Article Data

  • Views 1046
  • Dowloads 143

Original Research

Open Access

Differences in Pain Perception in Children Reporting Joint and Orofacial Muscle Pain

  • Chaves TC1,*,
  • Martins Nagamine H1
  • Mêlo de Sousa L1
  • Siriani de Oliveira A1
  • Hallak Regalo SC1
  • Bevilaqua Grossi D1

1Department of Neurosciences and Behavioral Sciences - Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto - University of São Paulo, CEP: 14049-900 Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.

DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.37.3.013017332p40j65u Vol.37,Issue 3,May 2013 pp.321-328

Published: 01 May 2013

*Corresponding Author(s): Chaves TC E-mail: chavestc@fmrp.usp.br

Abstract

To determine changes in orofacial pain perception in community-based children by assessing the pressure pain threshold (PPT) with an algometer and pain intensity by manual palpation (MP). Methods: A total of 100 children from the community aged 7 to 12 years were assessed. Thirty-eight children reported pain in the orofacial region. Of these children,10 reported joint pain (GJ), 12 reported joint and muscle pain(GJMM), 5 reported muscle pain (GMM), 11 reported pain during mastication(GMAST), and 62 reported no pain. An ANOVA (p<0.05) was used to determine the differences in pain intensity and PPT among groups. Results: Significantly higher pain intensity upon MP was observed for the temporalis muscle in the GJMM, GMAST and GJ groups compared to the remaining groups. The PPT values were significantly lower in the masseter, temporalis muscles, TMJ and thenar region in the GJMM group compared to the other groups. Conclusion: MP more accurately differentiated symptomatic subjects from symptom-free TMD subjects, and PPT values were more sensitive to the discrimination of pain in the orofacial sites assessed. In addition, the changes in perception at a larger number of sites among children reporting mixed pain may suggest the presence of a possible mechanism of central sensitization.

Keywords

Children, Temporomandibular Joint Disorders, Pain Measurement.

Cite and Share

Chaves TC,Martins Nagamine H,Mêlo de Sousa L,Siriani de Oliveira A,Hallak Regalo SC,Bevilaqua Grossi D. Differences in Pain Perception in Children Reporting Joint and Orofacial Muscle Pain. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2013. 37(3);321-328.

References

1. Smith BH, Hopton JL, Chambers WA. Chronic pain in primary care. Fam Pract, 16(5):475-82, 1999.

2. Chambers CT, Giesbrecht K, Craig KD, Bennett SM, Huntsman E. A comparison of faces scales for the measurement of pediatric pain: children’s and parents’ ratings. Pain,83(1):25-35, 1999.

3. Greene CS, Klasser GD, Epstein JB. Revision of the American Association of Dental Research’s Science Information Statement about Temporomandibular Disorders. J Can Dent Assoc, 76:115, 2010.

4. Dworkin SF, LeResche L. Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: review, criteria, examinations and specifications, critique. J Craniomandib Disord, 6: 301-355, 1992.

5. Schiffman EL, Ohrbach R, Truelove EL, Tai F, Anderson GC, Pan W, Gonzalez YM, John MT, Sommers E, List T, Velly AM, Kang W, Look JO. The Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders. V: methods used to establish and validate revised Axis I diagnostic algorithms. J Orofac Pain, 24(1):63-78, 2010.

6. Reid KI, Gracely RH, Dubner RA. The influence of time, facial side, and location on pain-pressure thresholds in chronic myogenous temporomandibular disorder. J Orofac Pain, 8:258-265, 1994.

7. Chaves TC, Nagamine HM, de Sousa LM, de Oliveira AS, Grossi DB. Comparison between the reliability levels of manual palpation and pressure pain threshold in children who reported orofacial pain. Man Ther, 15(5):508-12, 2010.

8. Fischer AA. Pressure algometry over normal muscles. Standard values, validity and reproducibility of pressure threshold. Pain 1987; 30:115-126.

9. Chaves TC, Nagamine HM, Sousa LM, Oliveira AS, Bevilaqua-Grossi D. Intra-and Inter agreement of pressure pain threshold for masticatory structures in children reporting orofacial pain related to temporomandibular disorders and symptom-free children. J Orofac Pain, 21:133-142, 2007.

10. LeResche L, Mancl LA, Drangsholt MT, Huang G, Von Korff M. Predictors of onset of facial pain and temporomandibular disorders in early adolescence. Pain, 129(3):269-78, 2007.

11. Pereira LJ, Pereira-Cenci T, Del Bel Cury AA, Pereira SM, Pereira AC, Ambosano GM, Gavião MB. Risk indicators of temporomandibular disorder incidences in early adolescence. Pediatr Dent,32(4):324-8, 2010.

12. Köhler AA, Helkimo AN, Magnusson T, Hugoson A. Prevalence of symptoms and signs indicative of temporomandibular disorders in children and adolescents. A cross-sectional epidemiological investigation covering two decades. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent,10 1:16-25, 2009.

13. Pereira LJ, Pereira-Cenci T, Pereira SM, Cury AA, Ambrosano GM, Pereira AC, Gavião MB. Psychological factors and the incidence of temporomandibular disorders in early adolescence. Braz Oral Res, 23(2):155-60, 2009.

14. Nilsson IM. Reliability, validity, incidence and impact of temporormandibular pain disorders in adolescents. Swed Dent J Suppl, 183:7-86, 2007.

15. Magnusson T, Egermarki I, Carlsson GE. A prospective investigation over two decades on signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders and associated variables. A final summary. Acta Odontol Scand, 63(2):99-109, 2005.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 1.8 (2023) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top