the number of toothbrushing strokes in uninstruct-ed English schoolchildren. J Perio Res 21: 577-582, 1986

33. Parry J, Shaw L, Arnaud MJ, Smith AJ. Investigation of mineral waters and soft drinks in relation to dental erosion. J Oral Rehab 28: 766-772, 2001.

34. Nunn JH, Gordon PH, Morris AJ, Pine CM, Walker A. Dental erosion - changing prevalence? A review of British National children’s surveys. Internat J Paediatr Dent 13: 98-105, 2003.