A Digital Method to Predict the Mesiodistal Widths of Canines and Premolars in an Egyptian Sample

Treatment planning in the mixed dentition is important for proper tooth alignment. A mixed dentition analysis, should accurately predict the mesiodistal widths of unerupted permanent teeth. The aim of the present study was to determine which sum of mesiodistal widths (MDW) of permanent teeth will be the best predictor for MDW of unerupted permanent canines and premolars. Study Design: The study was conducted on 102 Egyptians, 51 males and 51 females, mean age 16.7±0.5 years with fully erupted permanent teeth, and intact proximal surfaces. Dental casts were obtained and scanned to produce digital images that were used on a specially designed software program to measure the MDW of permanent teeth. Casts were divided into training and validation sets, where 9 models of tooth combinations were used to develop a regression equation that describes the relation between them and sum of MDW of erupted maxillary or mandibular canines, first and second premolars. The validation set was used to test the accuracy of the proposed equation. Results: R2 of regression models ranged from 0.3 (for models #2,4,5 and 8) to 0.36 for model #1. The highest regression in model #1 (sum of MDW of lower first permanent molars and upper central incisors) indicated a high linear association between the sum of MDW of tooth combination model #1 and the MDW of maxillary and mandibular permanent canines and premolars. There was no significant difference between the actual and the predicted MDW, when the proposed equation was checked for its accuracy in the entire validation set (p>0.05). Conclusion: The combination of the sums of lower permanent first molars and upper permanent central incisors was the best predictor for the MDW of both maxillary and mandibular permanent canines and premolars.The newly proposed prediction equation may be considered clinically useful for mixed dentition analysis in Egyptian subjects.

mixed dentition analysis,arch length, mesiodistal width, predicted width, children.

1. Rakosi T. Differential diagnosis and planning in treatment of malocclusion in the mixed dentition. In Graber TW. Orthodontics: State of the Art, Essence of the science. St Louis: CV Mosby Inc, pp. 120–9, 1986.

2. Bernabe E, Flores-Mir C. Estimating arch length discrepancy through little’s irregularity index for epidemiological use. Eur J Orthod, 28: 269–73, 2006.

3. Moyers RE. Handbook of Orthodontics for the Student and General practitioner. 3rd ed. Chicago: Yearbook medical publisher Inc, pp. 369–79, 1973.

4. Bishara SE, Fernandez GA, Jakobsen JR, Fahl JA. Mesiodistal crown dimensions in Mexico and the United States. Angle Orthodont, 56: 315–23, 1989.

5. Proffit WR, Sarver DM, Ackerman JL. Orthodontic diagnosis: The development of a problem list. In: Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary Orthodontics. 4th ed. St Louis, Missouri: Mosby Inc, pp. 195–201, 2007.

6. Nance HN. The limitation of orthodontic treatment I. Mixed dentition diagnosis and treatment. Am J Orthod Oral Surg, 33: 177–233, 1947.

7. Cohen MI. Recognition of the developing malocclusion. Dent Clin North Am, 6: 299–311, 1959.

8. De Paula S, Almedia de Oliveira MA, Lee PCF. Prediction of the mesiodistal diameter of unerupted lower canines and premolars using 45º cephalometric radiographs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 107: 309–14, 1995.

9. Carey CW. Linear arch dimensions and tooth size. Am J Orthod, 35: 762–75, 1946.

10. Seiple CM. Variation of tooth position, a metric study of the adaptation in the deciduous and permanent dentition. Svensk variation Tandlak Tidsker. 1946; 26: 39-44. Quoted from: Lee-Chan S, Jacobson BN, Chwa KH, Jacobson RS. Mixed dentition analysis for Asian-American. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 113: 293–9, 1998.

11. Ballard ML, Wylie WL. Mixed dentition case analysis-Estimating size of unerupted permanent teeth. Am J Orthod, 33: 754–9, 1947.

12. Moyers RE. Handbook of Orthodontics for Student and General Practitioner. Chicago: Yearbook medical publisher Inc, 1958, pp. 369–72.

13. Tanaka MM. Johnston LE. The prediction of the size of unerupted canines and premolars in a contemporary orthodontic population. J Am Dent Assoc, 88: 798–801, 1974.

14. Hixon EH, Oldfather RE. Estimation of the sizes of unerupted cuspid and bicuspid teeth. Angle Orthod, 28: 236–40, 1958.

15. Stahle H. Determination of mesiodistal crown width of unerupted permanent cuspids and bicuspids. Acta Odontol Helvetica, 3: 14–7, 1959.

16. Kaplan RG, Smith CC, Kanarek PH. An analysis of three mixed dentition analyses. J Dent Res, 56: 1337–43, 1977.

17. Staley RN, Kerber PE. A revision of the Hixon and Oldfather mixed dentition prediction method. Am J Orthod, 78: 296–302, 1980.

18. Bishara SE, Staley RN. Mixed dentition arch analysis step-by-step approach using the revised Hixon-Oldfather prediction method. Am J Orthod, 86: 130–5, 1986.

19. Dean JA, McDonald RE, Avery DR. Dentistry for the child and adolescent. 8th ed. Missouri. Mosby, Inc, pp. 627–683, 2004.

20. Paredes V, Gania JL, Cibrian R. A new, accurate and fast digital method to predict unerupted tooth size. Angle Orthod, 76: 14–9, 2006.

