Sedative Effects of Oral Midazolam, Intravenous Midazolam and Oral Diazepam

To evaluate and compare the behavioral changes and effect of sedative techniques in pediatric dental patients using Oral Midazolam, Intravenous Midazolam and Oral Diazepam as sedative agents. Materials and Methods: Triple blind randomized control trial with 40 patients aged between 2-10 years, exhibiting definitely negative behavior was considered. Patients were randomly assigned to one of the four treatment groups. Group I received midazolam 0.5mg/kg orally, Group II received 0.5mg/kg diazepam orally, Group III received 0.06mg/kg midazolam intravenously and Group IV received oral placebo. Behavioral changes (sleep, crying, movement, and overall behavior) and effect of sedative techniques on pediatric patients were assessed. Results: All the patients in group 3 were significantly better in post administrative behavior viz. sleep, crying and movement. Over all behavior scores for group 3 patients were significantly better than other three groups (p<0.001). Positive behavior of patients in group 2 and 3 did not show significant difference but positive behavior in group 3 was significantly (p<0.05) more than group 2. Placebo group showed the highest negative behavior. Conclusion: Sedative effects of oral midazolam and oral diazepam were comparable, where as intravenous midazolam produced more sedation. Anxiolysis was found to be more in both the midazolam groups than the diazepam group. Most number of positive changes were observed in midazolam groups as compared to diazepam group.

Behavior, Diazepam, Midazolam, oral, Conscious sedation, Pediatric dental patients.

1. Lawrence SM, McTigue DJ, Wilson S, Odom JG, Waggoner WF, Fields HW Jr. Parental attitudes towards behavior management techniques used in pediatric dentistry. Pediatr Dent, 13: 151–155, 1991.

2. Murphy MG, Fields HW Jr., Machen JB. Parental acceptance of pediatric dentistry behavior management techniques. Pediatr Dent, 6: 193–198, 1984.

3. Kain ZN, Mayes CC, O’Connor TZ, Cicchetti DV. Preoperative anxiety in children: Predictors and outcomes. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, 150: 1238–1245, 1996.

4. Kotiniemi LH, Ryhanen PT, Moilanen IK. Behavioral changes in children following day-case surgery: A four week follow-up of 551 children. Anaesthesia, 52: 970–976, 1997.

5. American academy of pediatric dentistry. “Guidelines for the elective use of conscious sedation, Deep sedation, General anesthesia in pediatric patients.” Pediatr Dent, 21(5): 68–73, 1999.

6. Houpt MI, Sheskin RB, Koenigsberg. “Assessing chloral hydrate dosage for young children”. ASDC J Dent Child, 52(3): 364–369, 1985.

7. Camm JH et al. “Behavioral changes of children undergoing dental treatment using sedation verses general anesthesia”. Pediatr Dent, 9(2): 111–117, 1987.

8. Barclay JK, Hunter KM, McMillan W. “Midazolam and diazepam compared as sedatives for outpatient surgery under local analgesia”. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 59: 349–355, 1985.

9. Tolia V, Fleming SL, Kauffman RE. “Randomized, double blind trial of midazolam and diazepam for endoscopic sedation in children.” Dev Pharmacol Ther, 14: 141–47, 1990.

10. Saxen MA, Wilson S, Paravecchio R. “Anesthesia for pediatric dentistry.” In: Anesthesia in dentistry, Saxen MA (Ed.). Dent Clin N Am, 43(2): 231–245, 1999.

11. Fell D, Gough MB, Northan AA et al. “Diazepam premedication in children: plasma levels and clinical effects.” Anesth, 40: 12–17, 1985.

12. Brandt SK, Bugg JL Jr. “Problems of medication with the pediatric patient”. In: symposium on pharmacology and therapeutics. Dent Clin N Am, 28(3): 563–579, 1984.

13. Houpt MI, Kupietzky A, Tofsky NS. “Effects of nitrous oxide on diazepam sedation of young children.” Pediatr Dent, 18(3): 236–241, 1996.

14. Kupietzky A, Houpt MI. “Midazolam; a review of its use of conscious sedation for children.” Pediatr Dent 15(4): 237–241, 1993.

15. Parnis SJ, Foate JA, Vander Walt JH. “Oral midazolam is an effective premedication for children having day-stay anesthesia”. Anaesth Intensive Care, 20(1): 9–14, 1992.

16. Mc Cann ME, Kain ZN. The management of preoperative anxiety in children: An Update. Anesth & Anal, 93(1): 98–105, 2001.

17. AL-Zaharine AM, Wyne AH, Sheta SA. Comparison of midazolam with a combination of oral midazolam and nitrous oxide-oxygen inhalation in the effectiveness of dental sedation for young children. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent, 27(1): 9–16, 2009.

18. Roelofse JA, Biji PV. “Cardiac dysrhythmias associated with intravenous lorazepam, Diazepam, and midazolam during oral surgery.” J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 52: 247–250, 1994.

19. Kantovitz KR, Puppin-Rontani RN, Dgaviao MB. Sedative effect of oral diazepam and chloral hydrate in the dental treatment of children. Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent, 25(2): 69–75, 2007.

20. Vetter TR. “A comparison of midazolam, diazepam and placebo as oral anesthetic premedicants in younger children”. J Clin Anesth, 5(1): 58–61, 1993.

21. Knott JC, Taylor D, Castle DJ. Randomized clinical trial comparing intravenous midazolam and droperidol for sedation of the acutely agitated patient in the emergency department. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 47(1): 61–67, 2006.

22. Sievers TD, Yee JD, Foley ME, Blanding PJ, Berde CB. “Midazolam for conscious sedation during pediatric oncology procedures; safety and recovery parameters”. Pediatrics, 88(6): 1172–1179, 1991.

23. Mc Cluskey A, Meakin GH. Oral administration of midazolam as a premedicant for pediatric day-case anaesthesia. Anaesthesia, 49(9): 782–785, 1994.

24. Uldam B, Hottonsten A-L, Poulsen S. Midazolam conscious sedation in large Danish municipal dental service for children and adolescents. International Journal of Pediatric Dentistry, 18(4): 256–261, 2008.

25. Damle SG, Gandhi M, Laheri V. Comparison of oral ketamine and oral midazolam as sedative agents in pediatric dentistry. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent, 26, 97–101, 2008.