Article Data

  • Views 2098
  • Dowloads 136

Original Research

Open Access

Long term radiographic study of bilateral second premolars with immature root treated by apexogenesis and apexification

  • Reishi Seo1
  • Kenshi Maki2,*,
  • Akiko Hidaka2
  • Manabu Higuchi1
  • Mitsutka Kimura2

1 Seo Dental Clinic, Kumamoto, Japan

2Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Kyushu Dental College, Kitakyushu, Japan

DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.29.4.w32m46v2308r0455 Vol.29,Issue 4,October 2005 pp.313-316

Published: 01 October 2005

*Corresponding Author(s): Kenshi Maki E-mail: k-maki@kyu-dent.ac.jp

Abstract

A ten-year-old girl broke the central cusps of the mandibular second premolars. The mandibular right second premolar was treated with apexification and the left with apexogenesis. These methods were chosen in view of the presented clinical symptoms, radiographic findings, and outcome of bacterial cul-tures of root canal samples. At postoperative 2 years 8 months, disappearance of the focus, closure of the root canal, and formation of the root apex were observed in both mandibular premolars. The mandibular left second premolar demonstrated a nearly normal root formation and root apex mor-phology. Immediately beneath the extracted pulp, regular, uniform, and thick hard tissue was formed. Meanwhile, in the mandibular right second premolar, root growth was suspended, making the root short, and the contour was constructed in such a way that it encircled the distal apical area from the mesial side forming the root apex.

Cite and Share

Reishi Seo,Kenshi Maki,Akiko Hidaka,Manabu Higuchi,Mitsutka Kimura. Long term radiographic study of bilateral second premolars with immature root treated by apexogenesis and apexification. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2005. 29(4);313-316.

References

1. Ingle JI, Tanitor JF. Endodontics. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, Lea & Febiger, publishers, p. 349, 1985.

2. Tratman EK. An unrecorded form of the simplest type of the dilated composite odontome. Br Dent J 86: 271-275, 1949.

3. Oehlers FAC. The tuberculated premolar. Dent Pract 6: 144-148, 1956.

4. Hill FJ, Bellis WJ. Dens evaginatus, its structure and its manage-ment. Br Dent J 156: 400, 1984.

5. Yip W-K.The prevalence of dens evaginatus. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 38: 80-87, 1974.

6. Chen RS. Conservative management of dens evaginatus. J Endod 10: 253-7, 1984.

7. Ju Y. Dens evaginatus: a difficult diagnostic problem?-J Clin Pediatr Dent 15: 246-8, 1991.

8. Kawata T, Tanne K. Early detection of dens evaginatus appear-ing on the premolars and clinical mnagement: histological study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 26: 199-201, 2002.

9 Koh ET, Ford TR, Kariyawasam SP, Chen NN, Torabinejad M. Prophylactic treatment of dens evaginatus using mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod 27: 540-542, 2001

10. Augsburger RA, Wong MT. Pulp management in dens evagina-tus. J Endod 22 : 323-326, 1996.

11. Saad AY. Calcium hydroxide and apexogenesis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 66: 499-501, 1988.

12. Walia T., Chawla HS, Gauba K. Management of wide open apices in non-vital permanent teeth with Ca(OH)2 paste. J Clin Pediatr Dent 25: 51-56, 2000.

13. Webber RT. Apexogenesis versus apexification. Dent Clin North Am 28: 669-697, 1984.

14. Sheehy EC, Roberts GJ. Use of calcium hydroxide for apical bar-rier formation and healing in non-vital in mature permanent teeth: a review. Br Dent J 183: 241-246, 1997.

Submission Turnaround Time

Top