Article Data

  • Views 965
  • Dowloads 130

Original Research

Open Access

Bond Strength of Two-Step Etch-and-Rinse Adhesive Systems to the Dentin of Primary and Permanent Teet

  • Hérica Adad Ricc1
  • Mariane Emi Sanab1
  • Carlos Alberto de Souza Cost1
  • Josimeri Heblin1,*,

1Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Araraquara School of Dentistry, UNESP – Univ. Estadual Paulista, Araraquara, SP, Brasil.

DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.35.2.958893530534m503 Vol.35,Issue 2,March 2011 pp.163-168

Published: 01 March 2011

*Corresponding Author(s): Josimeri Heblin E-mail: jhebling@foar.u

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the immediate microtensile bond strength (TBS) of two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive systems to the dentin of primary and permanent teeth. Study Design: Noncarious human teeth (12 primary molars and 12 premolars) were assigned to 3 groups according to the adhesive system. The adhesive systems were applied to flat superficial coronal dentin surfaces etched with phosphoric acid and composite resin blocks were built up. The teeth were sectioned to produce beam-shaped specimens with 0.81 mm² cross sectional area subjected to TBS testing. TBS data were analyzed statistically by ANOVA and Tukey’s test (a= 0.05). Results: The adhesive systems produced statistically similar mean TBS to each other (p>0.05) and no significant differences (p>0.05) were found when the same material was applied to primary or permanent tooth dentin. The mean TBS values (MPa) obtained were: Prime & Bond NT: 41.7±14.4 (permanent) and 40.8±13.4 (primary); Single Bond: 42.9±8.6 (permanent) and 41.4±11.9 (primary); Excite DSC: 46.3±11.3 (permanent teeth) and 43.4±12.0 (primary). Conclusion: There was no difference in the immediate TBS of two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive systems when applied to the dentin of primary and permanent

Keywords

words: Dentin-Bonding Agents; Dentin; Tensile Strength; Tooth, Deciduous; Dentition, Permannet.

Cite and Share

Hérica Adad Ricc,Mariane Emi Sanab,Carlos Alberto de Souza Cost,Josimeri Heblin. Bond Strength of Two-Step Etch-and-Rinse Adhesive Systems to the Dentin of Primary and Permanent Teet. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2011. 35(2);163-168.

References

1. De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Suzuki K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Four-year water degradation of total-etch adhesives bonded to dentin. J Dent Res, 82: 136–140, 2003.

2. Reis AF, Giannini M, Pereira PN. Effects of a peripheral enamel bond on the long-term effectiveness of dentin bonding agents exposed to water in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 85: 10–17, 2008.

3. Marshall GW Jr, Marshall SJ, Kinney JH, Balooch M. The dentin substrate: structure and properties related to bonding. J Dent, 25: 441–458, 1997.

4. Nakajima M, Sano H, Urabe I, Tagami J, Pashley DH. Bond strengths of single-bottle dentin adhesives to caries-affected dentin. Oper Dent, 25: 2–10, 2000.

5. Sumikawa DA, Marshall GW, Gee L, Marshall SJ. Microstructure of primary tooth dentin. Pediatr Dent, 21: 439–444, 1999.

6. Hirayama A, Yamada M, Miake K. An electron microscope study on dentinal tubules of human deciduous teeth. Shikwa Gakuho 86: 1021–31, 1992. Apud Sumikawa DA et al. Microstructure of primary tooth dentin. Pediatr Dent, 21: 439–444, 1999.

7. Angker L, Nockolds C, Swain M, Kilpatrick N. Quantitative analysis of mineral content of sound and carious primary dentine using BSE imaging. Arch Oral Biol, 49: 99–107, 2004.

8. Nör JE, Feigal RJ, Dennison JB, Edwards CA. Dentin bonding: SEM comparison of the resin-dentin interface in primary and permanent teeth. J Dent Res, 75: 1396–1403, 1996.

9. Bordin-Aykroyd S, Sefton J, Davies EH. In vitro bond strengths of three current dentin adhesives to primary and permanent teeth. Dent Mater, 8: 74–78, 1992.

