Premedication Intake Behavior – Does It Predict Behavior During Dental Treatment?

to investigate whether behavior during hydroxyzine administration predicts children’s behavior during dental treatment and whether behavior during treatment is affected by the complexity of treatment. Materials and method: 118 children aged 2 to 6.5 years old were treated under conscious sedation with oral premedication (3.7 mg/kg of hydroxyzine in a concentration of 50mg/5 cc. hydroxyzine) and 50% nitrous oxide/oxygen sedation. Children were divided in two age groups: aged 2 to ≤ 4 years old, and aged 4 > to 6 years old. Behavior during first examination; cooperation during premedication administration, cooperation during nitrous oxide nose-mask placement, behavior during dental treatment, treatment duration and complexity of treatment were recorded. Results: More children in the older group took the premedication willingly (p=0.026). Significant correlation (p=0.002) between behavior during examination and nitrous oxide mask acceptance was found in the older age group. No correlation was found regarding the cooperation during premedication intake and behavior during treatment within and between age groups. No statistical differences within the groups and between the groups were found between complexity of treatment and behavior during treatment. Conclusions: Premedication intake is not a reliable predictive tool for behavior during treatment in children aged 2-6.5 years. Complexity of treatment does not influence behavior during treatment in children aged 2-6.5 years

1. Wright GZ. Behavior management in dentistry for children, Philadelphia 1975, WB Saunders. Children’s behavior in dental office, pages 55–87.

2. Arnrup K, Broberg AG, Berggren U, Bodin L. Lack of cooperation in pediatric dentistry—the role of child personality characteristics. Pediatr Dent, 24(2): 119–28, 2002.

3. Guideline on Use of Anesthesia Personnel in the Administration of Office-based Deep Sedation/General Anesthesia to the Pediatric Dental Patient American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry – 2010–11 Definitions, Oral Health Policies, and Clinical Guidelines. Pediatr Dent, Reference Manual, 32(6): 10–11.

4. Nathan JE. Effective and safe pediatric oral conscious sedation: philosophy and practical considerations. Alpha Omegan, 99(2): 78–82, 2006.

5. Paterson SA, Tahmassebi JF. Paediatric dentistry in the new millennium: 3. Use of inhalation sedation in paediatric dentistry. Dent Update, 30(7): 350–6, 358, 2003.

6. Silegy T, Jacks ST. Pediatric oral conscious sedation. J Calif Dent Assoc, 31(5): 413-8, 2003.

7. Silegy T, Kingston RS. An overview of outpatient sedation and general anesthesia for dental care in California. J Calif Dent Assoc, 31(5): 405–12, 2003.

8. Shapira J, Holan G, Botzer E, Kupietzky A, Tal E, Fuks AB. The effectiveness of midazolam and hydroxyzine as sedative agents for young pediatric dental patients. ASDC J Dent Child, 63(6): 421–5, 1996.

9. Baygin O, Bodur H, Isik B. Effectiveness of premedication agents administered prior to nitrous oxide/oxygen. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 27(4): 341–6, 2010.

10. Radis FG, Wilson S, Griffen AL, Coury DL. Temperament as a predictor of behavior during initial dental examination in children. Pediatr Dent, 16(2): 121–7, 1994.

11. Quinonez R, Santos RG, Boyar R, Cross H. Temperament and trait anxiety as predictors of child behavior prior to general anesthesia for dental surgery. Pediatr Dent, 19(6): 427–31, 1997.

12. Allen KD, Hodges ED, Knudsen SK.Comparing four methods to inform parents about child behavior management: how to inform for consent. Pediatr Dent, 17(3): 180–6, 1995.

13. Isik B, Baygin O, Kapci EG, Bodur H. The effects of temperament and behavior problems on sedation failure in anxious children after midazolam premedication. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 27(4): 336–40, 2010.

14. Corkey B, Freeman R Predictors of dental anxiety in six-year-old children: findings from a pilot study. ASDC J Dent Child, 61(4): 267–71, 1994.

15. Primosch RE, Bender F. Factors associated with administration route when using midazolam for pediatric conscious sedation. ASDC J Dent Child, 68(4): 233–8, 228, 2001.

16. Frankl SN, Shiere FR, Fogels HR: Should the parent remain with the child in the dental operatory? ASDC J Dent Child, 29: 150–63, 1962.

17. Adewumi A, Hall M., Guelmann M., RileyJ: The incidence of adverse reactions following 4% Septocaine (Articaine) in children. Pediatr Dent, 30(5): 424–428, 2008.

18. Houpt M, Manetas C, Joshi A, Desjardins P. effects of chloral hydrate on nitrous oxide sedation of children. Ped Dent, 11(1): 26–29, 1989.

19. Lochary ME, Wilson S, Griffen AL, Coury DL.Temperament;as a predictor of behavior for conscious sedation in dentistry. Pediatr Dent, 15(5): 348–52, 1993.

20. Allen KD, Hutfless S, Larzelere R. Evaluation of two predictors of child disruptive behavior during restorative dental treatment. J Dent Child (Chic), 70(3): 221–5, 2003.