Article Data

  • Views 1036
  • Dowloads 165

Original Research

Open Access

An in vitro Evaluation of Radicular Penetration of Hydrogen Peroxide from Bleaching Agents During Intra-Coronal Tooth Bleaching with an Insight of Biologic Response

  • Divya S Sharma1,*,
  • Sanjay Sharma1
  • SM Natu2
  • Satish Chandra2

1Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Modern Dental College and Research, Indore (MP), India

2Department of Chemical Pathology, CSM Medical University (formerly King George’s Medical College), Lucknow (UP), India.

DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.35.3.q83063560x866037 Vol.35,Issue 3,May 2011 pp.289-294

Published: 01 May 2011

*Corresponding Author(s): Divya S Sharma E-mail: drdivyaagra@yahoo.co.in

Abstract

External root resorption is the complication of intra-coronal bleaching done with 30% H2O2 alone or mixed with sodium perborate but not with sodium perborate mixed with water. The study was done to comparatively evaluate the H2O2 leakage from three H2O2 liberating bleaching agents. Study design: Fifty one single rooted human teeth were used. After root canal therapy gutta percha was removed below cemento-enamel junction. Three bleaching agents: sodium perborate mixed with water , sodium perborate mixed with 30% H2O2 and 30% H2O2 alone were used. Teeth without defect , with cervical root defect and with mid root defect constituted group A, group B and group C. According to various bleaching agents groups were subdivided into subgroup 1, 2 and 3. H2O2 leakage was measured with the help of spectrophotometer. Results: Almost all teeth showed H2O2 leakage. It was maximum in B1 followed by C1, B2, A1, A2, C2, B3, A3 and C3. Conclusion: Sodium perborate mixed with water was found to be the best bleaching agent.

Keywords

hydrogen peroxide, intra-coronal tooth bleaching.

Cite and Share

Divya S Sharma,Sanjay Sharma,SM Natu,Satish Chandra. An in vitro Evaluation of Radicular Penetration of Hydrogen Peroxide from Bleaching Agents During Intra-Coronal Tooth Bleaching with an Insight of Biologic Response. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2011. 35(3);289-294.

References

1. Galen W. Wagnild, Kathy I. Mueller. Restoration of the Endodontically Treated Tooth. In: Pathways Of Pulp, Stephen Cohen, Kenneth M. Hargreaves, 9th edn., Mosby, Elseveir Science, 786–821, 2006.

2. Weisman MI et al. An efficient bleaching procedure for the pulpless tooth. Dental Digest, 69: 346–348, 1963.

3. Nutting EB, Poe GS. Chemical bleaching of discolored endodontically treated teeth. Dent Clin North Am, 11: 655–62, 1967.

4. Chandra S. Bleaching of discoloured non-vital teeth. JIDA, October: 157–61, 1967.

5. Andreasen JO, Andreasen FM, Andersson L. Textbook and color atlas of Traumatic Injuries to the Teeth, 4th edition, Blackwell publishing; Munksgaard, p. 853, 2008.

6. Souza ADS, Garini G., Bertotti M. In vitro evaluation of hydrogen peroxide and calcium hydroxide diffusion during intra-coronary bleaching. ECLER Endod, v.1 n.1 Sã o Paulo Ene./Abr, 1999.

7. Rotstein I, Torek Y, Misgav R. Effect of cementum defects on radicular penetrations of 30% H2O2 during intracoronal bleaching. J Endodon, 17(5): 230–3, 1991.

8. Rotstein I, Lehr Z, Gedalia I: Effect of bleaching agents on inorganic component of human dentine and cements. J Endodon, 18(6): 290–293, 1993.

9. Titley K., Tornet CD, Smith D. The effects of concentrated hydrogen peroxide solutions on the surface morphology of human tooth enamel. J Endodon, 14: 68–73, 1988.

10. Oliveira DP, Teixeira ECN, Ferraz CCR, Teixeira FB: Effect of Intracoronal Bleaching Agents on Dentine Microhardness. J Endodon, 33: 460–462, 2007.

11. Ellias E., Sajjan G. Effects of bleaching on microleakage of resin composite restorations in non-vital teeth: An in vitro study. Endodont, 14: 9–13, 2002.

12. Floyd R. A. The effects of peroxides and free radicals on body tissues. JADA, 128: 37S–40S, 1997.

13. Ari H., Ungor M. In vitro comparision of different types of sodium perborate used for intracoronal bleaching of discoloured teeth. Int. Endod J, 23: 167–9, 2002.

