Article Menu

Export Article

More by Authors Links

Article Data

  • Views 1042
  • Dowloads 173

Original Research

Open Access

Bond Strength to Unground Enamel and Sealing Ability in Pits and Fissures of a New Self-Adhering Flowable Resin Composite

  • Margvelashvili M1,*,
  • Vichi A1
  • Carrabba M1
  • Goracci C1
  • Ferrari M1

1Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Materials of Siena, Tuscan School of Dental Medicine, University of Florence and Siena, Italy.

DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.37.4.q4753m663808652w Vol.37,Issue 4,July 2013 pp.397-402

Published: 01 July 2013

*Corresponding Author(s): Margvelashvili M E-mail: mari_margvel@yahoo.com

PDF (1.59 MB) View Full-text

Abstract

To evaluate the applicability as a sealant of a new self-adhering flowable resin composite (Vertise Flow, Kerr, VF) by assessing shear bond strength (SBS) to unground enamel and microleakage (μLKG) in sealed pits and fissures. Study Design: Marketed sealants to be used in combination with phosphoric acid (Guardian Seal, Kerr, GS) or with a self-etch adhesive (Adper Prompt-L-Pop/Clinpro Sealant, 3M ESPE, CS) were compared to VF. For SBS testing on unground enamel 10 molars per group were used. For μLKG assessment, pits and fissures sealing was performed in 12 molars per group. The sealed teeth were immersed in a 50% weight silver nitrate solution for 24 hours and the extent of interfacial leakage was measured. Between-group differences in SBS were assessed using One-Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey test (p<0.05). μLKG data were analyzed with Kruskall-Wallis ANOVA (p>0.05). Results: SBS of VF was statistically similar to that measured by CS and higher than that of GS. Interfacial leakage was similar in the three groups. Conclusions: The finding of satisfactory bond strength and sealing ability of VF when compared to the marketed sealants encourages the use of VF in pit and fissure sealing.

Keywords

Pit and fissure sealant, All-in-one adhesives, Self-adhering flowable resin composite, Shear bond strength, Microleakage.

Cite and Share

Margvelashvili M,Vichi A,Carrabba M,Goracci C,Ferrari M. Bond Strength to Unground Enamel and Sealing Ability in Pits and Fissures of a New Self-Adhering Flowable Resin Composite . Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2013. 37(4);397-402.

URL:

https://www.jocpd.com/articles/10.17796/jcpd.37.4.q4753m663808652w

References

1. Ahovuo-Saloranta A, Hiiri A, Nordblad A, Makela M, Worthington HV. Pit and fissure sealants for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth of children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD001830, 2008.

2. Simonsen RJ. Pit and fissure sealant: review of the literature. Pediatr Dent 24: 393-414, 2002.

3. Tyas MJ, Anusavice KJ, Frencken JE, Mount GJ. Minimal intervention dentistry--a review. FDI Commission Project 1-97. Int Dent J 50: 1-12, 2000.

4. Handelman SL, Shey Z. Michael Buonocore and the Eastman Dental Center: a historic perspective on sealants. J Dent Res 75: 529-34, 1996.

5. Papacchini F, Goracci C, Sadek FT, Monticelli F, Garcia-Godoy F, Ferrari M. Microtensile bond strength to ground enamel by glass-ionomers, resin-modified glass-ionomers, and resin composites used as pit and fissure sealants. J Dent 33: 459-67, 2005.

6. Simonsen RJ, Neal RC. A review of the clinical application and performance of pit and fissure sealants. Aust Dent J 1: 45-58, 2011.

7. Vaderhobli RM. Advances in dental materials. Dent Clin North Am 55: 619-25, 2011.

8. Irinoda Y, Matsumura Y, Kito H, Nakano T, Toyama T, Nakagaki H, et al. Effect of sealant viscosity on the penetration of resin into etched human enamel. Oper Dent 25: 274-82, 2000.

9. Hitt JC, Feigal RJ. Use of a bonding agent to reduce sealant sensitivity to moisture contamination: an in vitro study. Pediatr Dent 14: 41-6, 1992.

10. Feigal RJ, Quelhas I. Clinical trial of a self-etching adhesive for sealant application: success at 24 months with Prompt L-Pop. Am J Dent 16: 249-51, 2003.

