Article Data

  • Views 1108
  • Dowloads 163

Original Research

Open Access

Developmental Anomalies of Permanent Lateral Incisors in Young Patients

  • Yuko Fujita1
  • Akiko Hidaka1
  • Ikuko Nishida1
  • Kazumasa Morikawa1
  • Daisuke Hashiguchi1
  • Kenshi Maki1,*,

1Division of Developmental Stomatognathic Function Science, Department of Growth and Development of Functions, Kyushu Dental College, Kitakyushu, Japan

DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.33.3.c74j49r738676671 Vol.33,Issue 3,May 2009 pp.211-216

Published: 01 May 2009

*Corresponding Author(s): Kenshi Maki E-mail: k-maki@kyu-dent.ac.jp

Abstract

Objective: To elucidate the prevalence of developmental anomalies of permanent lateral incisors among young patients in Japan. Study deign: A total of 1375 patients were observed between 1990 and 2008 at the Department of Pediatric Dentistry in the Kyushu Dental College Hospital and four private pediatric dental clinics in Kitakyushu City. Panoramic and periapical radiographs were examined for all those patients aged 5 to 19 years. Results: The prevalence of agenesis of the lateral incisors was 7.3% (100 patients), with more girls than boys being affected. The prevalence rates of absent upper and lower lateral incisors were 2.7 and 4.8 % (34 and 63 patients), respectively. Nine (0.7 %) of the total patients had microdontia. Eruption disturbance was present in five patients (0.4 %). Two of five patients presented with a disturbed eruption owing to an odontoma or a supernumerary tooth. Conclusion: In our study, the prevalence of agenesis of the lateral incisors was higher in Japanese children than in other populations, and eruption disturbance occurred less frequently than agenesis and microdontia. Nevertheless, the early differential diagnosis of an eruption disturbance is important in order to begin appropriate treatment at the optimal time.

Keywords

lateral incisors/congenitally missing teeth/microdontia/eruption disturbance

Cite and Share

Yuko Fujita,Akiko Hidaka,Ikuko Nishida,Kazumasa Morikawa,Daisuke Hashiguchi,Kenshi Maki. Developmental Anomalies of Permanent Lateral Incisors in Young Patients. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2009. 33(3);211-216.

References

1. Muller TP, Hill IN, Peterson AC, Blayney JR. A survey of congenitally missing permanent teeth. J Am Dent Assoc, 81: 101–107, 1970.

2. Polder BJ, Van’t Hof MA, Van der Linden FP, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. A meta-analysis of the prevalence of dental agenesis of permanent teeth. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 32: 217–226, 2004.

3. Endo T, Ozoe R, Kubota M, Akiyama M, Shimooka S. A survey of hypodontia in Japanese orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 129: 29–35, 2006.

4. Stamatiou J, Symons AL. Agenesis of the permanent lateral incisor: distribution, number and sites. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 15: 244–246, 1991.

5. Niswander JD, Sujaku C. Congenital anomalies of teeth in Japanese children. Am J Phys Anthropol, 21: 569–574, 1963.

6. Davis PJ. Hypodontia and hyperdontia of permanent teeth in Hong Kong schoolchildren. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 15: 218–201, 1987.

7. Pinho T, Tavare P, Maciel P, Pollmann C. Developmental absence of maxillary lateral incisors in the Portuguese population. Eur J Orthod, 27: 443–449, 2005.

8. Shaw WC, Addy M, Ray C. Dental and social effects of malocclusion and effectivenessof orthodontic treatment: a review. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 8: 36–45, 1980.

9. Hobkir, JA, Goodman JR, Jones SP. Presenting complaints and findings in a group of patients attending a hypodontia clinic. Br Dent J, 177: 337–339, 1994.

10. Bondemark L, Tsiopa J. Prevalence of ectopic eruption, impaction, retention and agenesis of the permanent second molar. Angle Orthod, 77: 773–778, 2007.

11. Silva Meza R. Radiographic assessment of congenitally missing teeth in orthodontic patients. Int J Paediatr Dent, 13: 112–116, 2003.

12. Altug-Atac AT, Erdem D. Prevalence and distribution of dental anom-alies in orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 131: 510–514, 2007.

13. Tavajohi-Kermani H, Kapur R, Sciote JJ. Tooth agenesis and craniofa-cial morphology in an orthodontic population. Am J Orthod Dentofa-cial Orthop, 122: 39–47, 2002.

14. Magnússon TE. Prevalence of hypodontia and malformations of per-manent teeth in Iceland. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 5: 173–178, 1977.

15. Bäckman B, Wahlin YB. Variations in number and morphology of per-manent teeth in 7-year-old Swedish children. Int. J. Paediatr. Dent,. 11: 11–17, 2001.

16. Clayton, JM. Congenital dental anomalies occurring in 3,557 children. J Den Children, 23: 206–208, 1957.

17. Cho SY, Ki Y, Chu V, Chan J. Concomitant developmental dental anom-alies in Chinese children with dens evaginatus. Int J Paediatr Dent, 16: 247–251, 2006.

18. Betts A, Camilleri GE. A review of 47 cases of unerupted maxillary incisors. Int J Paediatr Dent, 9: 285–292, 1999.

19. Batra P, Duggal R, Kharbanda OP, Parkash H. Orthodontic treatment of impacted anterior teeth due to odontomas: a report of two cases. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 28: 289–294, 2004.

20. Cozza P, Gatto R, Marino A, Mucedero M. Case report: two nasal floor compound odontomas associated with impacted maxillary incisor. Eur J Paediatr Dent, 4: 99–102, 2003.

21. Ochoa Grijalva JF, Kuster CG. Supernumerary teeth removal and orthodontic tooth repositioning: a case report. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 17: 95–98, 1993.

22. Dachi SF, Howell FV. A survey of 3, 874 routine full-month radi-ographs. II. A study of impacted teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 14: 1165–1169, 1961.

23. Shar RM, Boyd MA, Vakil TF. Studies of permanent tooth anomalies in 7,886 Canadian individuals. 1: Impacted teeth. J Can Dent Assoc, 44: 262–264, 1978.

24. Ericson S, Kurol J. Radiographic assessment of maxillary canine erup-tion in children with clinical signs of eruption disturbance. Eur J Orthod, 8: 133–140, 1986.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 1.8 (2023) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top