Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Article Menu
Export Article
More by Authors Links
Article Data
- Views 1047
- Dowloads 154
Original Research
Open AccessDental Treatment under General Anesthesia in Healthy and Medically Compromised/Developmentally Disabled Children: A Comparative Study
Dental Treatment under General Anesthesia in Healthy and Medically Compromised/Developmentally Disabled Children: A Comparative Study
- Juan Pablo Loyola-Rodriguez1,*,
- Veronica Zavala-Alonso1
- Cinthya L Gonzalez-Alvarez1
- Lilia A Juarez-Lopez2
- Nuria Patiño-Marin1
- Cesar D Gonzalez3
1The Master’s Degree in Dental Science with specialization in Advanced General Dentistry Program at San Luis Potosi University, Mexico
2Department of Pediatric Dentistry, National University of Mexico, Campus Iztacala, Mexico
3Pediatric Dentistry, Marquette University School of Dentistry, USA
DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.34.2.u665328k4g467pg2 Vol.34,Issue 2,March 2010 pp.177-182
Published: 01 March 2010
*Corresponding Author(s): Juan Pablo Loyola-Rodriguez E-mail: jloyola@uaslp.mx
Abstract
Aim: To compare the type, number of procedures and working time of dental treatment provided under dental general anesthesia (DGA) in healthy and medically compromised/developmentally disabled children(MCDD children). Design: This cross-sectional prospective study involved 80 children divided into two groups of 40 children each. Group 1 consisted of healthy and Group 2 consisted of MCDD children. Results:Healthy children needed more working time than MCDD children, the means being 161±7.9 and 84±5.7 minutes, respectively (P= 0.0001). Operative dentistry and endodontic treatments showed a significant statistical difference (P= 0.0001). The means of procedures were 17±5.0 for healthy children and 11±4.8 for MCDD children (P= 0.0001). Conclusions: Healthy children needed more extensive dental treatment than MCDD children under DGA. The information from this sample of Mexican children could be used as reference for determining trends both within a facility as well as in comparing facilities in cross-population studies.
Keywords
dental treatment, general anesthesia, outpatient anesthesia, oral rehabilitation
Cite and Share
Juan Pablo Loyola-Rodriguez,Veronica Zavala-Alonso,Cinthya L Gonzalez-Alvarez,Lilia A Juarez-Lopez,Nuria Patiño-Marin,Cesar D Gonzalez. Dental Treatment under General Anesthesia in Healthy and Medically Compromised/Developmentally Disabled Children: A Comparative Study. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2010. 34(2);177-182.
References
1. Loyola-Rodríguez JP, Aguilera-Morelos AA, Torres-Juárez A, Santos- Díaz MA, González-Azúara K. Dental treatment under general anesthesia of children with special needs. Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex, 59: 288–296, 2002.
2. Ghezzi EM, Chávez E, Ship JA. General anesthesia protocol for the dental patient: emphasis for older adults. Spec Care Dentist, 20: 81–108, 2000.
3. Waldman HB & Perlman SP. Dental Care for individuals with developmental disabilities is expensive, but needed. J Calif Dent Assoc, 30: 427–432, 2002.
4. Jameson K,Averley PA, Shackley P, Steele J.Acomparison of the ‘cost per child treated’ at a primary care-based sedation referral service, compared to a general anaesthetic in hospital. Br Dent J, 203: E13, 2007.
5. Maestre C. The use of general anaesthesia for tooth extraction in young handicapped adults in France. Br Dent J, 180: 297–302, 1996.
6. Manley MCG, Skelly AM, Hamilton AG. Dental treatment for people with challenging behaviour: general anaesthesia or sedation? Br Dent J, 188: 358–360, 2000.
7. Coyle TT, Helfrick JF, GonzalezML,Andresen RV, Perrott DH. Officebased ambulatory anesthesia: Factors that influence patient’s satisfaction or dissatisfaction with deep sedation/general anesthesia. J Oral Maxill of Surg, 63: 163–172, 2005.
8. Shyama M, Al-Mutawa SA, Morris RE, Sugathan T, Honkala E. Dental caries experience of disabled children and young adults in Kuwait. Community Dent Health, 18: 181–186, 2001.
9. Mitsea AG, Karidis AG, Donta-Bakoyianni C, Spyropoulos ND. Oral health status in Greek children and teenagers with disabilities. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 26: 111–118, 2001.
10. Hulland S, Sigal MJ. Hospital-based dental care for persons with disabilities: a study of patient selection criteria. Spec Care Dentist, 20: 131–138, 2000.
