Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Effect of Cut-Off Points on Performance of Laser Fluorescence for Detecting Occlusal Caries
1Departamento de Odontopediatria – Faculdade de Odontologia – Universidade de São Paulo Av, São Paulo, Brazil
DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.32.1.g4n5274h20184535 Vol.32,Issue 1,January 2008 pp.33-36
Published: 01 January 2008
*Corresponding Author(s): Mariana M Braga E-mail: mmbraga@usp.br
This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the influence of cut-off points on the performance of laser fluorescence(LF) in detecting occlusal caries in permanent and primary teeth. The use of different cut-off points influenced the performance of LF device in detection of occlusal caries in both kind of teeth, but the performance in permanent teeth suffered more influence from variation of cut-off points scales than in primary group.
occlusal caries, laser fluorescence, DIAGNOdent, cut-off points, primary teeth, permanent teeth
Mariana M Braga,Fausto M Mendes,José Carlos P Imparato,Célia R M D Rodrigues. Effect of Cut-Off Points on Performance of Laser Fluorescence for Detecting Occlusal Caries. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2008. 32(1);33-36.
1. Nyvad B. Diagnosis versus detection of caries. Caries Res 38: 192–198, 2004.
2. Kielbassa AM. Current challenges in caries diagnosis. Quintessence Int 37: 421, 2006.
3. Hibst R, Paulus R, Lussi A. Detection of occlusal caries by laser fluo-rescence: basic and clinical investigations. Med Laser Appl 16: 205–213, 2001.
4. Attrill DC, Ashley PF. Occlusal caries detection in primary teeth: a com-parison of DIAGNOdent with conventional methods. Br Dent J 190: 440–443, 2001.
5. Alwas-Danowska HM, Plasschaert AJM, Suliborski S, Verdonschot EH. Reliability and validity issues of laser fluorescence measurements in occlusal caries diagnosis. J Dent 30: 129–134, 2002.
6. Antonnen V, Seppä L, Hausen H. Clinical study of the use of the laser fluorescence device DIAGNOdent for detection of occlusal caries in children. Caries Res 37: 17–23, 2003.
7. Rocha RO, Ardenghi TM, Oliveira LB, Rodrigues CRMD, Ciamponi AL. In vivo effectiveness of laser fluorescence compared to visual inspection and radiography for detection of occlusal caries in primary teeth. Caries Res 37: 437–441, 2003.
8. Côrtes DF, Ellwood RP, Ekstrand KR. An in vitro comparison of a com-bined FOTI/visual examination of occlusal caries and other caries diag-nostic methods and the effect of stain on their diagnostic performance. Caries Res 37: 8–16, 2003.
9. Antonnen V, Seppä L, Hausen H. A follow-up study of the use of DIAGNOdent for monitoring fissure caries in children. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 32: 312–318, 2004.
10. Lussi A, Imwinkelried S, Pitts N, Longbottom C, Reich E. Performance and reproducitibility of a laser fluorescence system for detection of occlusal caries in vitro. Caries Res 33: 261–266, 1999.
11. Baseren NM, Gokalp S. Validity of a laser fluorescence system (DIAGNOdent) for detection of occlusal caries in third molars: an in vitro study. J Oral Rehabilit 30: 1190–1194, 2003.
12. Shi XQ, Welander U, Angmar-Mansson B. Occlusal caries detection with KaVo DIAGNOdent and radiography: an in vitro comparison. Caries Res 34: 151–158, 2000.
13. Bader JD, Shugars DA. A systematic review of the performance of a laser fluorescence device for detecting caries. J Am Dent Assoc 135: 1413–1426, 2004.
14. Francescut P, Lussi A. Correlation between fissure discoloration, Diagn-odent measurements, and caries depth: an in vitro study. Pediatr Dent 25: 559–564, 2003.
15. Ástvldsdóttir A, Holbrook P, Tranaeus S. Consistency of DIAGNOdent instruments for clinical assessment of fissure caries. Acta Odontol Scand 62: 193–198, 2004.
16. Mendes FM, Hissadomi M, Imparato JCP. Effects of drying time and presence of plaque on the in vitro performance of laser fluorescence in occlusal caries of primary teeth. Caries Res 38: 104–108, 2004.
17. Fung L, Smales R, Ngo H, Mount G. Diagnostic comparison of three groups of examiners using visual and laser fluorescence methods to detect oclusal caries in vitro. Aust Dent J 49: 67–71, 2004.
18. El-Housseiny AA, Jamjoum H. Evaluation of visual, explorer, and a laser device for detection of early occlusal caries. J Clin Pediatr Dent 26: 41–48, 2001.
19. Shi XQ, Tranaeus S, Angmar-Mansson B. Validation of DIAGNOdent for quantification of smooth surface: an in vitro study. Acta Odontol Scand 59: 74–78, 2001.
20. Mendes FM, Pinheiro SL, Bengston AL. Effect of alteration in organic material of occlusal caries on DIAGNOdent readings. Braz Oral Res 18, 141–144, 2004.
21. Burin C, Burin C, Loguercio AD, Grande RH, Reis A. Occlusal caries detection: a comparison of laser fluorescence system and conventional methods. Pediatr Dent 27: 307–312, 2005.
22. Reis A, Mendes FM, Angnes V, Angnes G, Grande RHM, Loguercio AD. Performance of methods of occlusal caries detection in permanent teeth under clinical and laboratory conditions. J Dent 34: 1–8, 2006.
23. Sheehy EC, Brailsford SR, Kidd EA, Beighton D, Zortopoulos L. Com-parison between visual examination and a laser fluorescence system for a in vivo diagnosis of occlusal caries. Caries Res 35: 421–426, 2001.
24. Bader JD, Shugars DA, Bonito AJ. Systematic reviews of selected den-tal caries diagnostic and management methods. J Dent Educ 65: 960–968, 2001.
25. Horowitz AM. A report on the NIH consensus development conference on diagnosis and management of dental caries throughout life. J Dent Res 83: C15–C17, 2004.
26. Ashley P. Diagnosis of occlusal caries in primary teeth. Int J Paediatr Dent 10: 166–171, 2000.
27. Mortimer KV. The relationship of deciduous enamel structure to dental disease. Caries Res 4: 206–223, 1970.
28. Shellis RP. Relationship between human enamel structure and the for-mation of caries-like lesions in vitro. Arch Oral Biol 29: 975–981, 1984.
29. Ketley CE, Holt RD. Visual and radiographic diagnosis of occlusal caries in first permanent molars and in second primary molars. Br Dent J 174: 364–370, 1993.
Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.
Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.
Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.
JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.
Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.
BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.
Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.
Scopus: CiteScore 1.8 (2023) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.
Top