10. Senawongse P, Harnirattisai C, Shimada Y, Tagami J. Effective bond strength of current adhesive systems on deciduous and permanent dentin. Oper Dent, 29: 196–202, 2004.

11. Uekusa S, Yamaguchi K, Miyazaki M, Tsubota K, Kurokawa H, Hosoya Y. Bonding efficacy of single-step self-etch systems to sound primary and permanent tooth dentin. Oper Dent, 31: 569–576, 2006.

12. Mazzeo N, Ott NW, Hondrum SO. Resin bonding to primary teeth using three adhesive systems. Pediatr Dent 17: 112-115, 1997.

13. El-Kalla IH, Garcia-Godoy F. Bond strength and interfacial micromorphology of four adhesive systems in primary and permanent molars. J Dent Child, 8: 169–176, 1998.

14. Burrow MF, Nopnakeepong U, Phrukkanon S. A comparison of microtensile bond strengths of several dentin bonding systems to primary and permanent dentin. Dent Mater, 18: 239–245, 2002.

15. Cecilia, CG, Ballesta CG, Lillo OC, Lajarín LP. Shear Bond strength of a self-etching adhesive in primary and permanent dentition. Am J Dent, 18: 331–334, 2005.

16. Soares FZ, Rocha Rde O, Raggio DP, Sadek FT, Cardoso PE. Microtensile Bond strength of different adhesive systems to primary and permanent dentin. Pediatr Dent, 27: 457-462, 2005.

17. Hosoya Y, Nishigushi M, Kashiwabara Y, Horiuchi A, Goto G. Comparison of two dentin adhesives to primary and permanent bovine teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 22: 69–76, 1997.

18. Oliveira SS, Pugach MK, Hilton JF, Watanabe LG, Marshall SJ, Marshall GW Jr. The influence of the dentin smear layer on adhesion: A self-etching primer vs. total-etch system. Dent Mater, 19: 758–767, 2003.

19. Sardella TN, de Castro FL, Sanabe ME, Hebling J. Shortening of primary dentin etching time and its implication on bond strength. J Dent, 33: 355–362, 2005.

20. Wilder AD Jr, Swift EJ Jr, May KN Jr Waddell SL. Bond strengths of conventional and simplified bonding systems. Am J Dent, 11: 114–117, 1998.

21. Nör JE, Feigal RJ, Dennison JB, Edwards CA Dentin bonding: SEM comparison of the dentin surface in primary and permanent teeth. Pediatr Dent, 19: 246–252, 1997.

22. Porter AE, Nalla RK, Minor A, Jinschek JR, Kisielowski C, Radmilovic V, Kinney JH, Tomsia AP, Ritchie RO.A transmission electron microscopy study of mineralization in age-induced transparent dentin. Biomaterials, 26: 7650–7660, 2005.

23. Verdelis K, Lukashova L, Wright JT, Mendelsohn R, Peterson MG, Doty S, Boskey AL. Maturational changes in dentin mineral properties. Bone, 40: 1399–1407, 2007.

24. Giannini M, Carvalho RM, Martins LR, Dias CT, Pashley DH. The influence of tubule density and area of solid dentin on bond strength of two adhesive systems to dentin. J Adhes Dent, 3: 315–324, 2001.

25. Hebling J, de Castro FLA, Costa CAS. Adhesive performance of dentin bonding agents applied in vivo and in vitro. Effect of intrapulpar pressure and dentin depth. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 83: 295–303, 2007.

26. Koutsi V, Noonan RG, Horner JA, Simpson MD, Matthews WG, Pashley DH. The effect of dentin depth on the permeability and ultrastructure of primary molars. Pediatr Dent, 16: 29–35, 1994.

27. Sanabe ME, Kantovitz KR, Costa CAS, Hebling J. Effect of acid etching time on the degradation of resin-dentin bonds produced in primary teeth. Am J Den,t 22: 37–42, 2009.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 1.8 (2023) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top