21. Buwembo W, Luboga S. Moyers method of mixed dentition analysis: a meta-analysis. Afr Health Sci, 4: 63–6, 2004.

22. Casamassimo PS, Christensen JR, Fields HW. Examination, Diagnosis, and treatment planning. In: Pinkham JR, Casamassimo PS, Fields HW, McTigue DJ, Nowak AJ. Pediatric Dentistry: Infancy through Adolescence. 4th ed. Missouri: Elsevier Inc, pp. 492–9, 2005.

23. Foster RR, Wylie WL. Arch length deficiency in mixed dentition. Am J Orthod, 44: 464–76, 1958.

24. Bull RL. Radiographic method to estimate the mesiodistal dimensions of unerupted teeth. Am J Orthod, 45: 711–2, 1959.

25. De Paula S, Almedia de Oliviera MA, Lee PCF. Prediction of the mesiodistal diameter of unerupted lower canines and premolars using 45º cephalometric radiographs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 107: 309–14, 1995.

26. Gardner RB. A comparison of four methods of predicting arch length. Am J Orthod, 75: 387–98, 1979.

27. Mok KH, Cooke MS. Space analysis: a comparison of sonic digitization (DigiGraph Workstation) and the digital calliper. Eur J Orthod, 20: 653–61, 1998.

28. Ferguson FS, Macko DJ, Sonnenberg EM, Shakun ML. The use of regression constants in estimating tooth size in Negro population. Am J Orthod, 73: 68–72, 1978.

29. Bishara SE, Jakobsen JR, Abdallah EM, Fernandez G. A comparison of mesiodistal and buccolingual crown dimensions of the permanent teeth in three populations from Egypt, Mexico and the United States. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 96: 416–22, 1989.

30. Al-Khadra BH. Prediction of the size of unerupted canines and premolars in a Saudi Arab population. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 104: 369–72, 1993.

31. Otuyemi OD, Noar JH. A comparison of crown size dimensions of the permanent teeth in a Nigerian and a British population. Eur J Orthod, 18: 623–8, 1996.

32. Al-Bitar ZB, Al-Omari LK, Sonbol HN, Al- Ahmad HT, Hamdan AM. Mixed dentition analysis in a Jordanian population. Angle Orthodont, 78: 670–5, 2008.

33. Abdallah EM. Arch length analysis in mixed dentition period. Master thesis, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, pp. 20–65, 1981.

34. Dowidar KS. Verification of Moyers’ arch length analysis on young Egyptian adults. Master thesis, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, pp. 1–43, 1982.

35. Schoonjans F, Zalata A, Depuydt CE, Comhaire FH. MedCalc: A new computer program for medical statistics. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine. 48: 257–62, 1995.

36. Graber TW. Orthodontics principles and practice. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company, pp. 335–84, 1967.

37. Bernabe E, Flores-Mir C. Are the lower incisors the best predictors for the unerupted canines and premolars? An analysis in a Peruvian sample. Angle Orthod, 75: 198–203, 2004.

38. Wheeler RC. Dental anatomy, Physiology and Occlusion. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Inc; 1993, pp. 102–29, 1993.

39. Bernabe E, Flores-Mir C, Major PW. Tooth-width ratio discrepancies in a sample of Peruvian adolescents. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 125: 361–5, 2004.

40. Bernabe E, Villanueva KM, Flores-Mir C. Tooth-width ratios in crowded and non-crowded dentitions. Angle Orthod, 74: 31–7, 2004.

41. Flores-Mir C, Bernabe E, Camus C, Carhuayo MA, Major PW. Prediction of mesiodistal canine and premolar tooth width in a sample of Peruvian adolescents. Orthod Craniofac Res, 6: 173–6, 2003.

42. Moyers RE. Handbook of Orthodontics. 4th ed. Chicago: Yearbook medical publishers Inc, pp. 235–40, 1988.

43. Nourallah AW, Gesch D, Khordaji MN, Spleith C. New regression equations for predicting the size of unerupted canines and premolars in a contemporary population. Angle Orthod, 72: 216–21, 2002.

44. Abu Alhaija ESJ, Qudeimat MA. Mixed dentition space analysis in a Jordanian population: comparison of two methods. Inter J Pediatr Dent, 16: 104–10, 2006.

45. Melgaco CA, Araujo MT, Ruellas AC. Mandibular permanent first molar and incisor width as predictor of mandibular canine and premolar width. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 132: 340–5, 2007.

46. Legovic M, Novosel A, Legovic A. Regression equations for determining mesiodistal crown diameters of canines and premolars. Angle Orthod, 73: 314–8, 2002.

47. Van der Merwe SW, Rossouw P, Van Wyk Kotze TJ, Trutero H. An adaptation of the Moyers mixed dentition space analysis for a Western Cape Caucasian population. J Dent Assoc S Afr,46: 475–9, 1991.

48. Lee-Chan S, Jacobson BN, Chwa KH, Jacobson RS. Mixed dentition analysis for Asian-American. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 113: 293–9, 1998.

49. Jaroontham J, Godfrey K. Mixed dentition analysis in a Thai population. Eur J Orthod, 22: 127–34, 2000.

50. Diagne F, Diop-BA K, Ngom PI, Mbow K. Mixed dentition analysis in a Senegalese population: elaboration of prediction tables. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 124: 178–83, 2003.