Effectiveness of Two Flavored Topical Anesthetic Agents in Reducing Injection Pain in Children: A Comparative Study

Topical anesthesia is widely advocated in pediatric dentistry practice to reduce pain and anxiety produced by administration of local anesthesia. There are different combinations of topical anesthetic agents that are marketed worldwide. However, sparse literature reports exist regarding clinical efficacy of these agents. Aim: To compare the clinical effectiveness of two strawberry flavored topical anesthetics viz. Precaine⁰ (8% Lidocaine + 0.8% Dibucaine) and Precaine⁰ B (20% Benzocaine) in children before intra oral local anesthetic injections and for extraction of mobile primary teeth. Study Design: This triple blind clinical study included sixty children divided equally under three techniques — palatal injections, inferior alveolar nerve block and extraction of mobile primary teeth. Both the products were used alternately using split mouth design in two visits and the child's pain response was assessed using VAS and SEM pain scale. The scores obtained were subjected to statistical analysis. Results: Precaine⁰ has shown lower mean scores in all the techniques under both the pain scales, but were statistically insignificant. Gender wise comparison has also shown lower mean scores for Precaine⁰ for both males and females, however these were statistically insignificant. On visit wise comparison, Precaine⁰ B reported significant lower scores (p<0.05) in visit 2 compared to visit 1 for inferior alveolar nerve block and extraction of mobile primary teeth under SEM pain scale. Conclusion: Precaine⁰ (8% Lidocaine + 0.8% Dibucaine) can be used as effectively as Precaine⁰ B (20% Benzocaine).

Topical anesthesia, Lidocaine, Benzocaine, VAS: Precaine, Dibucaine

1. Leopold A, Wilson S, Weaver JS and Moursi AM. Pharmacokinetics of lidocaine delivered from a transmucosal patch in children. Anesth Prog, 49: 82–7, 2002.

2. Meechan  JG.  Intraoral  topical  anesthesia.  Perio  2000  J,  46:  56–79, 2008.

3. McDonald RE, Avery DR, Dean JA. Dentistry for the child and ado-lescent. 9th ed. Elsevier, New Delhi; 241–2, 2011.

4. Meechan JG. Effective topical anesthetic agents and techniques. Dent Clin N Am, 46: 759–66, 2002.

5. Martin  MD,  Ramsay  DS,  Whitney  C,  Fiset  L,  Weinstein  P.  Topical anesthesia: Differentiating the pharmacological an psychological con-tributions to efficacy. Anesth Prog, 41: 40–7, 1994.

6. Bagesund M, Tabrizi P. Lidocaine 20% patch vs lidocaine 5% gel for topical  anaesthesia  of  oral  mucosa.  Int  J  Paediatr  Dent,18:  452–60, 2008.

7. Yamamura K, Yotsuyanagi T, Okamoto T and Nabeshima T. Pain relief of oral ulcer by dibucaine-film. Pain, 83(3): 625–6, 1999.

8. Stewart  RE,  Barber TK, Troutman  KC  and Wei  SHY.  Pediatric  den-tistry- Scientific foundations and clinical practice. 1st ed. CV Mosby Company, St. Louis, 810–32, 1982.

9. Hawkins  JM,  Moore  PA.  Local  anesthesia:  advances  in  agents  and techniques. Dent Clin N Am, 46: 719–32, 2002.

10. Meechan JG. Intra-oral topical anaesthetics: a review. J Dent, 28: 3–14, 2000.

11. Paschos E, Huth KC, Benz C, Bardschmidt AR, Hickel R. Efficacy of intraoral topical anesthetics in children. J Dent, 34: 398–404, 2006.

12. Ram  D,  Peretz  B.  Reaction  of  children  to  maxillary  infiltration  and mandibular block injections. Pediatr Dent, 23: 343–6, 2001.

13. Von Baeyer CL. Children’s self-reports of pain intensity: Scale selec-tion,  limitations  and  interpretation.  Pain  Res  Management,  11(3): 157–62, 2006.

14. Giddon  DB,  Quadland  M,  Rachwall  PC,  Springer  J  and  Tursky  B. Development of a method for comparing topical anesthetics in differ-ent application and dosage forms. J Oral Ther Pharm, 4: 270–4, 1968. 

15. Peretz B, Efrat J. Dental anxiety among young adolescent patients in Israel. Int J Paediatr Dent, 10: 126–32, 2000.

16. Allin KD, Kotil D, Larzelere RE, Hutfless S, Beiraghi S. Comparison of  a  computerized  anesthesia  device  with  a  traditional  syringe  in preschool children. Pediatr Dent, 24: 315–20, 2002. 

17. Maragakis GM, Musselman RJ and Ho CC. Reaction of 5 and 6 year olds to Dental Injection after Viewing the Needle: pilot study. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 31(1): 28–31, 2006.