14. Spasser HF. A simple bleaching technique using SP. NY State Dent J, 27: 332–4, 1961.

15. Holmstrup G, Palm AM, Harry LH. Bleaching of discoloured root filled teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol, 4: 197–201, 1988.

16. Weiger R, Kuhn A, Lost C. Effect of various types of sodium perborate on the pH of bleaching agents. J Endodon, 19(5): 239–41, 1993.

17. Schroeder HE, Scherle WF. Cemento-enamel junction revisited. J Periodont Res, 23: 53–59, 1988.

18. Abubara A. Biomechanical aspect of External Root Resorption in Orthodontic Therapy. Med Oral Patol Cir Bucal, 12(8): e 610–3, Dec 1, 2007.

19. Karring T, Nyman S, Lindhe T, Sirirat M. Potentials for Root Resorption during Periodontal Wound Healing. J Clin Periodontal, 11: 41–52, 1984.

20. Rotstein I, Friedman S. pH variation among materials used for intracoronal bleaching. J Endodon, 17: 376–79, 1991.

21. Thurman RG, Ley HG, Scholz R. Hepatic microsomal ethanol oxidation. Eur J Biochem, 25: 420–430, 1972.

22. Dahl JE, Pallesen U. Tooth Bleaching – A Critical Review of the Biological Aspects. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med, 14(4): 292–304, 2003.

23. Imlay JA, Chin SM, Linn S. Toxic DNA damage by hydrogen peroxide through Fenton Reactions in vivo and in vitro. Science, 29 240, issue 4852: 640–642, April 1988.

24. “http://www.rsc.org/Education/EiC/issues/2007May/ExhibitionChemistry.as”

25. “http://www.lenntech.com/Fenton-reaction.htm”

26. DA Wink, RW Nims, JE Saavedra, WE Utermahlen, PC Ford. The fenton oxidation mechanism: reactivities of biologically relevant substrates with two oxidizing intermediates differ from those predicted for the hydroxyl radical. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 91 (14): 6604–8, JUL 5, 1994.

27. “http://www.h2o2.com/intro/faq.htm”

28. Gardnera AM et.al., Apoptotic vs. Nonapoptotic Cytotoxicity Induced by Hydrogen Peroxide. Free Radical Biology & Medicine, 22 Issue 1–2: 73–83, 1997.

29. Crawford DR, Davies KJA. Adaptive Response and oxidantive stress. Environ Health Perspect, 102(Suppl 10): 25–28, 1994.

30. Gaetani GF, HN Kirkman, R Mangerini, AM Ferraris. Importance of catalase in the disposal of hydrogen peroxide within human erythrocytes. Blood, 84: 325–330, 1994.

31. Sherwood AI, Miglani RS, Lakshminarayan L. Efficacy of glass ionomer as a barrier material in non-vital bleaching – A stereomicroscopic study. Endodon, 16: 12–15, 2004.

32. Liu Z, Tao X, Zhang C, Lu Yanhua, Wei D. Protective effects of hyperoside(quercetin-3-o-galactase) to PC12 cells against cytotoxicity induced by hydrogen peroxide and tert-butyl hydroperoxide. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, 59, Issue 9,: 481–490, October 2005.

33. Hong Hao, Liu GQ. Protection against hydrogen peroxide-induced cytotoxicity in PC12 cells by scutellarin. Life Sciences, 74 Issue 24,30 April: 2959–2973, 2004.

34. Rotstein I. Role of catalase in the elimination of residual hydrogen peroxide following tooth bleaching. J Endodon, 19: 567–569, 14; 147(19): 887–93, 1993.

35. Farmer DS, Burcham P, Marin PD. The Ability of Thiourea to Scavange H2O2 Peroxide and Hydroxyl Radicals during the Intra-Coronal Bleaching of Blood Stained Root- Filled Teeth. Australian Dental Journal, 51(2):146–152, 2006.

36. Goth L et.al. The H2O2 paradox. Orv Hetil, May 2006.

37. “http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1177387”

38. “http://www.patient.co.uk/showdoc/400011785/”

39. Rotstein I, Zyskind D, Lewenstein I, Bamberger N. Effect of Different Protective Base Materials on Hydrogen Peroxide Leakage During Intracoronal Bleaching in vitro. J Endodon, 18(3): 114–117, 1992.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 1.8 (2023) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top