Midazolam-Fentanyl Analgo-Sedation in Pediatric Dental Patients – A Pilot Study

he objective of this study was to comparatively evaluate the effectiveness of submucosal fentanyl when administered in conjunction with oral midazolam during pediatric procedural sedations. Study design: Twenty three uncooperative ASA type I children who met the selection criteria were randomly assigned to receive either submucosal fentanyl (3µg/kg) or placebo, along with oral midazolam (0.5mg/kg). A triple blind, 2-stage cross-over design was adopted so that each child received both the regimens. Results: Transient oxygen desaturation was observed in 4 children who were sedated with the combination of oral midazolam and submucosal fentanyl. The overall success was 73.91% with oral midazolam and submucosal fentanyl regimen and 47.83% for oral midazolam and submucosal placebo regimen. The chances of ‘satisfactorily’completing a 45 minute dental procedure in an uncooperative pediatric patient was 2.8 times more, when submucosal fentanyl was used along with oral midazolam. Conclusion: Submucosal fentanyl appears to improve the short working time associated with oral midazolam. But the oxygen desaturation associated with this regimen necessitates further studies to evaluate the efficacy of this combination at relatively lower doses before being used routinely for pediatric procedural sedation and analgesia.

1. Nathan JE, Vargas KG. Oral midazolam with and without meperidine for management of the difficult young pediatric dental patient: a retrospective study. Pediatr Dent, 24: 129–38, 2002.

2. Silver T, Wilson C, Webb M. Evaluation of two dosages of oral midazolam as a conscious sedation for physically and neurologically compromised pediatric dental patients. Pediatr Dent, 16: 350–9, 1994.

3. Matharu L, Ashley PF. Sedation of anxious children undergoing dental treatment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1):CD003877, 2006.

4. Flood RG, Krauss B. Procedural sedation and analgesia for children in the emergency department. Emerg Med Clin North Am, 21: 121–39, 2003.

5. Smith HS. Opioid metabolism. Mayo Clin Proc, 84: 613-24, 2009.

6. Cathers JW, Wilson CF, Webb MD, Alvarez ME, Schiffman T, Taylor S. A comparison of two meperidine/hydroxyzine sedation regimens for the uncooperative pediatric dental patient. Pediatr Dent, 27: 395–400, 2005.

7. Kaplan RF, Yang CI. Sedation and analgesia in pediatric patients for procedures outside the operating room. Anesthesiol Clin North America, 20: 181–94, 2002.

8. Farrar MW, Lerman J. Novel concepts for analgesia in pediatric surgical patients. Cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors, alpha 2-agonists and opioids. Anesthesiol Clin North America, 20: 59–82, 2002.

9. Kennedy RM, Porter FL, Miller JP, Jaffe DM. Comparison of fentanyl/midazolam with ketamine/midazolam for pediatric orthopedic emergencies. Pediatrics, 102: 956–63, 1998.

10. Lucas da Silva PS, Oliveira Iglesias SB, Leão FV, Aguiar VE, Brunow de Carvalho W. Procedural sedation for insertion of central venous catheters in children: comparison of midazolam/fentanyl with midazolam/ketamine. Paediatr Anaesth, 17: 358–63, 2007.

11. Ashburn MA, Streisand JB, Tarver SD et al. Oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate for premedication in paediatric outpatients. Can J Anaesth, 37: 857–66, 1990.

12. Moore PA, Cuddy MA, Magera JA, Caputo AC, Chen AH, Wilkinson LA. Oral transmucosal fentanyl pretreatment for outpatient general anesthesia. Anesth Prog, 47: 29–34, 2000.

13. Klein EJ, Diekema DS, Paris CA, Quan L, Cohen M, Seidel KD. A randomized, clinical trial of oral midazolam plus placebo versus oral midazolam plus oral transmucosal fentanyl for sedation during laceration repair. Pediatrics, 109: 894–7, 2002.

14. Schmitt M, Nazif MM, McKee KC et al. Pharmacokinetics and local responses to submucosal meperidine compared with other routes of administration. Pediatr Dent, 16: 190–2, 1994.

15. Padmanabhan MY, Pandey RK, Saksena AK, Chandra G. A comparative evaluation of agents producing analgo-sedation in pediatric dental patients. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 34: 183–8, 2010.

16. American Academy of Pediatrics; American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Guideline for monitoring and management of pediatric patients during and after sedation for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Pediatr Dent, 30(7 Suppl):143–59, 2008–2009.

17. Citerio G, Franzosi MG, Latini R et al. Anaesthesiological strategies in elective craniotomy: randomized, equivalence, open trial—the NeuroMorfeo trial. Trials 10: 19, 2009.

18. Flacke JW, Flacke WE, Bloor BC, Van Etten AP, Kripke BJ. Histamine release by four narcotics: a double-blind study in humans. Anesth Analg, 66 :723–30, 1987.

19. Cherng CH, Wong CS, Ho ST. Epidural fentanyl speeds the onset of sensory block during epidural lidocaine anesthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 26: 523–6, 2001.

20. Movafegh A, Nouralishahi B, Sadeghi M, Nabavian O. An ultra-low dose of naloxone added to lidocaine or lidocaine-fentanyl mixture prolongs axillary brachial plexus blockade. Anesth Analg, 109: 1679–83, 2009.

21. Aubuchon RW. Sedation liabilities in pedodontics. Pediatr Dent, 4: 171–80, 1982.