Analysis of Root Canal Treated Primary Incisor After Trauma: Two Year Outcomes

The low number of clinical studies of traumatized teeth submitted to root canal treatment is completely out of proportion to the seriousness that dental trauma imposes on children in early years. Aim. This study evaluates the outcomes of root canal treatment (RCT) in traumatized primary incisors and identifies the predisposing factors associated with therapy success. Methods: This is a retrospective study conducted with all dental records of 704 patients who had one or more teeth with traumatic injuries. Patients with irreversible pulp changes in primary teeth leading to RCT with a 24 month follow-up met the inclusion criteria. Results: Twenty-five maxillary incisors of 17 children were evaluated. The children’s age at the time of therapy ranged from 24 to 72 months (mean 47.3). Pulp necrosis was the most common disorder (84.0%) and pre-operative periapical lesions were observed in 52.0%. Coronal discoloration was found in 48.0%. The roots were filled with ZOE paste (68.0%) or Guedes-Pinto paste (32.0%). Overall RCT success rate was 68.0%. The absence of pre-operative periapical lesions (p =0.02) and pathological root resorption (p = 0.02) presented positive association with therapy success. Success was not associated to filling paste (p = 0.49), filling extent (p = 0.44), of discoloration (p = 0.39) nor the patients’ age (p = 0.59). Conclusions: RCT was considered successful in 68.0% of the cases at the 24 month follow-up. Failure of RCT in traumatized primary incisors was associated with pre-operatory periapical lesions and pathological root resorption. The filling paste, the filling extent and the patient’s age were unrelated with therapy success.

pulpectomy, trauma, primary teeth, deciduous teeth.

1. Borum MK, Andreasen JO. Sequelae of trauma to primary maxillary incisors. I. Complications in the primary dentition. Endod Dent Traumatol, 14: 31–44, 1998.

2. Soporowski NJ, Allred EN, Needleman HL. Luxation injuries of primary anterior teeth—prognosis and related correlates. Pediatr Dent, 16: 96–101, 1994.

3. Wilson CF. Management of trauma to primary and developing teeth. Dent Clin North Am, 39: 133–67, 1995.

4. Mackie IC, Warren VN. Dental trauma: 1. General aspects of management, and trauma to the primary dentition. Dent Update, 15: 155–6, 8–9, 1988.

5. Kenwood M, Seow WK. Sequelae of trauma to the primary dentition. J Pedod, 13: 230–8, 1989.

6. Flores MT. Traumatic injuries in the primary dentition. Dent Traumatol, 18: 287–98, 2002.

7. Holan G, Topf J, Fuks AB. Effect of root canal infection and treatment of traumatized primary incisors on their permanent successors. Endod Dent Traumatol, 8: 12–5, 1992.

8. Primosch RE, Ahmadi A, Setzer B, Guelmann M. A retrospective assessment of zinc oxide-eugenol pulpectomies in vital maxillary primary incisors successfully restored with composite resin crowns. Pediatr Dent, 27: 470–7, 2005.

9. Rocha MJ, Cardoso M. Federal University of Santa Catarina endodontic treatment of traumatized primary teeth - part 2. Dent Traumatol, 20: 314–26, 2004.

10. Holan G, Fuks AB. The diagnostic value of coronal dark-gray discoloration in primary teeth following traumatic injuries. Pediatr Dent, 18: 224–7, 1996.

11. Holan G. Conservative treatment of severely luxated maxillary primary central incisors: case report. Pediatr Dent, 21: 459–62, 1999.

12. Holan G. Development of clinical and radiographic signs associated with dark discolored primary incisors following traumatic injuries: a prospective controlled study. Dent Traumatol, 20: 276–87, 2004.

13. Coll JA, Sadrian R. Predicting pulpectomy success and its relationship to exfoliation and succedaneous dentition. Pediatr Dent, 18: 57–63, 1996.

14. Mortazavi M, Mesbahi M. Comparison of zinc oxide and eugenol, and Vitapex for root canal treatment of necrotic primary teeth. Int J Paediatr Dent, 14: 417–24, 2004.

15. Moskovitz M, Sammara E, Holan G. Success rate of root canal treatment in primary molars. J Dent, 33: 41–7, 2005.

16. Moskovitz M, Yahav D, Tickotsky N, Holan G. Long-term follow up of root canal treated primary molars. Int J Paediatr Dent, 20: 207–13, 2010.

17. Trairatvorakul C, Chunlasikaiwan S. Success of pulpectomy with zinc oxide-eugenol vs calcium hydroxide/iodoform paste in primary molars: a clinical study. Pediatr Dent, 30: 303–8, 2008.

18. Rocha MJ, Cardoso M. Survival analysis of endodontically treated traumatized primary teeth. Dent Traumatol, 23: 340–7, 2007.

19. Andreasen JO, Lauridsen E, Daugaard-Jensen J. Dental traumatology: an orphan in pediatric dentistry? Pediatr Dent, 31: 153–6, 2009.

20. AAPD. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry reference manual 2010-2011. Pediatr Dent, 2010–2011; 32: 1–334.

21. Flores MT, Malmgren B, Andersson L et al. Guidelines for the management of traumatic dental injuries. III. Primary teeth. Dent Traumatol, 23: 196–202, 2007.

22. Qudeimat MA, Al-Saiegh FA, Al-Omari Q, Omar R. Restorative treatment decisions for deep proximal carious lesions in primary molars. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent, 8: 37–42, 2007.

23. Cerqueira DF, Mello-Moura AC, Santos EM, Guedes-Pinto AC. Cytotoxicity, histopathological, microbiological and clinical aspects of an endodontic iodoform-based paste used in pediatric dentistry: a review. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 32: 105–10, 2008.

24. Holan G. Long-term effect of different treatment modalities for traumatized primary incisors presenting dark coronal discoloration with no other signs of injury. Dent Traumatol, 22: 14–7, 2006.

25. Tannure PN, Barcelos R, Portela MB, Gleiser R, Primo LG. Histopathologic and SEM analysis of primary teeth with pulpectomy failure. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 108: e29–33, 2009.

26. Fuks AB. Pulp therapy for primary and permanent teeth. In: R. PJ, Casamassino PS, Fields Jr HW, Mc Tigue DJ, Nowak A, eds. Pediatric Dentistry: Infancy Through Adolescence. 4th ed. St Louis: Elsevier Saunders Co 2005.

27 Nivoloni Tannure P, Barcelos R, Farinhas J, Guimaraes Primo L. Zinc oxide-eugenol paste retained in gingival mucosa after primary teeth pulpectomy. Eur J Paediatr Dent, 11: 101–2, 2010.

28 Garcia-Godoy F. Evaluation of an iodoform paste in root canal therapy for infected primary teeth. ASDC J Dent Child, 54: 30–4, 1987.

29 Sari S, Okte Z. Success rate of Sealapex in root canal treatment for primary teeth: 3-year follow-up. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 105: e93–6, 2008.

30 Barcelos R, Santos MAP, Primo L, Luiz RR, Maia LC. Root Canal Filling Materials for Primary Teeth: a Systematic Review. J Clin Ped Dent, 35(3): 241–248, 2010.

31 Barja-Fidalgo F, Moutinho-Ribeiro M, Oliveira M, Oliveira B. A Systematic Review of Root Canal Filling Materials for Deciduous Teeth: Is There an Alternative for Zinc Oxide-Eugenol? ISRN Dentistry, 2011: 1–7, 2010.