Propolis and Commonly Used Intracanal Irrigants. Comparative Evaluation of Inflammatory Potential

The present study evaluated the inflammatory/ irritant potential of propolis in comparison with commonly used intracanal irrigants such as chlorhexidine and calcium hydroxide, with normal saline solution as control using an animal (Wistar rats) model. Method: 2% Evans blue was intravenously injected into the lateral caudal vein. 0.1 ml each of the test solutions was intradermally injected into the experimental sites designed on their shaved backs. The animals were then sacrificed after 1½ and 3 hours respectively. Each piece of skin containing the injected solution was excised, immersed in 4ml formamide and incubated at 45°C for 72 hours. After filtration with glass wool, optical density(OD) was measured using a spectro¬photometer and analyzed statistically. Results: At 620 nm irrespective of time, the mean optical density with Calcium Hydroxide was found to be maximum (0.197±0.095) while that with DMSO Propolis was found to be minimum (0.070±0.016). Both at 90 min and 180 min, the mean optical density with Calcium Hydroxide was found to be maximum. Conclusions: On short term evaluation, maximum inflammation was seen with calcium hydroxide followed by chlorhexidine and DMSO extract of propolis. Minimum inflammation was seen with sterile physiologic saline. With progress of time, maximum inflammation was seen with calcium hydroxide followed by chlorhexidine and DMSO extract of propolis which was non-significant.

propolis, intracanal irrigants, inflammatory potential, optical density

1. Ingle J.I. and Zeldow B.J. An evaluation of mechanical instrumentation and the negative culture in endodontic therapy. J Am Dent Assoc; 57:471, 1958.

2. Bretz W. A., Chiego D. J., Marcuccic M. C., Cunhad I., A. Custo´ diod, L. Schneidera G. Preliminary Report on the Effects of Propolis on Wound Healing in the Dental Pulp. Z. Naturforsch; 53c, 1045-1048, 1998.

3. Öztürk F., Kurt E., Übeyt Ü., Emiro L., Sami S., Sobaci G. Effect of Propolis on Endotoxin-Induced Uveitis in Rabbits. Jpn J Ophthalmol; 43:285–289, 1999.

4. Da Silva F.B., De Almeida J.M., Maria Galvão de Sousa Simone. Natural medicaments in endodontics – a comparative study of the anti-inflammatory action. Braz Oral Res; 18(2):174-9, 2004.

5. Udaka K, Takeuchi Y, Movat HZ. Simple method for quantitation of enhanced vascular permeability. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med; 133:1384-7, 1970.

6. Bernardo C.L.E., Souza I.A.F., Colavitti C., Garcia C. Própolis: cicatrizante e antibiótico natural. Rev Bras Enferm; 43(1/4):101-6, 1990.

7. Azevedo I.B.S., Sampaio R.F., Montes J.C., Contreras R.L.L. Tratamento de escaras de decúbito com própolis. Rev Bras Enferm; 39(2/3) :33-7, 1986.

8. Dobrowolski J.W., Vohora S.B., Sharma K., Shah S. A., Naqvi S.A.H., Dandiya P.C. Antibacterial, antifungal, antiamoebic, antiinflammatory and antipyretic studies on propolis bee products. J Ethnopharmacology 35, 77-82, 1991.

9. Hay K.D., Greig D.E. Propolis allergy: A cause of oral mucositis with ulceration. Oral Surc Oral Med Oral Pathol; 7O:S84-6, 1990.

10. Mirzoeva O.K., Calder P.C. The effect of propolis and its components on eicosanoid production during the inflammatory response. Prostaglandins, Leukotrienes and Essential Fatty Acids; 55(6), 441-449, 1996.

11. Burdock G.A. Review of the Biological Properties and Toxicity of Bee Propolis (Propolis). Food and Chemical Toxicology; 36, 347-363, 1998.

12. Borrellia F., Maffiaa P., Pintoa L., Ianaroa A., Russo A., Capassoa F., Ialentia A. Phytochemical compounds involved in the anti-inflammatory effect of propolis extract. Fitoterapia 73(1), S53–S63, 2002.

13. Tanomaru JM, Leonardo MR, Tanomaru Filho M, Bonetti Filho I, Silva LA. Effect of different irrigation solutions and calcium hydroxide on bacterial LPS ; 36(11):733-9, 2003.

14. Jeansonne M.J., White R.R. A comparison of 2.0% chlorhexidine gluconate and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite as antimicrobial endodontic irrigants. J Endod; 20: 276-8, 1994. 15. White R.R., Hays G.L., Janer L.R. Residual antimicrobial activity after canal irrigation with chlorhexidine. J Endod;23: 229-231, 1997.

16. Leonardo M.R., Lia R.C.C., Esberard R.M., Benatti N.C. Immediate root canal filling: the use of cytophylactic substances and noncytotoxic solutions. J Endod; 10: 1-8, 1984.

17. Loe H, Schiott C.R. The effect of mouth rinses and topical application of chlorhexidine on the development of dental plaque and gingivites in man. J Periodont Res; 5: 79-83, 1970.

18. Southard S.R., Drisko C.L., Killoy W.J., Cobb C.M., Tira D.E. The effect of 2% chlorhexidine digluconate irrigation on clinical parameters and the level of Bacteroides gingivalis in periodontal pockets. J Periodont; 60, 302-309, 1989.

19. Blomlöf L, Lindskog S, Hammarström L. Influence of pulpal treatments on cell and tissue reactions in the marginal periodontium.J Periodontol; 59(9):577-83, 1988.

20. Holland R, Otoboni Filho J.A., Bernabe P.F., de SouzaV, Nery M.J., Dezan Junior E. Effect of root canal filling material and level of surgical injury on periodontal healing in dogs. Endod Dent Traumat; 14, 199-205, 1998.