Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Article Menu
Export Article
More by Authors Links
Article Data
- Views 1003
- Dowloads 180
Original Research
Open AccessComparative Evaluation of Antimicrobial Efficacy of Various Root
Canal Filling Materials Along with Aloevera Used in Primary Teeth:
A Microbiological Study
Comparative Evaluation of Antimicrobial Efficacy of Various Root Canal Filling Materials Along with Aloevera Used in Primary Teeth: A Microbiological Study
1Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital, Wardha (442004), Maharashtra, India.
*Corresponding Author(s): Kriplani R E-mail: Ritika.kriplani@gmail.com
Abstract
this study was conducted to evaluate the antimicrobial effectiveness of 6 root canal filling materials and a negative control agent against 18 strains of bacteria isolated from infected root canals of primary molar teeth using agar diffusion assay. Materials: Aloevera with sterile water, Zinc oxide and Eugenol, Zinc oxide-Eugenol with aloevera, Calcium hydroxide and sterile water, Calcium hydroxide with sterile water and aloevera, Calcium hydroxide and Iodoform (Metapex) and Vaseline (Control). MIC and MBC of aloevera was calculated. Results: All materials except Vaseline showed varied antimicrobial activity against the test bacterias. The zones of inhibition were ranked into 4 inhibition categories based on the proportional distribution of the data. All the 18 bacterial isolates were classified under 2 groups based on Gram positive and Gram negative aerobes. Statistical analysis was carried out to compare the antimicrobial effectiveness between materials tested with each of the bacterial groupings. Conclusion: Aloevera + Sterile Water was found to have superior antimicrobial activity against most of the microorganisms followed by ZOE + Aloevera, calcium hydroxide + Aloevera, ZOE, calcium hydroxide, Metapex in the descending order and Vaseline showed no inhibition.
Keywords
Aloevera, antimicrobial property, root canal, primary teeth
Cite and Share
Kriplani R,Thosar N, Baliga M S, Kulkarni P,Shah N,Yeluri R. Comparative Evaluation of Antimicrobial Efficacy of Various Root Canal Filling Materials Along with Aloevera Used in Primary Teeth: A Microbiological Study. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2013. 37(3);257-262.
References
1. Tronstad L. Recent development in endodontic research. Scand J Dent Res 100: 52- 59, 1992.
2. Goerig AC, Camp JH. Root canal treatment in primary teeth - A review. Pediatr Dent 5: 33-37, 1983.
3. Grindla D, Reynolds T. The aloevera phenomenon - A review of the properties and modern uses modern uses of the leaf parenchyma gel. J Ethnopharmacol 16: 117-51, 1986.
4. Morton JF. Folk uses and commercial exploitation of aloe leaf pulp. Econ. Bot 15: 311-319, 1961.
5. Reynolds T, Dweck AC. Aloevera leaf gel – A review update. J Ethnopharmacol 15: 3-37, 1999.
6. Henry R. An updated review of Aloevera. Cosmetics and Toiletries 94: 42-50, 1979.
7. Chithra P, Sajithlal GB, Chandrakasan G. Influence of Aloevera on the glycosaminoglycans in the matrix of healing dermal wounds in rats. J Ethnopharmacol 59: 179-186, 1998.
8. Chithra P, Sajithlal GB, Chandrakasan G. Influence of aloevera on the healing of dermal wounds in diabetic rats. J Ethnopharmacol 59: 195-201, 1998.
9. A. Gala-García, Teixeira KIR, Mendes LL. Effect of Aloevera on rat pulp tissue. Pharmaceutical Biolog 46: 302–308, 2008.
10. Collee JG, Frazer AG, Marshmuin BP, Simmonson A, Editor. In: Mackie and Macartney’s practical Medical Microbiology. 14th Ed, Churchill Livingstone: New York: 1996.
11. Reddy S, Ramakrishna Y. Evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of various root canal filling materials used in primary teeth - A microbiological study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 31:195–99, 2007.
12. Moller AJR. Microbiological examination of the root canals and periapical tissues of human teeth - Methodological studies. OdontolTidskr 74: 1-380, 1966.
13. Tchaou WS, Turng BF, Minah GE, Coll JA. In vitro inhibition of bacteria from root canals of primary teeth by various dental materials. Pediatr Dent 17: 351-355, 1995.
14. Bauer AW et al. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by standardized single disk method. Am J ClinPatho 45: 493-496, 1966.