11. Frankl SN, Shiere FR, Fogels HR. Should the parent remain in the operatory? J Dent Child, 29: 150–163, 1962.
12 Keats AS. The ASA classification of physical status: a recapitulation. Anesthesiology, 49: 233–236, 1978.
13. AmericanAcademy of Pediatric Dentistry: Guideline on behavior guidance for the pediatric dental patient. Pediatr Dent, 27: 92–100, 2005–2006.
14. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry: Guideline on use of anesthesia care providers in the administration of in-office deep sedation/ general anesthesia to the pediatric dental patient. Pediatr Dent, 27: 119–121, 2005–2006.
15. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry: Clinical guideline on use of anesthesia-trained personnel in the provision of general anesthe-sia/deep sedation to the pediatric dental patient. Pediatr Dent, 26: 104–105, 2004.
16. Loyola-Rodriguez JP, Aguilera-Morelos AA, Santos-Diaz MA, Zavala-Alonso V, Davila-Perez C, Olvera-Delgado H, Patiño-Marin N, De Leon-Cobian I. Oral rehabilitation under general anesthesia, conscious sedation, and conventional techniques in patients affected by cerebral palsy. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 28: 279–284, 2004.
17. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry: Clinical guideline on pedi-atric restorative dentistry. Pediatr Dent, 26: 106–114, 2004.
18. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry: Guideline on pulp therapy for primary and young permanent teeth. Pediatr Dent, 27: 130–134, 2005–2006.
19. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry: Guideline on pediatric oral surgery. Pediatr Dent, 27: 158–164, 2005-2006.
20. Aldrete JA, Kroulik D. Postanesthetic recovery score. Anesth Analg, 49: 924–934, 1970.
21. Loyola-Rodriguez JP, Zavala-Alonso NV, Patiño-Marin N, Friedman C. A new classification system for dental treatment under general anes-thesia. Spec Care Dentist, 26: 25–29, 2006.
22. Haubek D, Fugisang M, Poulsen S, Rolling I. Dental treatment of chil-dren referred to general anaesthesia-association with country of origin and medical status. Int J Paediatric Dent, 16: 239–46, 2006.
23. Vermeulen M, Vinckier F, Vandenbroucke J. Dental general anesthesia: Clinical characteristics of 933 patients. J Dent Child, 58: 27–30, 1991.
24. Jamjoom MM, al-Malik MI, Holt RD, el-Nassry A. Dental treatment under general anaesthesia at a hospital in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Int J Paediatric Dent, 11: 110–116, 2001.
25. Messieha Z. Risks of general anesthesia for the special needs dental patient. Spec Care Dentist, 29: 21–25, 2009.
26. Atan S, Ashley P, Gilthorpe MS, Scheer B, Mason C, Roberts G. Mor-bidity following dental treatment of children under intubation general anaesthesia in a day-stay unit. Int J Paediatric Dent, 14: 9–16, 2004.
27. Vinckier F, Gizani S, Declerck D. Comprehensive dental care for chil-dren with rampant caries under general anaesthesia. Int J Paediatric Dent, 11: 25–32, 2001.
28. Ibricevic H., Al-Jame Q., Honkala S. Pediatric dental procedures under general anesthesia at the Amiri hospital in Kuwait. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 25: 337–342, 2001.
29. Rodríguez-Vázquez C, Garcillan MR, Rioboo R, Bratos E. Prevalence of dental caries in an adult population with mental disabilities in Spain. Spec Care Dentist, 22: 65–69, 2002.
30. Camilleri A, Roberts G, Ashley P, Scheer B. Analysis of paediatric den-tal care provided under general anaesthesia and levels of dental disease in two hospitals. Br Dent J, 196: 219–223, 2004.
31. Kataria B, Epstein R, Bailey A, et al. A comparison of sevoflurane to halothane in paediatric surgical patients: results of a multicentre inter-national study. Paediatr Anaesth, 6: 283–292, 1996.
32. Maurer SM, Boggs AM, Mourino AP, Farrington FH. Recall intervals: effect on treatment needs of the handicapped patient: a retrospective study. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 20: 123–6, 1996.
33. Perrott DH, Yuen JP, Andresen RV, Dodson TB. Office-based ambula-tory anesthesia: outcomes of clinical practice of oral and maxillofacial surgeons. J Oral Maxillof Surg, 61: 983–995, 2003.
Abstracted / indexed in
Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.
Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.
Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.
JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.
Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.
BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.
Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.
Scopus: CiteScore 1.8 (2023) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.
Submission Turnaround Time
Conferences
Top