Comparative Evaluation of Bactericidal Potential of Four Root Canal Filling Materials against Microflora of Infected Non -Vital Primary Teeth

Since complete debridement of the root canals of the primary teeth is not practically possible due to the highly variable root canal anatomy, success of the endodontic therapy depends partly on the use of antibacterial irrigating agents and root canal filling materials. Recent literature indicates that anaerobes comprise a majority of the bacteria in necrotic root canals of primary teeth. The study determined the antibacterial effectiveness of four root canal filling materials namely Calcium hydroxide, Zinc oxide eugenol, Vitapex and Metapex against microbial specimens obtained directly from necrotic root canals of primary teeth. Method: Microbial specimens were collected using sterile paper points, from 15 primary maxillary and mandibular posterior teeth of randomly selected children in the age group of 4-10 years with infected non vital primary teeth, requiring pulpectomy procedure. The microbial specimens collected were subjected to microbiological analysis and the antimicrobial potential of root canal filling materials were tested using Agar diffusion technique. Results: were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA. Facultative/Aerobic organisms were isolated in all the cases, anaerobic organisms were isolated in 80% of the cases, and Candida albicans was isolated in 1 case. ZOE showed superior inhibitory activity against most of the organisms isolated followed by Vitapex, Calcium hydroxide and Metapex in descending order. Conclusion: Our data may be useful as a guide for relative antimicrobial effectiveness or non-effectiveness of the materials employed. In vivo studies are required to state the specific antimicrobial activity and merits and demerits of any of the test filling material.

Zinc oxide eugenol, Vitapex, Calcium hydroxide, Metapex, micro-organisms, root canal, primary teeth.

1. Tronstad L. Recent development in endodontic research. Scand J Dent Res, 100: 52–9. 1992.

2. Tchaou WS, Turng BF, Minah GE, Coll JA. Inhibition of pure cultures of oral bacteria by root canal filling materials. Pediatr Dent, 18(7): 444–49, 1996.

3. Cox ST, Hembree JH, Mcknight JP et al. The bactericidal potential of various endodontic materials for primary teeth. Oral Surg, 45(6): 947–54, 1978.

4. Tchaou WS, Turng BF, Minah GE, Coll JA. In vitro inhibition of bacteria from root canals of primary teeth by various dental materials. Pediatr Dent, 17(5): 351–55, 1995.

5. Reddy S, Ramakrishna Y. Evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of various root canal filling materials used in primary teeth: A microbiological study. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 31(3): 195–99, 2007.

6. Akdeniz BG, Koparal E, Sen BH, Ates M, Denizci AA. Prevalence of candida albicans in oral cavities and root canals of children. J Dent Child, 289–92, 2002.

7. Pazelli LC, Freitas AC, Ito IY, Souza-Gugelmin MC, Medeiros AS, Nelson- Filho P. Prevalence of microorganisms in root canals of human deciduous teeth with necrotic pulp and chronic periapical lesions. Pesqui Odontol Bras, 17(4): 367–71, 2003.

8. Bauer A, W, Kirby W, Sherris JC and Turch M. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by standardized single disc method. Amer J Clin Pathol, 45: 493, 1966.

9. Cowan and Steel. Manual for identification of Medical bacteria. 3rd edition. Cambridge university press. 112–14.

10. Y.Vette S, McCater. Oral and Maxillofacial infection. Topazian, 4th edition; chapter 3: 43–61.

11. Topley and Wilson. Microbiology and microbial infections. 9th edition: vol 3, 225–27.

12. Mendel and Bennet. Principle and practice of infectious disease. 5th edition, 286–89.

13. Marsh SJ, Largent MD. A bacteriological study of the pulp canals of infected primary molars. J Dent Child, 34: 460–470, 1967.

14. Cohen MM, Joress SM, Calisti LP. Bacteriologic study of infected deciduous molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 13(11): 1382–86, 1960.

15. Tomic-Karovic K, Jelinek E. Comparative study of the bacteriological flora in the surroundings, the root canals and sockets of deciduous molars. Int Dent J, 21: 375–88, 1971.

