Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Cariogenic Potential of Pediatric Liquid Medicaments– An in vitro Study
1Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, the Oxford Dental College, Hospital and Research Centre, Bommanahalli, Hosur Road, Karnataka, India.
DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.36.4.nt11584612462t84 Vol.36,Issue 4,July 2012 pp.357-362
Published: 01 July 2012
*Corresponding Author(s): Subramaniam P E-mail: drpriyapedo@yahoo.com
Pediatric liquid medicaments (PLM) are popular and are easily accepted by both parents and children. They are widely prescribed and easily available. However the sugar content and properties of these preparations determines their cariogenic potential. Aims and Objectives: This study assessed the pH and viscosity of pediatric liquid medicaments, type and concentration of sugars present in them and their effect on the growth of Streptococcus mutans. Methodology: PLM included two each of the most commonly prescribed analgesics, antibiotics, nutritional supplements, antitussive and antiepileptic preparations. The endogenous pH was measured using a digital pH meter and the viscosity was measured using a digital Brookefield viscometer. Analysis of sugars (sucrose, glucose and sorbitol) was performed using High Performance Liquid Chromatography. The effect of PLM on Streptococcus mutans was done by ditch plate method. Results: The pH of PLM ranged from 3.70 to 7.04 and viscosity varied from 307.33cP to 2408.33cP. Fifty percent of the PLM contained sucrose, glucose and sorbitol, and sucrose was present in nine of the PLM. The antibiotic preparations showed zones of inhibition against growth of streptococcus mutans. Conclusions: The physical properties of Pediatric Liquid Medicaments as well as the type and concentration of sugars present in them can be indicative of their cariogenic potential.
pediatric liquid medicaments, cariogenic, pH, viscosity, sucrose, streptococcus mutans.
Nandan N,Subramaniam P. Cariogenic Potential of Pediatric Liquid Medicaments– An in vitro Study. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2012. 36(4);357-362.
1. Babu KL, Rai K, Hegde AM. pH of medicated syrups—does it really matter?—an in vitro study: Part-II. J Clin Pediatr Dent, Winter 33(2): 137–42, 2008.
2. Policy on Caries Assesment Tool (CAT). Oral Health Policies American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry Guidelines. Pediatr Dent, 2005.
3. Milano M. A cross-Sectional Study of Medication-Related Factors and Caries Experience in Asthmatic Children. Pediatr Dent, 28: 415–419, 2006.
4. Sahgal J, Sood PB, Raju OS. A comparison of oral hygiene status and dental caries in children on long term liquid oral medications to those not administered with such medications.J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent, Dec; 20(4): 144–51, 2002.
5. Maguire A, Rugg-Gunn AJ. Prevalence of long term use of liquid oral medicines by children in northern region, England. Community Dent Health, 11: 91–96, 1994.
6. Neves BG, Pierro VS, Mia LC, Pediatricians’ Perceptions of the Use of Sweetened Medications Related to Oral Health. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 32(2): 133–138, 2007.
7. Bradley M, Kinirons M. A survey of factors influencing the prescribing of sugarfree medicines for children by a group of general medical practitioners in Northern Ireland. Int J Paediatr Dent, Dec; 6(4): 261–4, 1996.
8. Rekola M. In vivo acid production from medicines I n syrup form. Caries Res, 23(6): 412–6, 1989.
9. Lima KT, Almeida ICS, Senna ETL. Sweeteners and endogenous pH of pediatric medicines [Abstract B-110]. J Dent Res, 79: 11302000.
10. Fiegel RJ, Jensen ME, Mensing CA. Dental caries related to liquid medications Pediatrics, 68: 416–419, 1981.
11. Sunitha S, Prashanth GM; Shanmukhappa, Chandu GN, Subba Reddy VV. An analysis of concentration of sucrose, endogenous pH, and alteration in the plaque pH on consumption of commonly used liquid pediatric medicines. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent, Jan- Mar; 27(1): 44–8, 2009.
12. Pierro V S. Abdelur J P, Maia L C, TrugoL C. free sugar concentration and pH of paediatric medicines in Brazil. Community Dental Health, 22, 180–183, 2005.
13. Milano M. A cross-Sectional Study of Medication-Related Factors and Caries Experience in Asthmatic Children. Pediatr Dent, 28: 415–419, 2006.
14. Neves BG, Farah A, Lucas E, de Souza VP, Maia LC. Are pediatric medicines risk factors for dental caries and dental erosion? Community Dent Health, 27(1): 46–51, 2010.