11. Finger WJ, Shao B, Hoffmann M, Kanehira M, Endo T, Komatsu M. Does application of phase-separated self-etching adhesives affect bond strength? J Adhes Dent 9: 169-73, 2007.

12. Torres CP, Balbo P, Gomes-Silva JM, Ramos RP, Palma-Dibb RG, Borsatto MC. Effect of individual or simultaneous curing on sealant bond strength. J Dent Child (Chic) 72: 31-5, 2005.

13. Tulunoglu O, Bodur H, Uctasli M, Alacam A. The effect of bonding agents on the microleakage and bond strength of sealant in primary teeth. J Oral Rehabil 26: 436-41, 1999.

14. Perdigao J, Fundingsland JW, Duarte S, Jr., Lopes M. Microtensile adhesion of sealants to intact enamel. Int J Paediatr Dent 15: 342-8, 2005.

15. Asselin ME, Sitbon Y, Fortin D, Abelardo L, Rompre PH. Bond strength of a sealant to permanent enamel: evaluation of 3 application protocols. Pediatr Dent 31: 323-8, 2009.

16. De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, et al. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res 84: 118-32, 2005.

17. Vaidyanathan TK, Vaidyanathan J. Recent advances in the theory and mechanism of adhesive resin bonding to dentin: a critical review. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 88: 558-78, 2009.

18. Van Landuyt KL, Mine A, De Munck J, Jaecques S, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, et al. Are one-step adhesives easier to use and better performing? Multifactorial assessment of contemporary one-step self-etching adhesives. J Adhes Dent 11: 175-90, 2009.

19. Waggoner WF, Siegal M. Pit and fissure sealant application: updating the technique. J Am Dent Assoc 127: 351-61, quiz 91-2, 1996.

20. Rengo C, Goracci C, Juloski J, Chieffi N, Giovannetti A, Vichi A, et al. Influence of phosphoric acid etching on microleakage of a self-etch adhesive and a self-adhering composite. Aust Dent J 2012.

21. Vichi A, Goracci C, Ferrari M. Clinical study of the self-adhering flowable composite resin Vertise Flow in Class I restorations: six-month follow-up. International Dentistry South Africa 12: 14-24, 2010.

22. Wei YJ, Silikas N, Zhang ZT, Watts DC. Hygroscopic dimensional changes of self-adhering and new resin-matrix composites during water sorption/ desorption cycles. Dent Mater 27: 259-66, 2011.

23. Wei YJ, Silikas N, Zhang ZT, Watts DC. Diffusion and concurrent solubility of self-adhering and new resin-matrix composites during water sorption/desorption cycles. Dent Mater 27: 197-205, 2011.

24. Kidd EA. Microleakage: a review. J Dent 4: 199-206, 1976.

25. Shono Y, Terashita M, Pashley EL, Brewer PD, Pashley DH. Effects of cross-sectional area on resin-enamel tensile bond strength. Dent Mater 13: 290-6, 1997.

26. Going RE. Microleakage around dental restorations: a summarizing review. J Am Dent Assoc 84: 1349-57, 1972.

27. Taylor MJ, Lynch E. Microleakage. J Dent 20: 3-10, 1992.

28. Opdam NJ, Roeters FJ, Feilzer AJ, Verdonschot EH. Marginal integrity and postoperative sensitivity in Class 2 resin composite restorations in vivo. J Dent 26: 555-62, 1998.

29. Davidson CL, Feilzer AJ. Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage stress in polymer-based restoratives. J Dent 25: 435-40, 1997.

30. Asselin ME, Fortin D, Sitbon Y, Rompre PH. Marginal microleakage of a sealant applied to permanent enamel: evaluation of 3 application protocols. Pediatr Dent 30: 29-33, 2008.

31. Gwinett AJ. The ultrastructure of the “prismless” enamel of deciduous teeth. Arch Oral Biol 11: 1109-16, 1966.

32. Meola MT, Papaccio G. A scanning electron microscope study of the effect of etching time and mechanical pre-treatment on the pattern of acid etching on the enamel of primary teeth. Int Dent J 36: 49-53, 1986.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 1.8 (2023) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top