Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Processed Dairy Beverages pH Evaluation: Consequences of Temperature Variation
1Department of Stomatology, Dentistry School, Federal University of Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
2Department of Restorative Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.33.4.t45825683gv22444 Vol.33,Issue 4,July 2009 pp.319-324
Published: 01 July 2009
*Corresponding Author(s): Fabiana Vargas Ferreira E-mail: fabivfer@yahoo.com.br
Objective: this study assessed the pH from processed dairy beverages as well as eventual consequences deriving from different ingestion temperatures. Study design: 50 adults who accompanied children attended to at the Dentistry School were randomly selected and they answered a questionnaire on beverages. The beverages were divided into 4 groups: yogurt (GI) fermented milk (GII), chocolate-based products (GIII) and fermented dairy beverages (GIV). They were asked which type, flavor and temperature. The most popular beverages were selected, and these made up the sample. A pHmeter Quimis 400 A device was used to verify pH. The average pH from each beverage was calculated and submitted to statistical analysis (Variance and Tukey test with a 5% significance level). Results: for groups I, II and III beverages, type x temperature interaction was significant, showing the pH averages were influenced by temperature variation. At iced temperatures,they presented lower pH values, which were considered statistically significant when compared to the values found for the same beverages at room temperature. Conclusion: all dairy beverages, with the exception of the chocolate-based type presented pH below critical level for enamel and present corrosive potential; as to ingestion temperature, iced temperature influenced pH reducing its values, in vitro.
beverages, dental erosion, deciduous teeth, primary teeth,temperature
Fabiana Vargas Ferreira,Roselaine Terezinha Pozzobon. Processed Dairy Beverages pH Evaluation: Consequences of Temperature Variation. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2009. 33(4);319-324.
1. Ten Cate, JM. What dental diseases are we facing in the new millennium: some aspects of research agenda. Caries Res, 35: 2–5, 2001.
2. Silva, JSA; Baratieri, LN; Araújo, E et al. Erosão dental: uma doença dos tempos atuais. Clínica. Inter J Braz Dent, 3: 150–60, 2007.
3. Künzel, W; Cruz, MS; Fischer, T. Dental erosion in Cuban children associated with excessive consumption of oranges. Eur J Oral Sci, 108: 104–109, 2000.
4. Johansson, AK ; Sorvari, R ; Birkhed D et al. Dental erosion in deciduous teeth – an in vivo and in vitro study. J Dent, 29: 333–340, 2001.
5. Espezim, CS. Avaliação da dureza de esmalte de dente decíduo exposto ao iogurte e leite fermentado: estudo in vitro. [Dissertação]. Florianópolis (SC). Faculdade de Odontologia, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, p. 76, 2003.
6. Lussi, A; Kohler, N; Zero, D et al. A comparison of the erosive potential of different beverages in primary and permanent teeth using an in vitro model Eur J Oral Sci, 108: 110–114, 2000.
7. Al-Majed, I; Maguire, A; Murray, JJ. Risk factors for dental erosion in - 6 years old and 12-14 year old boys in Saudi Arábia. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 30: 38–46, 2002.
8. Luo, Y; Zeng, XJ; Du, MQ et al. The prevalence of dental erosion in preschool children in China. J Dent, 33: 115–121, 2005.
9. Johansson, AK; Sorvari, R; Meurman, JH. In vitro effect of citric acid on deciduous and permanent enamel. Caries Res, 32: 310, 1998.
10. Hunter, ML; West, NX; Hughes, JA et al. Relative susceptibility of deciduous and permanent dental hard tissues to erosion by low pH fruit drink in vitro. J Dent, 28: 2065–270, 2000.
11. Barbour, ME; JS, Rees. The laboratory assessment of enamel erosion: a review. J Dent, 32: 591–602, 2004.
12. West, NX.; Hughes, JA.; Addy, M. Erosion of dentine and enamel in vitro by dietary acids: the effect of temperature, acid character, concentration and exposure time. J Oral Rehabil, 27: 875–880, 2000.
13. Rodas, MAB; Rodrigues, RMMS; Sakuma, H; T et al. Caracterização físico-química, histológica e viabilidade de bactérias lácticas em iogurtes com frutas. Ciênc Tecnol Aliment, 21: 304–09, 2001.
14. Duggal, MS; Toumba, Kj; Pollard, MA et al. The acidogenic potential of herbal baby drinks. Br Dent J, 180: 98–103, 1996.
15. Mahoney, E; Beattie, J; Swain, M et al. Preliminary in vitro assessment of erosive potential using ultra-micro- indentation system. Caries Res, 37: 218–224, 2003.
16. Barbour, ME; Finke, M; Hughes, JA et al. The relationship between enamel softening and erosion caused by soft drinks at a range of temperatures. J Dent, 34: 207–213, 2006.
Cavalcanti, AL; Oliveira, KF de; Paiva, OS et al. Determinação dos sóli-dos solúveis totais (ºBrix) e pH em bebidas lácteas e sucos de frutas industrializados. Pesq Bras Odontoped Clin Integ, 6: 57–64, 2006.
18. Amaechi, BT; Higham, SM: Edgar, WM. Factors influencing the devel-opment of dental erosion in vitro: enamel type, temperature and expo-sure time. J Oral Rehab, 26: 624–630, 1999.
19. Johansson, AK; Lingström, P; Birkhed, D. Influence of drinking method on tooth-surface pH in relation to dental erosion. Eur J Oral Sci, 112: 484–489, 2004.
20. Sánchez, GA; Fernandez de Preliasco, MV. Salivary pH changes during soft drinks consumption in children. Int J Paed Dent, 13: 251–257, 2003.
21. Wiegand, A; Müller, J; Werner, C et al. Prevalence of erosive tooth wear and associated risk factors in 2-7 year-old German kindergarten chil-dren. Oral Diseases, 12: 117–124, 2006.
22. Smith, AJ.; Shaw, L. Baby fruit juices and tooth erosion. Br. Dent. J, 162: 65–67, 1987.
23. Shaw, L.; O’Sullivan, E. Diagnosis and prevention of dental erosion in children. Int. J. Pediat. Dent, 10: 356–365, 2000.
24. Lendnmann, U; Grogan, J; Oppenheim, FG. Saliva and dental pellicle –a review. Adv Dent Res, 14: 22–28, 2000.
Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.
Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.
Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.
JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.
Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.
BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.
Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.
Scopus: CiteScore 1.8 (2023) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.
Top