Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Colony Forming Unit Levels of Salivary Lactobacilli and Streptococcus mutans In Orthodontic Patients
1Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Hebrew University-Hadassah School of Dental Medicine
2,
DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.30.1.wxp4870177030826 Vol.30,Issue 1,January 2006 pp.51-54
Published: 01 January 2006
*Corresponding Author(s): Ari Kupietzky E-mail: drkup@netvision.net.il
he purpose of this study was to compare the levels of Lactobacilli (LB) and Streptococcus mutans (SM) colony forming units (CFU) in the saliva of subjects before and after orthodontic appliance placement.This was a controlled, prospective two-group, two-measurement, clinical trial performed on 64 study patients, 12-15 years old. Subjects in the experimental group were sampled for LB and SM in stimulated saliva collected on the same day but prior to band and bracket placement. The subjects in the control group were sampled on their first screening appointment two months prior to band and bracket placement. The second samples of LB and SM were taken from the experimental and control groups after two months. Saliva was transferred to a selective agar carrier and incubated for 48 hours at 37°C / 99 °F. LB and SM colonies forming units were compared with standard densities.The exper-imental group wearing orthodontic appliances had significantly higher mean LB CFU counts than the control group at the 2 month follow- up (3.25 vs. 2.57, p =0.0036). The two groups, however, did not show any difference in mean SM CFU counts at the 2 month follow-up (3.0 vs. 3.1, p = 0.66).
The results of this study showed that a higher number of CFUs of LB were associated with the group wearing orthodontic appliances after two months and may play a role in the increased lev-els of plaque seen in many orthodontic patients.
Ari Kupietzky,Amith K. Majumdar,Zia Shey,Robert Binder,Pamela B. Matheson. Colony Forming Unit Levels of Salivary Lactobacilli and Streptococcus mutans In Orthodontic Patients. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2006. 30(1);51-54.
1. Wisth PJ, Nord A: Caries experience in orthodontically treated individuals. Angle Orthod 47:59–64, 1977.
2. O’Reilly MM, Featherstone JD. Demineralization and reminer-alization around orthodontic appliances: an in vivo study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 92: 33–40, 1987.
3. Eliades T, Eliades G, Brantley WA. Microbial attachment on orthodontic appliances: I. Wettability and early pellicle forma-tion on bracket materials. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 108: 351–60, 1995.
4. Ahn S J, Kho H S, Lee S W, Nahm D S. Roles of salivary proteins in the adherence of oral streptococci to various orthodontic brackets. J Dent Res81(6): 411–5, 2002.
5. Borgstrom MK, Sullivan A, Granath L, Nilsson G: On the pHlowering potential of lactobacilli and mutans streptococci from dental plaque related to the prevalence of caries. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 25: 165–9, 1997.
6. Alaluusua S.: Transmission of mutans streptococci. Proc. Finn. Dent. Soc. 87: 443–44, 1991.
7. Kneist S, Laurisch L, R, Heinrich-Weltzien R, Stösser L: A mod-ified mitis salivarius medium for a caries diagnostic test; J. Dent. Res77: 970 (Abstr. 2712), 1998.
8. Stecksen-Blicks C: Salivary counts of lactobacilli and Streptococcus mutans in caries prediction. Scand. J. Dent. Res. 93: 204–212, 1985.
9. Thylstrup A, Fejerskov O: Textbook of Clinical Cariology, Second edition. Munksgaard, Copenhagen: 15, 64, 90, 1994.
10. Brock TD, Madigan MT, Martinko JM: Biology of Microorganisms, seventh edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ; Prentice Hall; 402–403, 1994.
11. Prescott LM, Harley JP, Klein DA: Microbiology, fifth edition.l, Boston, MA; McGraw Hill; 526, 529, 620, 934, 2002.
12. Fournier A, Payant L, Bouclin R: Adherence of Streptococcus mutans to orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.; 114:414–7, 1998.
Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.
Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.
Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.
JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.
Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.
BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.
Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.
Scopus: CiteScore 1.8 (2023) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.
Top