Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
A modified technique on the reattachment of permanent tooth fragments following dental trauma. Case report
1Department of Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology and Implant Biology, Aristotle University of Thessalononiki Greece
DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.30.1.p2611020q2762681 Vol.30,Issue 1,January 2006 pp.29-34
Published: 01 January 2006
*Corresponding Author(s): Aristidis Arhakis E-mail: oaristidis@yahoo.co.uk
Fractured anterior teeth can be restored by adhesive bonding of the fractured fragment to the remain-ing tooth structure. One of the major challenges for the practitioner treating traumatized anterior teeth with immediate fragment reattachment is disguising the fracture line, through the correct use of mask-ing and restorative resins to make the restorations imperceptible to the eye as well as improve the reten-tion of the restoration. This paper discusses a modified technique for reattaching a permanent tooth fragment following dental trauma. The initial procedure involved simple reattachment using light cured composite resin between the fragment and the remnant part of the tooth, without additional preparation. The surplus resin was spread across it in an attempt to optimize marginal seal and improve the aesthetics of the restoration. Finally, after taking into account the occlusion, the lingual surfaces of the teeth were veneered with microfilled composite to improve the retention of the reat-tached fragments.
Konstantinos Arapostathis,Aristidis Arhakis,Sotiris Kalfas. A modified technique on the reattachment of permanent tooth fragments following dental trauma. Case report. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2006. 30(1);29-34.
1. Andreasen JO, Andreasen FM. Textbook and Color Atlas of Traumatic Injuries to the Teeth. 3rd Ed. Copenhagen, Munksgaard, pp. 216–256, 1993.
2. Andreasen JO, Ravn JJ. Epidemiology of traumatic dental injuries to primary and permanent teeth in a Danish population sample. Int J Oral Surg 1: 235–239, 1972.
3. Gutz DP. Fractured permanent incisors in a clinic population. ASDC J Dent Child. 38: 94–95, 1971.
4. Olsburgh S, Jacoby T, Krejci I. Crown fractures in the permanent dentition: pulpal and restorative considerations. Dent Traumatol. 18: 103–115, 2002.
5. Dietschi D. Free-hand composite resin restorations: a key to anterior aesthetics. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 7: 15–25, 1995.
6. Maia EA, Baratieri LN, de Andrada MA, Monteiro S Jr, de Araujo EM Jr. Tooth fragment reattachment: fundamentals of the technique and two case reports. Quintessence Int. 34: 99–107, 2003.
7. Liew VP. Re-attachment of original tooth fragment to a fractured crown. Case report. Aust Dent J. 33: 47–50, 1988.
8. Mader C. Restoration of a fractured anterior tooth. J Am Dent Assoc. 96: 113–115, 1978.
9. Osborne JW, Lambert RL. Reattachment of fractured incisal tooth segment. Gen Dent. 33: 516–517, 1985.
10. Walker M. Fractured-tooth fragment reattachment. Gen Dent. 44: 434–436, 1996.
11. Demarcco FF, Fay RM, Pinzon LM, Powers JM. Fracture resis-tance of re-attached coronal fragments—influence of different adhesive materials and bevel preparation. Dent Traumatol. 20: 157–163, 2004.
12. Worthington RB, Murchison DF, Vandewalle KS. Incisal edge reattachment: the effect of preparation utilization and design. Quintessence Int. 30: 637–643, 1999.
13. Nogueira Filho Gda R, Machion L, Teixeira FB, Pimenta LA, Sallum EA. Reattachment of an autogenous tooth fragment in a fracture with biologic width violation: a case report. Quintessence Int. 33: 181–184, 2002.
14. Rappelli G, Massaccesi C, Putignano A. Clinical procedures for the immediate reattachment of a tooth fragment. Dent Traumatol. 18: 281–284, 2002.
15. Palma-Dibb RG, Taba M Jr, Santos CM, Navarro VP. Autogenous tooth fragment reattachment—association of peri-odontal surgery and endodontic and restorative procedures: a case report. Quintessence Int. 35: 179–184, 2004.
16. Chosack A, Eidelman E. Rehabilitation of a fractured incisor using the patient’s natural crown-case repost. J Dent Chil. 31: 19–21, 1964.
17. Spasser HF. Repair and restoration of a fractured, pulpally involved anterior tooth: report of case. J Am Dent Assoc. 94: 519–520, 1977.
18. Tennery TN. The fractured tooth reunited using the acid-etch bonding technique. Tex Dent J. 96: 16–17, 1978.
19. Starkey PE. Reattachment of a fractured fragment to a tooth-a case report. J Indiana Dent Assoc. 58: 37–38, 1979.
20. Simonsen RJ. Traumatic fracture restoration: an alternative use of the acid etch technique. Quintessence Int. 10: 15–22, 1979.
21. Amir E, Bar-Gil B, Sarnat H. Restoration of fractured immature maxillary central incisors using the crown fragments. Pediatr Dent. 8: 285–288, 1986.
22. Burke FJ. Reattachment of a fractured central incisor tooth frag-ment. Br Dent J. 23: 223–225, 1991.
23. van der Vyver PJ, Marais JT. Reattachment of a fractured tooth fragment: a case report. J Dent Assoc S Afr. 51: 623–624, 1996.
24. Simonsen RJ. Restoration of a fractured central incisor using original tooth fragment. J Am Dent Assoc. 105: 646–648, 1982.
