Palatal Soft Tissue Thickness at Different Ages Using an Ultrasonic Device

To evaluate the palatal soft tissue thickness among placement sites of temporary anchorage devices (TADs) in late mixed, early permanent and permanent dentition. Materials and Method: The sample consisted of three groups; 42 late mixed dentition (mean age = 11.0 years), 41 early permanent dentition (mean age = 13.8 years), and 38 permanent dentition (mean age = 23.1 years). Soft tissue thickness was measured intraorally with an ultrasonic device using a grid of 27, 4x4 mm² squares to delineate the measurement points. Repeated measures analysis of variance was performed to analyze the data. Results: There was a significant difference in soft tissue thickness among dentition groups with the permanent dentition group showing the highest values (P < 0.001). In each group, the thickness significantly increased from median to lateral and from anterior to posterior sites. Furthermore, the thickness showed a significant difference according to the arch form and gender (P < 0.05). However, there were no significant differences according to irregularity index and Angle classification. Conclusions: The soft tissue thickness of the palate increases from the late mixed to permanent dentition. These findings may be helpful for clinicians to enhance their successful application of TADs in the palate.

Palatal soft tissue thickness measurement, Ultrasonic device, Dentition, TADs

1. Papadopoulos MA and Tarawneh F. The use of miniscrew implants for temporary skeletal anchorage in orthodontics: a comprehensive review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 103: e6–15, 2007.

2. Kyung HM, Park HS, Bae SM, Sung JH, Kim IB. Development of orthodontic micro-implants for intraoral anchorage. J Clin Orthod, 37: 321–328, 2003.

3. Park YC, Kim CK, Lee JS. Atlas of Contemporary Orthodontics. 3rd Ed. Seoul, Korea: Shinheung International, 167–170, 2006.

4. Wara-aswapati N, Pitiphat W, Chandrapho N, Rattanayatikul C, Karimbux N. Thickness of palatal masticatory mucosa associated with age. J Periodontol, 72: 1407–1412, 2001.

5. Poggio PM, Incorvati C, Velo S, Carano A. ‘Safe zones’: a guide for miniscrew positioning in the maxillary and mandibular arch. Angle Orthod, 76: 191-197, 2006.

6. Januário AL, Barriviera M, Duarte WR. Soft tissue cone-beam computed tomography: a novel method for the measurement of gingival tissue and the dimensions of the dentogingival unit. J Esthet Restor Dent, 20: 366-73, 2008.

7. Barriviera M, Duarte WR, Januário AL, Faber J, Bezerra AC. A new method to assess and measure palatal masticatory mucosa by conebeam computerized tomography. J Clin Periodontol, 36: 564–568, 2009.

8. Song JE, Um YJ, Kim CS, Choi SH, Cho KS, Kim CK, et al. Thickness of posterior palatal masticatory mucosa: the use of computerized tomography. J Periodontol, 79: 406–412, 2008.

9. Ueno D, Sato J, Igarashi C, Ikeda S, Morita M, Shimoda S, et al. Accuracy of oral mucosal thickness measurements using spiral computed tomography. J Periodontol, 82: 829–836, 2011.

10. Löst C, Irion KM, Nussle W. Ultrasonic B-scans of the facial/oral periodontium in pigs. J Clin Periodontol, 16: 534–538, 1989.

11. Uchida H, Kobayashi K, Nagao M. Measurement in vivo of masticatory mucosal thickness with 20 MHz B-mode ultrasonic diagnostic equipment. J Dent Res, 68: 95–100, 1989.

12. Eger T, Müller HP, Heinecke A. Ultrasonic determination of gingival thickness. Subject variation and influence of tooth type and clinical features. J Clin Periodontol, 23: 839–845, 1996.

13. Studer SP, Allen EP, Rees TC, Kouba A. The thickness of masticatory mucosa in the human hard palate and tuberosity as potential donor sites for ridge augmentation procedures. J Clin Periodontol, 68: 145–151, 1997.

14. Müller HP, Schaller N, Eger T. Ultrasonic determination of thickness of masticatory mucosa: a methodologic study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 88: 248–253, 1999.

15. Müller HP, Heinecke A, Schaller N, Eger T. Masticatory mucosa in subjects with different periodontal phenotypes. J Clin Periodontol, 27: 621–626, 2000.

16. Müller HP, Schaller N, Eger T, Heinecke A. Thickness of masticatory mucosa. J Clin Periodontol, 27: 431–436, 2000.

17. Schulze RK, Curić D, d’Hoedt B. B-mode versus A-mode ultrasonographic measurements of mucosal thickness in vivo. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 93: 110–117, 2002.

18. Kook YA, Kim SH, Chung KR, A modified palatal anchorage plate for simple and efficient distalization. J Clin Orthod, 44: 719–730, 2010.

19. Cha BK, Lee YH, Lee NK, Choi DS, Baek SH, Soft tissue thickness for placement of an orthodontic miniscrew using an ultrasonic device. Angle Orthod, 78: 403–408, 2008.

20. Kim HJ, Yun HS, Park HD, Kim DH, Park YC. Soft-tissue and cortical-bone thickness at orthodontic implant sites. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 130: 177–182, 2006.

21. Little RM. The irregularity index: a quantitative score of mandibular anterior alignment. Am J Orthod, 68: 554–563, 1975.

22. Melsen B, Graham J, Baccetti T, Koga M, Boyd R, Park J, et al. Factors contributing to the success or failure of skeletal anchorage devices: an informal JCO survey J Clin Orthod, 44: 714–718, 2010.

23. Moon SH, Park SH, Lim WH, Chun YS. Palatal bone density in adult subjects: Implications for mini-implant placement Angle Orthod, 80: 137–144, 2010.

24. Kang S, Lee SJ, Ahn SJ, Heo MS, Kim TW. Bone thickness of the palate for orthodontic mini-implant anchorage in adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 131: S74–S81, 2007.

25. Chang MT, Kim HS, Lee KW. A study on the reliability of an ultrasonic measurement device (SDM). J Korean Acad Periodontol, 30: 483–490, 2000.

26. Lawson RB, Jones ML. An evaluation of a noninvasive method of assessing alveolar bone levels in an experimental model of cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 35: 1–8, 1998.

27. Gedrange T, Mai R, Mack F, Zietek M, Borsos G, Vegh A, Spassov A, Gredes T. Evaluation of shape and size changes of bone and remodelled bone substitute after different fixation methods. J Physiol Pharmacol, 59: 87–94, 2008.

28. Moelans CB, ter Hoeve N, van Ginkel JW, ten Kate FJ, van Diest PJ. Formaldehyde substitute fixatives. Analysis of macroscopy, morphologic analysis, and immunohistochemical analysis. Am J Clin Pathol, 136: 548–556, 2011.