15. Crosswhite FS, Crosswhite CD. Aloevera plant symbolism at the threshing floor. Desert plants 6: 43-50, 1984.
16. Morton, JF. Folk uses and commercial exploitation of aloe leaf pulp. Econ Bot 15: 311-319, 1984.
17. Azfal M, Ali RA, Hassan H, Sweedan N, Dhami MSI. Identification of some prostanoids in Aloe vera extracts. PlantaMedica 57: 38-40, 1991.
18. Malterud KE, Farbrot TL, Huse AE. Antioxidant and radical scavenging effects of anthraquinones and anthrones. Pharmacology 47: 77-85, 1993.
19. Cock IE. Antimicrobial activity of Aloe barbadensis miller leaf gel. Inter J Microbio 4: 77-85, 2008.
20. Ramamoorthy L and Tizard IR. Induction of apoptosis in a macrophage cell line RAW. Molecular Pharmacology 53: 415-421, 1998.
21. Tizard I, Busbee D, Maxwell B, Kemp MC. Effects of acemannan, a complex carbohydrate, on wound healing in young and aged rats. Wounds 6: 201-209, 1994.
22. Rodriguez-Bigas M, Cruz NI, Suarez A. 1988. Comparative evaluation of Aloe vera in the management of burn wounds in guinea pigs. Plast Reconstr Surg 81: 386-389, 1988.
23. Seyger MM, Van de Kerkhof PC, Van Vlijmen-Willems IM, De Bakker ES, Zwiers F, De Jong EMGJ. The efficacy of a new topical treatment for psoriasis. Mirak. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venerol 11: 13-18, 1998.
24. Gala-García, Teixeira KRI, Mendes LL, Sobrinho APR, Santos VR, Cortes ME. Effect of Aloe vera on Rat Pulp Tissue. Pharmaceutical Biolog 46: 302–308, 2008.
25. Vinson JA, Al Kharrat H, Andreoli L. Effect of Aloevera preparations on the human bioavailability of vitamins C and E. Phytomedicine 12: 760–765, 2005.
26. Agarry OO, olaleye MT, Bello-Michael CO. Comparative antimicrobial activities of aloevera gel leaf. Afr. J Biotechnol 4: 1413-1414, 2005.
27. George D, Bhat SS, Antony B. Comparative evaluation of the antimicrobial efficacy of aloevera tooth gel and two popular commercial toothpastes - An in vitro study. Gen Dent 57: 238-241, 2009.
28. Habeeb F, Shakir E, Bradbury F Cameron P, Taravati MR, Drummond AJ, Gray AI, Ferro VA. Screening methods used to determine the antimicrobial peoperties of Aloevera inner gel. Methods 42: 315- 320, 2007.
29. Cox ST, Hembree JH and McKnight JP. The bactericidal potential of various endodontic materials for primary teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 45: 947-954, 1978.
30. Grossman LI. Antimicrobial effect of root canal cements. J Endodont 6: 594-597, 1980.
31. Ostavik D. Antibacterial properties of root canal sealer, cements and pastes. Int Endodont J 14:125-133, 1981.
32. Tchaou WS et al. Inhibition of pure cultures of oral bacteria by root canal filing materials. Peadiatr Dent 18: 444-449, 1996.
33. Pabla T, Gulati MS, Mohan U. Evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of various root canal filling materials for primary teeth. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 15: 134-140, 1997.
34. Ninomiya J, Sugawara M, Yamachika K, Nogame K, Yasuda H, Okamoto H. Studies on antimicrobial activity of Vitapex in vitro. Jpn J Conserv Dent 23: 625-630, 1980.
35. Seow WK. The effects of dyadic combinations of endodontic medicaments on microbial growth inhibition. Peadiatr Dent 12: 292-297, 1990.
36. Suresh chandra B, Aren JK. Antimicrobial efficacy of aloevera extract on resistant antimicrobial strains in endodontics. Endodo 13: 113-119, 2006.
37. George D, Bhat SS, Antony B. Comparative evaluation of the antimicrobial efficacy of aloevera tooth gel and two popular commercial toothpastes - An in vitro study. Gen Dent 57: 238-241, 2009.
38. Wu YW, Ouyang J, Xiao XH, Gao WY, Liu Y. Antimicrobial properties and toxicity of anthraquinones by microcalorimetric bioassay. Chinese J Chem 24: 45-50, 2006.
39. Dabai YU, Muhammad S, Aliyu BS. Antibacterial activity of anthraquinone fraction of Vitexdoniana. Pakistan J Biol Sci: 1-3, 2007.
Abstracted / indexed in
Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.
Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.
Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.
JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.
Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.
BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.
Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.
Scopus: CiteScore 1.8 (2023) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.
Submission Turnaround Time
Conferences
Top