Effect of Tooth Preparation on Sealant Success—An in vitro Study

This study compared the depth of penetration and marginal leakage of filled and unfilled sealants, with and without tooth preparation. One hundred and twenty extracted human third molar teeth that were free of restorations, fluorosis, caries, and sealants were used. After adequate storage and surface debridement, the teeth were randomly divided into four groups of 30 teeth each. In two groups, the occlusal surfaces were left intact, while in the other two groups, the occlusal surfaces were prepared using a diamond bur. Teeth in two groups were sealed with a filled sealant, and an unfilled sealant was used to seal teeth in the other two groups. The sealed teeth were then prepared for marginal leakage, immersed in 5% methylene blue (at 37°C)for 24 hours. Subsequently, buccolingual sections were made and each section was examined for sealant penetration and marginal leakage, using a stereomicroscope. The depth of dye penetration and marginal leakage was evaluated according to a method described by Ovrebo and Raadal. The unfilled sealant placed after tooth preparation showed better enamel fissure penetration and less marginal leakage than the filled sealant.

Pit and fissure sealants; marginal leakage; tooth preparation

1. Taylor C.L. and Gwinnett A.J. A study of the penetration of sealants into pits and fissures. J Am Dent Assoc, 87: 1181–1188, 1973.

2. Hicks M.J., Flaitz C.M, Garcio-Godoy F. Fluoride releasing sealants and caries like enamel lesion formation in vitro. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 24: 215–219, 2000.

3. Braham RL, Morris ME. Textbook of Pediatric Dentistry. Second edi-tion. CB Publishers and Distributors; 1990.

4. Perez-Lajarin L, Cortes-Lillo O, Garcia-Ballesta C, Cozar-Hidalgo A. Marginal Microleakage of Two Fissure Sealants: A Comparative Study. J Dent Child, 70: 24–28, 2003.

5. Waggoner WF & Siegal M. Pit and fissures Sealant application: Updat-ing the technique. J Am Dent Assoc, 127: 351–361, 1996.

6. Droz D, Schilee MJ, Panight MM. Penetration and Microleakage of Dental Sealants in Artificial Fissures. J Dent Child, 71: 31–44, 2004.

7. Geiger SB, Gulayev S, Weiss EL. Improving fissure sealant quality; mechanical preparation and filling level. J Dent, 28: 407–412, 2000.

8. Hatibovic-Kofman S, Wright GZ, Braverman I. Microleakage of sealants after conventional, bur, and air-abrasion preparation of pits and fissures. Pediatr Dent, 20: 173–176, 1998.

9. Salama FS, Al-Hammad NS. Marginal seal of sealant and compomer materials with and without enameloplasty. Int J Pediatr Dent, 20, 28–32, 2002.

10. Overbo RC, Raadal M. 1990 “Microleakage in fissures sealed with resin or glass Ionomer cement. Scand J Dent Res, 98: 66–69, 1990.

11. Blackwood JA, Dilley DC, Roberts MW, Jr Swift EJ. Evaluation of pumice, fissure enameloplasty and air abrasion on sealant microleak-age. Pediatr Dent, 24: 199–203, 2002.

12. Garcio-Godoy F, Gwinett AJ. An SEM study of fissure surfaces condi-tioned with scraping technique. Clin Prev Dent, 9: 9–13, 1987.

13. Duangthip D, Lussi D. Effects of Fissure Cleaning Methods, Drying Agents, Fissure Morphology on Microleakage and Penetration Ability of Sealants– in vitro. Pediatr Dent, 25: 527–532, 2003.

14. De Craene GP, Martens C, Dermaut R. The invasive pit-and-fissure sealing technique in pediatric dentistry: an SEM study of preventive restoration. J Dent Child, 55: 34–42, 1988.

15. Garcia-Godoy F, de Araujo FB. Enhancement of fissure sealant pene-tration and adaptation: The Enameloplasty technique. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 19: 13–18, 1994.

16. Feldens EG, Feldens CA, de Araujo FB, Souza MAL. Invasive tech-nique of pit and fissure sealants in primary molars: A SEM study. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 18: 187–190, 1994.

17. Theodoridou-Pahini, Tolidis K, Papadogiannis Y. Degree of microleak-age of some Pit and fissure sealants: an in vitro study. Int J Pediatr Dent, 6: 173–176, 1996.

18. Shapira JE. Six-year clinical evaluation of fissure sealants placed after mechanical Preparation: a matched pair study. Pediatr Dent, 8: 204–205, 1986.

19. Burrow MP, Burrow JF, Makinson OF. Pits and fissures: etch resistance in prismless enamel walls. Aust Dent J, 46; 258–262, 2001.

20. Jr Pope BD, Garcio-Godoy F, Summitt JB, Chan DDCN. Effectiveness of occlusal fissure cleansing methods and sealant micromorphology. J Dent Child, 175–180, 1996.

21. Xalabarde A, Garcio-Godoy F, Boj JR, Canaida C. Fissure micromor-phology and sealant adaptation after occlusal enameloplasty. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 20: 299–304, 1996.

22. Marchushamer M, Neuman E, Garcio-Godoy F. Fluoridated and non-fluoridated unfilled sealants show similar shear strength. Pediatr Dent, 19: 289–290, 1997.

23. Eakle WS, Wong J, Huang H. Microleakage with microabrasion versus acid etched enamel and dentin. J Dent Res, 74: 31, 1995.

24. Brown JR & Barkmeier WW. A comparison of six enamel treatment procedures for sealant bonding. Pediatr Dent, 18: 29–31, 1996.

25. Mathewson RJ and Primosh RE. Fundamentals of Pediatric Dentistry. 3rd Edition. Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc, 1994.

26. Xalabarde A, Garcio-Godoy F, Boj JR, Canaida C. Fissure micromor-phology and sealant adaptation after occlusal enameloplasty. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 20: 299–304, 1996.

27. Fuks AB, Grajower R, Shapira J. In vitro assessment of marginal leak-age of sealants placed in permanent molars with different etching times. J Dent Child, 50: 425–428, 1984.