25. Davis MJ, Roth J, Levi M. Marginal integrity of adhesive fracture restorations: chamfer versus bevel. Quintessence Int. 14: 1135–1146, 1983.
26. Andreasen FM, Daugaard-Jensen J, Munksgaard EC. Reinforcement of bonded crown fractured incisors with porce-lain veneers. Endod Dent Traumatol. 7: 78–83, 1991.
27. Reis A, Francci C, Loguercio AD, Carrilho MR, Rodriques Filho LE. Re-attachment of anterior fractured teeth: fracture strength using different techniques. Oper Dent. 26: 287–294, 2001.
28. Diangelis AJ, Jungbluth M. Reattaching fractured tooth seg-ments: an esthetic alternative. J Am Dent Assoc. 123: 58–63, 1992.
29. Fahl N Jr. Optimizing the esthetics of Class IV restorations with composite resins. J Can Dent Assoc. 63: 108-111, 114–115. 1997.
30. Fahl N Jr, Denehy GE, Jackson RD. Protocol for predictable restoration of anterior teeth with composite resins. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 7: 13–21 1995.
31. Andreasen FM, Steinhardt U, Bille M, Munksgaard EC. Bonding of enamel-dentin crown fragments after crown fracture. An experimental study using bonding agents. Endod Dent Traumatol. 9: 111–114, 1993.
32. Kanca J 3rd. Replacement of a fractured incisor fragment over pulpal exposure: a long-term case report. Quintessence Int. 27: 829–832, 1996.
33. Farik B, Munksgaard EC, Andreasen JO, Kreiborg S. Fractured teeth bonded with dentin adhesives with and without unfilled resin. Dent Traumatol. 18: 66–69, 2002.
34. Dean JA, Avery DR, Swartz ML. Attachment of anterior tooth fragments. Pediatr Dent. 8: 139–143, 1986.
35. Reis A, Kraul A, Francci C, de Assis TG, Crivelli DD, Oda M, Loguercio AD. Re-attachment of anterior fractured teeth: frac-ture strength using different materials. Oper Dent. 27: 621–627, 2002.
36. Horsted-Bindslev P. Monkey pulp reactions to cavities treated with Gluma Dentin Bond and restored with a microfilled com-posite. Scand J Dent Res. 95: 347–355, 1987.
37. Robertson A, Robertson S, Nóren JG.A retrospextive evaluation of traumatized-permanent teeth. Int J Paediatr Dent.7: 217–226, 1997.
38. Browning WD, Dennison JB. A survey of failure modes in com-posite resin restorations. Oper Dent. 21: 160–166, 1996.
39. Willems G, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Celis JP, Vanherle G. A clas-sification of dental composites according to their morphological and mechanical characteristics. Dent Mater. 8: 310–319, 1992.
40. Forss H, Seppa L, Lappalainen R. In vitro abrasion resistance and hardness of glass-ionomer cements. Dent Mater. 7: 36–39, 1991.
41. Carfagna C, Guerra G, Nicolais L, Tartaro S. Effects of postcur-ing and water sorption on the mechanical properties of compos-ite dental restorative materials. Biomaterials. 4: 228–229, 1983.
42. Small IC, Watson TF, Chadwick AV, Sidhu SK. Water sorption in resin-modified glass-ionomer cements: an in vitro comparison with other materials. Biomaterials. 19: 545–50, 1998.
43. Smales RJ, Gerke DC. Clinical evaluation of light-cured anterior resin composites over periods of up to 4 years. Am J Dent. 5: 208–212, 1992.
44. Andreasen FM, Noren JG, Andreasen JO, Engelhardtsen S, Lindh-Stromberg U. Long-term survival of fragment bonding in the treatment of fractured crowns: a multicenter clinical study. Quintessence Int. 26: 669–681, 1995.
45. Liebenberg WH. Reattachment of coronal fragments: operative considerations for the repair of anterior teeth. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 9: 761–772 1997.
46. Small BW. Emergency reattachment of fractured tooth. Using dentin bonding agent and flowable composite. Oral Health. 86: 33, 1996.
47. Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. The 5-year clinical performance of direct composite additions to cor-rect tooth form and position. II. Marginal qualities. Clin Oral Investig. 1: 19–26, 1997.
48. Say EC, Altundal H, Kaptan F. reattachment of a fractured max-illary tooth: A case report. Quintessence Int 35: 601–604, 2004
49. Reis A, Loguercio AD, Kraul A, Matson E. Reattachment of fractured teeth: a review of literature regarding techniques and materials. Oper Dent. 29: 226–233, 2004.
50. Baratieri LN, Monteiro S Jr, Andrada MAC. Esthetics: Direct adhesive restorations on fractured anterior teeth. Chicago Quintessence Books, 135–205, 1998
51. Demarco FF, Fay RM, Pinzon LM, Powers JM. Fracture resis-tance of re-attached coronal fragments—influence of different adhesive materials and bevel preparation. Dent Traumatol. 20: 157–163, 2004.
52. Munksgaard EC, Hojtved L, Jorgensen EH, Andreasen JO, Andreasen FM. Enamel-dentin crown fractures bonded with various bonding agents. Endod Dent Traumatol. 7: 73–77, 1991.
Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.
Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.
Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.
JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.
Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.
BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.
Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.
Scopus: CiteScore 1.8 (2023) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.
Top