Microleakage and SEM Analysis of Flowable Resin Used as a Sealant Following Three Fissure Preparation Techniques – An in vitro Study

Preventive procedures using pit and fissure sealants are one of the important aspects of pediatric dental practice. The objectives of this in vitro study were to comparatively evaluate microleakage and resin tag penetration of a flowable resin used as a sealant on molars after preparation with Conventional, Enameloplasty and Fissurotomy techniques. Method: A total of 48 teeth were divided into 3 groups (n-16). Group A(CST),Group B (EST),and Group C (FT). Following the fissure preparation sealant was applied as per manufacturer’s instructions. 8 samples in each group were used for Microleakage and Resin tag analysis. Microleakage analysis was done under Stereomicroscope after Methylene blue dye immersion by using scoring system. The resin tag analysis was done by measuring the length of resin tags on scanning electron microscope (SEM) images consisting of 10µm scale taken under optical zoom of 2000 X. Results: Significantly lesser microleakage score (P<0.01) and longer resin tag penetration (P<0.001) observed in EST (mean score 0.5±0.53) & (12.19±1.93µm) when compared to CST(mean score 1.75±0.89) & (5.96±1.84µm) and FT (mean score 1.5±0.53) & (6.76±1.82µm) which showed more microleakage and short resin tags. No statistical significance between CST and FT was found. Conclusion: EST has proven to be an excellent method for preparation of pits and fissures when Flowable composite is used as a sealant because of its lesser microleakage and longer resin tag penetration.

Conventional Sealant technique (CST), Enameloplasty Sealant technique (EST), Fissurotomy technique (FT), Microleakage, Resin tag penetration.

1. Freedman G, Goldstep F, Seif T, Pakroo J. Ultraconservative Resin restorations. J Can Dent Assoc, 65: 579–81, 1999.

2. Salama F S, Al-Hammad N S. Marginal seal of sealant and compomer materials with or without enameloplasty. Int J Pediatr Dent, 12: 39–46, 2002.

3. Ripa LW, Leske GS, Varma AO. Longitudinal study of the caries susceptibility of occlusal and proximal surfaces of first permanent molars. Public Health Dentistry, 48: 8–13, 1988.

4. Frazier P J. Use of sealents: societal and professional factors. Journal of Dental Education, 48: 80–95, 1984.

5. British Society of Paediatric Dentistry. A policy document on management of caries in the primary dentition. Int J Paed. Dent, 11: 153–7, 2001.

6. Blackwood J A, Dilley D C, Roberts M W, Swift E G Jr. Evaluation of pumice, fissure enameloplasty and air abrasion on sealant microleakage. Pediatr Dent, 24: 199–203, 2002.

7. Autio –Gold J T. Clinical evaluation of a medium filled flowable restorative material as a pit and fissure sealant. Oper Dent, 27: 325–29, 2002.

8. Corona S A M, Borsatto M C, Garcia L, Ramos RP, Palma-Dibb RG. Randomized controlled trial comparing the retention of a flowable restorative system with a conventional resin sealant; one year follow up. Int J of Pediatr Dent, 15: 44–50, 2005.

9. Xalabarde A, Garcia- Godoy F, Boj J R, Canaida C. Fissure micro morphology and sealant adaptation after occlusal enameloplasty. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 20(4): 299–304, 1996.

10. Ansari G, Oloomi K and Eslami B. Microleakage assessment of pit and fissure sealant with or without the use of pumice prophylaxis. Int J Pediatr Dent, 14: 272–78, 2004.

11. Loyola-Rodriguez JP, Mendoza V, Razo F, Rodriguez-Juarez R, Campos-Cambranis. Flowable resin used as a sealant in molars affected by dental fluorosis: A comparative study. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 30: 39–44, 2005.

12. Gillcrist JA, Vaughan M, Plumlee G, Wade G. Clinical sealant retention following two different tooth-cleaning techniques. Journal of Public Health Dentistry, 58: 254–256, 1998.

13. Youssef MN, Youssef FA,.Souza-Zaroni WC, Turbino ML, Vieira MMF. Effect of enamel preparation method on Invitro marginal microleakage of a flowable composite used as pit and fissure sealant. Int J Pediatr Dent, 16: 342–47, 2006.

14. Chan DCN, Summitt JB, Garcia-Godo F, Hilton TJ, Chung KH. Evaluation of different methods for cleaning and preparing occlusal fissures. Oper Dent, 24: 331–36, 1999.

15. Garcia-Godoy F, Medlock JW. An SEM study of the effects of air-polishing on fissure surfaces. Quintessence Int, 19: 465–7, 1988.

16. Hatibovic-Kofmann S, Butler SA, Sadek H. Microleakage of 3 sealants following Coventional, Bur and Air abrasion preparation of pits and fissures. Int J Pediatr Dent, 11: 409–16, 2001.

17. Geiger SB, Gulayev SG, Weiss EI. Improving fissure sealant quality; Mechanical preparation and filling level. J Dent, 28: 407–12, 2000.

18. Gungor HC, Turgut MD, Attar N, Altay N. Microleakage evaluation of a flowable polyacid modified resin composite used as a fissure sealant on air abraded permanent teeth. Oper Dent, 28: 267–73, 2003.

19. Miranda Grande RH, Reis A, Dourado A, Loguercio J, da Motta S, Shellard E, Christino Neto P. Adhesive systems used for sealing contaminated surfaces: a microleakage evaluation Braz. Oral Res, 19(1): Jan./Mar. 2005.

20. Theodoridou- Pahini S, Tolidis K, Papadogiannis Y. Degree of microleakage of some pit and fissure sealants: An invitro study. Int J Pediatr Dent, 6: 173–76, 1996.

21. Kwon HB, Park KB, SEM and Microleakage evaluation of 3 flowable composites as sealants without using bonding agents. Pediatr Dent, 27: 48–53, 2006.

22. Garcia-Godoy F, Borda de Araujo F. Enhancement of fissure sealant penetration and adaptability; The Enameloplasty technique. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 19: 13–18, 1994.

23. Droz D, Schiele,MJ Panighi MM. Penetration and microleakage of dental sealants in artificial fissures. J Dent Child, 71: 41–44, 2004.

24. Tandon S, Kumari R, Udupa S. The effect of etch-time on the bond strength of a sealant and on the etch-pattern in primary and permanent enamel: an evaluation. ASDC Journal of Dentistry for Children, 18: 6–90, 1989.

25. Celiberti P, Lussi A. Use of a self-etching adhesive on previously etched intact enamel and its effect on sealant microleakage and tag formation. J Dent, 33: 163–171, 2005.

26. Duangthip D, Lussi A. Variables contributing to the quality of fissure sealants used by general dental practitioners. Oper Dent, 28: 756–64, 2003.

27. Hannig M, Grafe A, Atalay S, Bott B. Microleakage and SEM evaluation of fissure sealants placed by use of self etching priming agents. J Dent, 32: 75–81, 2004.

28. Gwinnett AJ, Ripa LW Penetration of pit and fissure sealants into conditioned human enamel in vivo. Arch Oral Biol, 18: 435–439, 1973.

29. Garcia-Godoy F, Gwinnett AJ. An SEM study of fissure surfaces conditioned with a scraping technique. Clin Prev Dent, 9: 09–13, 1987.