15. Prashanth GM, Chandu GN, Muralikrishna KS, Shafiulla MD. The effect of mango and neem extract on four organisms causing dental caries: Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus salivavius, Streptococcus mitis, and Streptococcus sanguis: an invitro study. Indian J Dent Res, 18(4), 148–151, 2007.
16. Akpata ES, Akinrimisi EO. Antibacterial activity of extracts from some African chewing sticks. Oral Surg, 44: 717–22, 1977.
17. Asuquo BI, Montefiore D. Preliminary studies on the anti-bacterial properties of chewing sticks. J Dent, 177: 5; 123–7, 1998.
18. Pomorico L, Czauski G, Potela MB, Kneipp L, de Araujo Soares RM, de Araujo Castro GFB. Cariogenic and erosive potential of the medication used by HIV infected children: pH and sugar concentration. Comm Dental Health, 25, 170–175, 2008.
19. Bigeard L. The role of medication and sugars in pediatric dental patients. Dent Clin North Am, Jul; 44(3): 443–56, 2000
20. Mentes A. pH changes in dental plaque after using sugar-free pediatric medicine. J Clin Pediatr Dent, Summer; 25(4): 307–12, 2001.
21. Kenny DJ, Somaya P. Sugar load of oral liquid medication on chronically ill children. J Can Dent Assoc, Jan; 55(1): 43–6, 1989.
22. Costa CC, Almeida IC, Costa Filho LC. Erosive effect of an antihistamine-containing syrup on primary enamel and its reduction by fluoride dentifrice. Int J Paediatr Dent, May; 16(3): 174–80, 2006.
23. Roberts GJ, Roberts IF. Dental disease in chronically sick children. J Dent Child, 48: 346–351, 1981. 24. Fry J, Brooks D, McColl I. NHS data Book. Lancaster; MTP Press, 1984
25. Parmesh H. Epidemiology of Asthma in India. Indian J Pediatr, 69(4): 309–312, 2002.
26. Marathaki E, Pollard MA, Curzon ME. The effect of sucrose in medicines on plaque pH. Int J Paediatr Dent, Dec; 5(4): 231–5, 1995.
27. Rugg-Gunn AJ, Maguire A, Gordon PH, McCabe JF, Stephenson G. Comparison of erosion of dental enamel by four drinks using an intra oral appliance. Caries Res, 32: 337–343, 1998.
28. Lussi and Jaeggi; Chemical factors. In Lussi A. editor. Dental erosion. Monographs in Oral Science. Basel: Karger, 20, 112–18, 2006.
29. Maguire A, Baqir W, Nunn JH. Are sugars-free medicines more erosive than sugars-containing medicines? An in vitro study of paediatric medicines with prolonged oral clearance used regularly and long-term by children. Int J Paediatr Dent, Jul; 17(4): 231–8, 2007.
30. Nik-Hussein NN, Razak IA, Karim MN. An analysis of sugar content of commonly used pediatric liquid medicines—its revelance in dentistry. Singapore Dent J, 13(1): 24–6, 1988.
31. Neiva A, Silva VS, Maia LC, Trugo LC. Analise in vitro da concentracao de sacarose e pH de antibacterianos de uso pediatrico. Pesquisa Brasileria em Odontopediatria e Clinica Integrada, 1: 9–16, 2001.
32. Moss SJ. Dental erosion. Int Dent J, Dec; 48(6): 529–39, 1998.
33. Drumond MR S,Leal C, Olivera CB, Mederios LADM, Fonseca JGJ. Analise da concentracao de sacarose e pH de medicamentos pediatricos disponiveis na cidade de Jaoa Pessoa-PB. Odontolgia ClinicoClentitca, supl 4, 56, 2005.
34. Masters NJ. Medication caries: a dental myth? Practitioner, (231): 56–64, 1987.
35. Karjalainen S, Rekola M, Stanberg MR. Long term effects of syrup medications for recurrent otits media on the dental health of 6 to 8- year-old children. Caries Res, 26(4): 310–4, 1992.
36. Nizel AE, Papas AS. Nutrition in Clinical Dentistry, 3rd Ed Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders, p. 132–140, 2002.
37. Johansson AK, Sorvari R, Birkhed D, Meurman JH. Dental erosion in deciduous teeth—an in vivo & in vitro study; J Dent, (5): 333–40, 2001.
Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.
Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.
Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.
JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.
Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.
BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.
Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.
Scopus: CiteScore 1.8 (2023) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.
Top