16. Toyoshimo Y, Fukusima H, Inoue JI, Sasaki Y, Yamamoto. Bacteriological study of the periapical pathosis on deciduous teeth. JPN Dent J, 26: 449–58, 1988.

17. Silva LAB, Nelson-Filho P, Faria G et al. Bacterial profile in primary teeth with necrotic pulp and periapical lesions. Braz Dent J, 17(2): 144–48, 2006.

18. Rocas IN, Siqueira JF, Santos KRN.Association of Enterococcus faecalis with different forms of periradicular diseases. J Endodon, 30(5): 315–20, 2004.

19. Peters LB, Wesselink PR, van Winkelhoff AJ. Combinations of bacterial species in endodontic infections. Int Endod J, 35(8): 698–702, 2002.

20. Sundqvist G, Johansson E, Sjogren U. Prevalence of Black-pigmented Bacteroides species in root canal infections. J Endodon, 15(1): 13–19, 1989.

21. Chu FCS, Tsang CSP, Chow TW, Samaranayake LP. Identification of cultivable microorganisms from primary endodontic infections with exposed and unexposed pulp space. J Endodon, 31(6): 424–29, 2005.

22. Adib V, Spratt D, Ng YL, Gulabivala K. Cultivable microbial flora associated with persistent periapical disease and coronal leakage after root canal treatment: a preliminary study. Int Endod J, 37(8): 542–51, 2004.

23. Gomes BP, Pinheiro ET, Gade-Neto CR et al. Microbiological examination of infected dental root canals. Oral Microbiol Immunol, 19(2): 71–6, 2004.

24. Hobson P. Pulp treatment of deciduous teeth. Br Dent J, 128: 232–8, 275–82, 1970.

25. Broisman H, Van Houte J, Gron P and Krakow A.A. Antimicrobial effects of N2 in vitro. Oral Surg, Oral Med, Oral Pathol, 45: 116–122, 1978.

26. Grossman L.I. Antimicrobial effect of root canal cements. J of Endod, 6: 594–507, 1980.

27. Pupo J, Biral R.R, Benatti O, Abe A and Valrighi L. Antimicrobial effects of endodontic filling materials on microorganisms found in root canal. Oral Surg, 74: 216–220, 1992.

28. Rahmat AB. Evaluation of antimicrobial activity of 10 root canal filling materials on Streptococcus sanguis and Streptococcus mutans. Oral Surg, Oral Med, Oral Pathol, 68: 99–102, 1989.

29. Canalda C, Pumarola J. Bacterial growth inhibition produced by root canal sealer cements with calcium hydroxide base. Oral Surg, Oral Med, Oral Pathol, 68: 99–102, 1989.

30. Pumarola J, Esteban B and Canalda C. Antimicrobial activity of 7 root canal sealers. Oral Surg, Oral Med, Oral Pathol, 74: 216–220, 1992.

31. DiFiore PM, Peters DD, Setterstrom JA, Lortan L. The antibacterial effects of calcium hydroxide apexification pastes on Streptococcus sanguis. Oral Sur,g 55(1): 91–94, 1983.

32. Abdulkader A, Duguid R and Saunders E.M. The antimicrobial activity of endodontic sealers to anaerobic bacteria. Int Endod J, 29: 280–283, 1996.

33. Siqueria J.F and Gonclaves R.B. Antibacterial activities of root canal against selected anaerobic bacteria. J Endod, 22: 890, 1996.

34. Pabla T, Gulati MS, Mohan U. Evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of various root canal filling materials for primary teeth. J Ind Soc Pedod Prev Dent, 15(4): 134–40, 1997.

35. Nurko C, Garcia-Godoy F. Evaluation of a calcium hydroxide / iodoform paste (vitapex) in root canal therapy for primary teeth. J Clin Ped Dent, 23: 289–94, 1999.

36. Estrela C, Estrela CRA, Hollanda ACB, Decurcio DA, Pecora JD. Influence iodoform on antimicrobial potential of calcium hydroxide. J Appl Oral Sci, 14: 33–37, 2006.