The Influence of an Oral Health Education Program Provided in a Community Dental Clinic on the Prevalence of Caries Among 12-14 Year-Old Children

Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of an oral health education program when given in a public dental clinic, by assessing caries and restorations.

Methods: This was done by assessing changes in caries prevalence in the mouth of children aged 12 to 14 year- old. Data was obtained from files of patients treated in the Dental Volunteers for Israel (DVI) clinic in Jerusalem. Children must prove understanding and also application of what they learned in the educational program in order to receive restorative dental treatment.

Results: 280 children were included in the intervention group. The control group constituted 173 children who had never had any restorative treatment in the DVI clinic. The extent of caries surfaces differed greatly between the intervention and the control groups. 35.2% of the control group, and as many as 64% of the intervention group had low caries (DMFS< 3). The situation is reversed when comparing the difference in the restored teeth surfaces between the two groups- 56.6% of the control group had no restorations and 66.2% of the children in the intervention group had treated teeth. DMFS scores reveal fewer differences between the two groups. The mean carious surface was 1.8 times greater in the control group, and the restored surfaces were 2.1 times greater for the intervention children. Nevertheless when comparing DMFS means between control and intervention groups t-test result shows no statistical significant difference for the slightly lower DMFS levels in the intervention group.

Conclusions: This study shows that even a comprehensive preventive program given by professional personnel,followed by free dental treatment, is not enough to improve dental health status for children from a lower socioeconomic class. Still, a consideration of the ethical responsibility of the profession to educate children about oral diseases and their prevention should be carried out, irrespective of the implementation of the knowledge.

oral health, tooth decay, community dental clinic

1. Bowen HW, Tabak AL. Cariology for the Ninetees. University of Rochester Press, 1993; 37–59.

2. Vanobbergen J, Declerck D, Mwalili S, Martens L. The effectiveness of a 6-year oral health education program for primary schoolchildren. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 32: 173–82, 2004.

3. Ellwood RP, Davies GM, Worthington HV, Blinkhorn AS, Taylor GO, and Davies RM. Relationship between are deprivation and the anti-caries benefit of an oral health program providing free fluoride tooth-paste to young children. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 32: 159–65, 2004.

4. Graves RC, Abernathy JR, Disney JA, Stamm JW, Bohannan HM. The University of North Carolina Caries Risk Assessment Study 3: Multi-ple Factors in Caries Prevalence. J Public Health Dent, 51: 134–43, 1991.

5. US Department of Health and Human Services: Oral health in Amer-ica: a report of the Surgeon General, Rockville, Md, 2000, US Depart-ment of Health and Human Services, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National institutes of Health.

6. Zusman SP, Ramon T, Natapov L, Kooby E. Dental health of 12-year-olds in Israel-2002. Community Dent Health, 22: 175–9, 2002.

7. Kay EJ, Locker D. Is dental health education effective? A systematic review of current evidence. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 24: 231–5, 1996.

8. Johnson, N.W. Risk Markers for Oral Diseases. Vol. 1. Dental caries. Cambridge University Press, 111, 1991.

9. Mcdonald, RE. Avery, DR. and Stookey, GK. Dental caries in the child and adolescent. In:Dentistry for the child and adolescent. Ed: Mcdon-ald, RE. Avery, DR. and Dean JA.. Mosby, Inc. Missouri, USA, 203–235, 2004.

10. Frencken JE, Borsum-Andersson K, Makoni F, Moyana F, Mwashaenyi S, Mulder J. Effectiveness of an oral health education program in pri-mary schools in Zimbabwe after 3.5 years. Community Dent Oral Epi-demiol, 29: 253–9, 2001.

11. Harris, O.N., Christen, G.A. Primary Preventive Dentistry. 4th ed. Appleton & Lange, 1–15, 157–184, 1995.

12. Rozier RG, Effectiveness of methods used by dental professionals for the primary prevention of dental caries. J Dent Educ, 65: 1063–72, 2001.

13. Hartono SW, Lambri SE, van-Palenstein-Helderman WH. Effective-ness of primary school-based oral health education in west java, Indonesia. Int Dent J, 52: 137–43, 2002.

14. Petersen PE, Peng B, Tai B, Bian Z, Fan M. Effect of a school-based oral health education program in Wuhan city, People’s Republic of China. Int Dent J, 54: 33–41, 2004.

15. Milsom K, Blinkhorn A, Worthington H, Threlfall A, Buchanan K, Kearney-Mitchell P, et.al. The effectiveness of School dental screening: a cluster-randomized control trial. J Dent Res, 8: 924–8, 2006.

16. Vrbic V. Reasons for the caries decline in slovenia. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 28: 126–32, 2000.

17. Buischi Y, Axelsson P, Oliveira LB, Mayer M, Gjrmo P. Effect of two preventive programs on oral health knowledge and habits among Brazilian schoolchildren. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 22: 41–6, 1994.

18. Mazzocchi AR, Moretti R. Effectiveness of a dental preventive program on plaque index results in 8-year-old children of Bergamo, Italy. Com-munity Dent Oral Epidemiol, 25: 332–3, 1997.

19. Van-Palenstein-Helderman WH, Munck L, Mushendwa S, van’t-Hof MA, Mrema FG. Effect evaluation of an oral health education program in primary schools in Tanzania. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 25: 296–300, 1997.

20. Maltz M, Barbachan e Silva B, Carvalho DQ, Volkweis A. Results after two years of non-operative treatment of occlusal surface in children with high caries prevalence. Braz Dent J, 14: 48–54, 2003.