Flowable resin used as a sealant in molars affected by dental fluorosis: a comparative study

The decline in prevalence and incidence of dental caries in developed countries over the last two decades is considered to be due mainly to the widespread use of fluoride in different forms, but simul-taneously with decline in caries, an increase in dental fluorosis has been reported. The aim of this study was to compare the Conventional Sealant Technique (CST) and Enameloplasty Sealant Technique (EST) using a flowable resin as sealant in molars affected by dental fluorosis. A total of 40 extracted third molars affected by dental fluorosis were divided at random into two groups of 20 teeth each, and Tetric Flow resin was used as sealant. All teeth were studied for lateral adaptation and resin penetra-tion by direct and indirect techniques; all samples were replicated in epoxy resin and were evaluated with Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). The results demonstrated that EST allowed a deeper sealant penetration and a superior sealant adaptation than CST, both in direct and indirect evaluations by SEM. The most important variables being penetration-interface and penetration depth both being statistically significant (p<0.05). The CST did not flow into the bottom of the fissures, leaving spaces that can favor the fracture of the material and initiate the process of dental caries. We conclude that a flowable ceromer is an excellent material alternative to be used as sealant and that EST is quite neces-sary in molars affected by dental fluorosis, the combination of both being a reliable method to be used as primary prevention approach of dental caries in endemic areas of dental fluorosis.

1. Mascarenhas AK. Risk factors for dental fluorosis: a review of the recent literature. Pediatr Dent; 22(4):269-77, 2000.

2. Riordan PJ. Dental fluorosis decline after changes to supplement and toothpaste regimens. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 30:233-240, 2002.

3. Dasheng L, Cutress TW. Endemic fluorosis in Guizhou Province, China. World Health Forum 17:173-174, 1996.

4. Lo GL, Bagramian RA. Prevalence of dental fluorosis in chil-dren in Singapore. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 24:25-27, 1996.

5. Barot VV. Occurrence of endemic fluorosis in human population of North Gujarat, India: human health risk. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 61:303-310, 1998.

6. Loyola-Rodriguez JP, Pozos-Guillén AJ, Hernandez-Guerrero JC, Hernandez-Sierra JF. Fluorosis en dentición temporal en una área de hidrofluorosis endémica. Salud Publica Mex 42:194-200, 2000.

7. Villa AE, Guerrero S, Icaza G, Villalobos J, Anabalon M. Dental fluorosis in Chilean children: evaluation of risk factors. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 26:310-315, 1998.

8. Correia Sampaio F, Ramm von der Fehr F, Arneberg P, Petrucci Gigante D, Hatloy A. Dental fluorosis and nutritional status of 6-to 11-year-old children living in rural areas of Paraiba, Brazil. Caries Res 33:66-73, 1999.

9. Díaz-Barriga F, Leyva R, Quistian J, Loyola-Rodriguez JP, Pozos A, Grimaldo M. Endemic fluorosis in San Luis Potosi, Mexico. IV. Sources of fluoride exposure. Fluoride 30:219-222, 1997.

10. Grimaldo M, Borja-Aburto VH, Ramirez AL, Ponce M, Rosas M, Díaz-Barriga F. Endemic fluorosis in San Luis Potosi, Mexico. Enviromental Research 68:25-30, 1995.

11. García-Godoy F, de Araujo FB. Enhancement of fissure sealant penetration and adaptation: The enameloplasty technique. J Clin Pediatr Dent; 19(1):13-8, 1994.

12. Loesche WJ. Role of Streptococcus mutans in human dental decay. Microbiol Rev.50(4):353-80, 1986.

13. Hamada S, Slade HD. Biology, immunology, and cariogenicity of Streptococcus mutans. Microbiol Rev. 44(2): 331-84, 1980.

14. Horowitz HS, Driscoll WS, Meyers RJ, Heifets SB, Kingman A.A new method for assessing the prevalence of dental fluorosis—the Tooth Surface Index of Fluorosis. J Am Dent Assoc. 109(1): 37-41, 1984.

15. do Rego MA, de Araujo MA. Microleakage evaluation of pit and fissure sealants done with different procedures, materials, and laser after invasive technique. J Clin Pediatr Dent 24(1):63-8, 1999.

16. de Craene GP, Martens C, Dermaut R. The invasive pit-and-fis-sure sealing technique in pediatric dentistry: an SEM study of a preventive restoration. J Dent Child 55(1): 34-42, 1988.

17. Kreulen CM, van Amerongen WE, Borgmeijer PJ, Akerboom HB. Comparison of two methods for evaluating the occlusal mar-ginal adaptation of posterior restorations. ASDC J Dent Child.60(4-5):304-9, 1993.

18. Vineet D, Tandon S. Comparative evaluation of marginal integri-ty of two new fissure sealants using invasive and non-invasive techniques: a SEM study. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 24(4): 291-298, 2000.

19. Loyola-Rodriguez JP, Pozos AJ, Hernandez-Guerrero JC. Bottled beverages as additional sources of exposure to fluoride. Salud Publica Mex 40(5): 438-441, 1998.

20. Kakaboura A, Matthaiou L, Papagiannoulis L. In vitro study of penetration of flowable resin composite and compomer into occlusal fissures. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 3(4): 205-9, 2002.

21. Gwinnett AJ, Ripa LW. Penetration of pit and fissure sealants into conditioned human enamel in vivo. Arch Oral Biol 18(3): 435- 9, 1973.

22. Taylor CL, Gwinnett AJ. A study of the penetration of sealants into pits and fissures. J Am Dent Assoc. 87(6): 1181-8, 1973.

23. Mejare I, Lingstrom P, Peterson LG, Holm AK, Twetman S, Kallestal C, Nordenram G, Lagerlof F, Soder B, Norlund A, Axelsson S, Dahlgren H. Caries-preventive effect of fissure sealants: a systematic review. Acta Odntol Scand 61(6): 321-30, 2004.

24. Chan DC, Summit JB, García-Godoy F, Hilton TJ, Chung KH: Evaluation of different methods for cleaning and preparing occlusal fissures. Oper Dent 24:331-336, 1999.

25. Zervou C, Kugel G, Leone C, Zavras A, Doherty EH, White GE. Enameloplasty effects on microleakage of pit-and-fissure sealants under load: an in vitro study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 24:279-285, 2000.

26. Loyola-Rodriguez JP, García-Godoy F. Antibacterial activity of fluoride release sealants on mutans streptococci. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 20(2): 109-111, 1996.

27. Ateyah N, Akpata E. Factors affecting shear bond strength of composite resin to fluorosed human enamel. Oper Dent 25( ): 216- 22, 2000.

28. Westerman G, Hicks J, Flaitz C. Argon laser curing of fluoride-releasing pit and fissure sealant: in vitro caries development. ASDC J Dent Child 67(6) :385-90, 2000.

29. Perez-Lajarin L, Cortes-Lillo O, García-Ballesta C, Cozar-Hidalgo A. Marginal microleakage of two fissure sealants: a com-parative study. ASDC J Dent Child 70(1): 24-8, 2003.

30. Feigal RJ, Musherure P, Gillespie B, Levy-Polack M, Quelhas I, hebling J. Improved sealant retention with bonding agents: A clinical study of two-bottle and single bottle systems. J Dent Res 79:1850-1856, 2000.