Article Menu

Export Article

More by Authors Links

Article Data

  • Views 1929
  • Dowloads 114

Original Research

Open Access

Predicting the size of unerupted canines and premolars of the maxillary and mandibular quadrants in an Iranian population

  • Hosseinzadeh nik. Tahere1,*,
  • Shalchi. Majid2
  • Mohandes. Fateme3
  • Kharazi fard3
  • Mohammad Javad3

1Orthodontic department, Dental school and Dental research center, Tehran medical sciences university, Tehran, Iran

2Dentist, Private practice

3Research fellow, Dental Research Center, Tehran medical sciences university.Tehran, Iran

DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.32.1.r066201525862144 Vol.32,Issue 1,September 2007 pp.43-48

Published: 01 September 2007

*Corresponding Author(s): Hosseinzadeh nik. Tahere E-mail: hoseinit@tums.ac

PDF (92.16 kB) View Full-text

Abstract

The aim of this investigation was to examine the accuracy of Moyers probability tables and the Tanaka and Johnston prediction equations in predicting the size of unerupted canines and premolars of the maxillary and mandibular quadrants in an Iranian population and to derive a standard formula for it.

Methods. Out of a sample of 280 subjects, 50 (25 males and 25 females) were selected by specific inclusion criteria. An electronic digital caliper was used to read the nearest 0.01mm. The teeth measurements derived were compared with those predicted from Tanaka Johnston equations and Moyers probability tables and then standard regression were developed.

Results. Tanaka and Johnston regression equations overestimate the mesiodistal width of permanent canines and premolars. There were no statistically significant differences between actual mesiodistal width of canines and premolars and the predicted width from Moyers charts at 65% for the lower and upper arches in male subjects and for the lower arch in females but none of the probabilities has good accuracy for the upper arch in females. For the newly developed regression equations, the correlation coefficients between the sum of the mandibular incisors and the sum of the canine and premolars were 0.709 (for lower) and 0.539 (for upper) in subjects.

Conclusions: Tanaka and Johnston overestimate the actual size for Iranian teeth widths. Moyers method can be used at 65% probability level for male subjects and at the 75% and 85% level for upper arch and the 50%and 65% level for lower arch in female subjects.

Keywords

Moyers, Tanaka and Johnston, Tooth size prediction

Cite and Share

Hosseinzadeh nik. Tahere,Shalchi. Majid,Mohandes. Fateme,Kharazi fard,Mohammad Javad. Predicting the size of unerupted canines and premolars of the maxillary and mandibular quadrants in an Iranian population. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2007. 32(1);43-48.

URL:

https://www.jjocpd.com/articles/10.17796/jcpd.32.1.r066201525862144

References

1. Proffit WR, Fields HW, Ackerman. Contemporary Orthodontics. (third Ed.) Mosby-year book, Inc, 2000.

2. Garn SM, Lewis AB, Kerewsky RS. X-Linked inheritance of tooth size. J Dent Res 44: 439–441, 1965.

3. Towsend GC, Brown T. Inheritance of tooth size in Australian aborig-ines, Am J Phys Anthropol 48: 305–331, 1978.

4. Moyers RE. Handbook of Orthodontics. 3rd ed. Chicago: year book, 369–79, 1973.

5. Tanaka MM. Johnston LE. The Prediction of the Size of Unerupted Canine and Premolars in a Contemporary Orthodontic Population. J Am Dent Assoc 88(4): 798–801, 1974.

6. Seipel CM. Variation of tooth positron. A Metric Study of the Variation and Adaptation in the Deciduous and Permanent Dentitions. Sversk Tan-diak Tidiski 39: Sep 26, 1946.

7. Moorrees CFA, Thomsen SQ, Jensen E, Yen PKE Mesiodistal Crown diameters of the deciduas and Permanent Teeth in individuals. J Dent Res 36(1): 39–47, 1957.

8. Al-Khadra BH. Prediction of the size of un-erupted canines and premo-lars in a Saudi Arab population. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 104(4): 369–72, 1993.

9. Lee-Chan S. Jacobsen BN, Chwa KH, Jacobson RS. Mixed dentition analysis for Asian-Americans. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 113: 293–299, 1998.

10. Yuen KK, Tang EL, So LL. Mixed dentition analysis for Hong Kong Chinese. Angle Orthod 68: 21–28, 1998.

11. Bishara SE, Jakobsen JR. Comparison of two non radiographic method of predicting permanent tooth size in the mixed dentition. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 114(5): 573–576, 1998.

12. Schirmer UR, Wiltshire WA. Orthodontic probability tables for black patients of African descent: mixed dentition analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 112: 545–551, 1997.

13. Hashim HA, AL-Shalan, T. Prediction of the size of un-erupted perma-nent cuspids and bicuspids in a Saudi sample: A pilot study. J Contemp Dent Pract 4(4): 040–053, 2003.

14. Bishara SE. Text Book of Orthodontics. 1st ed; Saunders, 2001.

15. Kieser JA. Fluetuating odontometric asymmetry and material alcohol consumption. Ann Hum Biol 19(5): 513–520, 1992.

16. Abu Alhaija ESJ, Qudeimat MA. Mixed dentition space analysis in a Jordanian Population: of two methods. Int J Paediat Dent 16: 104–110, 2006.

17. Diagne F, Diop-Ba K, Ngom PI, Mbow K. Mixed dentition analysis in a Senegalese population: elaboration of prediction tables. Am J Orthod and Dentofac Orthop 124: 178–183, 2003.

18. Jaroontham J, Godfrey K. Mixed dentition space analysis in a Thai population. Eu J Orthod 22: 127–134, 2000.

Submission Turnaround Time

Top