Article Data

  • Views 2097
  • Dowloads 160

Original Research

Open Access

Short Resin-posts Bonding to Primary Dentin. Microleakage and Micro-morphological an in vitro study.

  • Ferreira MC1,*,
  • Kummer TR1
  • Vieira RS2
  • Calvo MCM3

1Pediatric Dentistry, postgraduate PhD student in the Santa Catarina Federal University

2Pediatric Dentistry Division, Santa Catarina Federal University

3Health Division, Santa Catarina University

DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.31.3.4r3k450476553211 Vol.31,Issue 3,May 2007 pp.202-206

Published: 01 May 2007

*Corresponding Author(s): Ferreira MC E-mail: rvieira@ccs.ufsc.br

Abstract

The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the adhesion of two bonding systems (Single Bond and Adper Prompt L Pop, 3M ESPE) to short resin posts in the root dentin of primary teeth. Statistical analysis (Mann Whitney) revealed that there were no statistically significant differences between the materials (p= 0.75), but the Single Bond group presented a wider resin-dentin inter-diffusion zone (RDIZ). Both groups showed long resin tags. It was concluded that although Single Bond produced a wider adhesive interface than Adper Prompt L Pop, leakage levels occurred in both systems.

Keywords

tooth, primary, dentin-bonding agents, dental posts, microscopy, electron, scanning

Cite and Share

Ferreira MC,Kummer TR,Vieira RS,Calvo MCM. Short Resin-posts Bonding to Primary Dentin. Microleakage and Micro-morphological an in vitro study.. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2007. 31(3);202-206.

References

1. Wanderley MT, Ferreira SLM, Rodrigues CRMD, Filho LER. Primary anterior tooth restoration using posts with macro-retentive elements. Quintessence Int 30:432-436, 1999.

2. Pithan S, Vieira RS, Chain MC. Tensile bond strength of intra canal posts in primary anterior teeth: an in vitro study. J Clin Ped Dent 27:35-9, 2002.

3. Alves FBT, Vieira RS. Effects of eugenol and non-eugenol endodontic fillers on short post retention in primary anterior teeth: an in vitro study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 29:211-214, 2005.

4. Kaaden C, Schmalz G, Powers JM. Morphological characterization of the resin-dentin interface in primary teeth. Clin Oral Invest;7:235-40, 2003.

5. Van Meerbeek B, Perdigão J, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. The clinical performance of adhesives. J Dent 26:1-20, 1998.

6. Tay FR, Pashley DH. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching sys-tems. I: Depth of penetration beyond dentin smear layers. Dent Mater 17:296-308, 2001.

7. Atash R, Abbeele AV. Sealing ability of new generation adhesive sys-tems in primary teeth: an in vitro study. Pediatr Dent 26:322-328, 2004.

8. Santini A, Plasschaert AJ, Mitchell S. Effect of composite resin place-ment techniques on the microleakage of two self-etching dentin-bond-ing agents. Am J Dent 14:132-136, 2001.

9. Cardoso PE, Plácido E, Francci CE, Perdigão J. Microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations using five simplified adhesive sys-tems. Am J Dent 12:291-294, 1999.

10. Nakabayashi N, Saimi Y. Bonding to intact dentin. J Dent Res 75:1706-15,1996.

11. Stalin A, Varma BR, Jayanthi. Comparative evaluation of tensile-bond strength, fracture mode and microleakage of fifth, and sixth generation adhesive systems in primary dentition. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 23:83-88, 2005.

12. Casagrande L, Brayner R, Barata JS, Araújo FB. Cervical microleakage in composite restorations of primary teeth – in vitro study. J Dent 33:627-632, 2005.

13. Schmitt DC, Lee J. Microleakage of adhesive resin systems in the pri mary and permanent dentitions. J Pediatr Dent 24:587-593, 2002.

14. El-Housseiny AA, Farsi N. Sealing ability of a single bond adhesive in primary teeth. An in vivo study. Int J Paediatr Dent 12:265-270, 2002.

15. Sano H, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Horner JA, Matthews WG, Pashley DH. Nanoleakage, leakage within the hybrid layer. Operat Dent 20:18-25, 1995.

16. da Silva Telles PD, Machado MAAM, Nör JE. SEM study of a self-etching primer adhesive system used for dentin bonding in primary and permanent teeth. Pediatr Dent 20:315-320, 2001.

17. Perdigão J, Ramos JC, Lambrechts P. In vitro interfacial relationship between human dentin and one-bottle dental adhesives. Dent Mat 13:218-27, 1997.

18. Asakawa T, Manabe A, Itoh K, Inoue M, Hisamitu H, Sasa R Efficacy of dentin adhesives in primary and permanent teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent 25:231-236, 2001.

19. Inoue S,Van Meerbeek B,Vargas M,Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P,Vanherle G. Adhesion mechanism of self-etching adhesives. In: Tagami J, Toledano M, Prati C (eds) Proceedings of 3rd International Kuraray Symposium on Advanced Adhesive Dentistry. Grafiche Erredue, Como, 2000.

20. Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL. Complete marginal seal of class V resin composite restorations effected by increased flexibility. J Dent Res 69:1240-1243, 1990.

21. Frankenberger R, Perdigão J, Rosa BT, Lopes M. ‘No-bottle’ vs ‘multi-bottle’ dentin adhesives – a microtensile bond strength and morpholog-ical study. Dent Mat 17:373-380, 2001.

22. Watanabe I, Nakabayashi N, Pashley DH. Bonding to ground dentin by a phenyl-P self-etching primer. J Dent Res 73: 1212-20, 1994.

23. Prati C, Chersoni S, Mongiorgi R, Pashley DH. Resin-infiltrated dentin layer formation of new bonding systems. Operat Dent 23:185-194, 1998.

24. Hume WR. Influence of dentine on the pulp release of eugenol or acids from restorative materials. J Oral Rehabil 21:469-73, 1994.

25. Nör JE, Feigal RJ, Dennison JB, Edwards CA. Dentin bonding: SEM comparison of the dentin surface in primary and permanent teeth. Pediatr Dent 75:1396-1403, 1996.

26. Brackett WW, Huget EF. The effect of etchant and cement age on the adhesion of resin composite to conventional and resin-modified glass ionomer cements. Quintessence Int 27:57-61, 1996.

Submission Turnaround Time

Top