Clinical Evaluation of Papacarie in Primary Teeth

The change in the concepts of cavity preparation and the development of reliable adhesive materials lead to the development of alternative methods of caries removal. Chemo-mechanical caries removal (CMCR)involves the chemical softening of carious dentin, followed by its removal with gentle excavation. Objective:The present study was conducted to evaluate clinically the efficiency of caries removal using a new chemo-mechanical agent (Papacarie) compared to the conventional drilling method including the need for local anesthesia, the need for drill, duration of the treatment and the pain reaction. Study design: This study was split mouth design. The study was performed on thirty seven bilateral open carious lesions. They were divided into two equal groups according to method of caries removal. In Group I, caries was removed using the Papacarie system and in Group II, caries was removed with the conventional drill. Results: The results showed that the Papacarie was as efficient as the drill in caries removal from open carious lesions with no significant difference in the operating time. The new CMCR agent also reduced significantly the need for local anesthesia and the use of drill. In addition, Papacarie was also more comfortable than the traditional rotatory instruments. Conclusions: It was concluded that Papacarie could be an effective caries removal method to treat children, particularly those who present with early childhood caries or management problems.

Chemo-mechanical caries removal; Papacarie; Dentin caries; Primary teeth; Pain

1. Ten Berge M, Veerkamp JSJ, Hoogstraten J, Prins PJ. Behavioural and emotional problems in chidren referred to special dental care. Commu-nity Dent Oral Epidemiol, 27: 181–6, 1999.

2. Palm AM, Kirkegaard U, Poulsen S. The Wand versus traditional injec-tion for mandibular nerve block in children and adolescents: perceived pain and time of onset. Pediatr Dent, 26: 481–4, 2004.

3. Beeley JA, Yip HK, Stevenson AG. Chemo-chemical caries removal: a review of the techniques and latest developments. Br Dent J, 188: 427–30, 2000.

4. Maragakis GM, Hahn P, Hellwig E. Clinical evaluation of chemo-mechanical caries removal in primary molars and its acceptance by patients. Caries Res, 35: 205–10, 2001.

5. Bussadori SK, Castro LC, Galvão A. Papain Gel:A new chemo mechanical caries removal agent. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 30: 115–9, 2005.

6. Culquicόndor EA. Tratamiento ultraconservador y minimamente inva-sivo de la caries dental 2006. Available at: http://www. ecuaodontolo-gos.com/revistaaorybg/vol4num3/tratamiento.htm l. Accessed on Dec 2007.

7. Oloyede OI. Chemical profile of unripe pulp of Carica Papaya. Pak-istan J Nutrition, 4: 379–81, 2005.

8. Starley IF, Mohammed P, Schneider G, Bickler SW. The treatment of pediatric burns using topical papaya. Burns, 25: 636–9, 1999.

9. Candido LC. Nova abordagem no tratamento de feridas. São Paulo: Senac-SP, 2001. Available at: http://www.feridologo.com.br/curpapaina. htm. Accessed on Feb 2007.

10. Mandelbaum SH, Santis EP, Mandelbaum MHS. Cicatrization: current concepts and auxiliary resources – Part II. An Bras Dermatol, 78: 525–42, 2003.

11. Nyøygard L, Borgeraas N, Herlofson BB. Oral mucosal effects of tooth pastes containing papain and vitamin B5. Hand-out presented at the 5th Biennial Congress European Association of Oral Medecine, Gøteborg, Sweden, 24th-26th August 2000.

12. Dental products spotlight. Whitening Toothpastes. J Am Dent Assoc, 132: 1146–7, 2001.

13. Silva LR, Motta LJ, Reda SH, Façanha RAA, Bussadori SK. Papacárie®–a new system for de chemo-mechanical caries removal-case report. Rev Paul Odontol XXVI: 4–8, 2004.

14. Silva LR, Murillo JH, Santos EM, Guedes-Pinto AC, Bussadori SK. Utilizaciόn del gel de la papaya para la remociόn de la caries –reporte de un caso con seguimiento clínico de un año. Acta Odontol Venez, 43: 155–8, 2005.

15. Ericson D, Zimmerman M, Raber H, Götrick B, Bornstein R, Thorell J. Clinical evaluation of efficacy and safety of a new method for chemo-mechanical removal of caries: A multi-centre study. Caries Res, 33: 171–7, 1999.

16. Nadanovsky P, Carneiro CF, De Mello SF. Removal of caries using only hand instruments: A comparison of mechanical and chemo-mechanical methods. Caries Res, 35: 384–9, 2001.

17. Wright GZ, Weinberger SJ, Marti R, Plotzke O. The effectiveness of infiltration anesthesia in the mandibular primary molar region. Pediatr Dent, 6: 238–42, 1991.

18. Kidd EAM, Jojstonbechal S, Beighton D. The use of a caries detector dye during cavity preparation- a microbiological assessment. Brit Dent J, 174: 245–8, 1993.

19. Yip HK, Stevenson AG, Beeley JA. The specificity of caries detector dyes in cavity preparation. Br Dent J, 176: 417–21, 1994.

20. Hosoya Y, Taguchi T, Tay FR. Evaluation of a new caries detecting dye for primary and permanent carious dentin. J Dent, 35: 137–49, 2007.

21. Bussadori SK, Guedes CC, Martins MD, Fernandes KPS, Dos Santos EM. Gel a base de papaína: una nueva alternative para la remociόn química y mecánica de la caries. Actas Odontolόgicas, 3: 35–9, 2006.

22. Ohgushi K, Fusayama T. Electron microscopic structure of the two lay-ers of carious dentin. J Dent Res, 54: 1019–26, 1975.

23. Yamada T, Nakamura K, Iwaku M, Fusayama T. The extent of the odontoblastic process in normal and carious dentin. J Dent Res, 62: 798–802, 1983.

24. Rafique S, Fiske J, Banerjee A. Clinical trial of an air abrasion/chemo-mechanical operative procedure for the restorative treatment of dental patients. Caries Res, 37: 360–4, 2003.

25. Allen KL, Salgado TL, Janal MN, Thompson VP. Removing carious dentin using a polymer instrument without anesthesia versus a carbide bur with anesthesia. J Am Dent Assoc, 136: 643–51, 2005.

26. Getz T, Weinstein P. The effect of structural variables on child behav-ior in the operatory. Pediatr Dent, 3: 262–6, 1981.

27. Wilson S, Dilley DC, Vann WF. Pain perception control. In: Pinkham JR, Casamassimo PS, McTigue DJ, Fields HW, Nowak AJ. Pediatric dentistry; Infancy through adolescence. Ed. El Sevier Saunders, Mis-souri; 108–15, 2005.

28. Bedi R, Sutcliffe P, Donnan PT, McConnachie J. The prevalence of dental anxiety in a group of 13- and 14-year-old Scottish children. Int J Pediatr Dent, 2: 17–24, 1992.

29. Locker D, Shapiro D, Liddell A. Negative dental experiences and the relationship to dental anxiety. Community Dent Health, 13: 86–92, 1996.