A Novel Distraction Technique for Pain Management during Local Anesthesia Administration in Pediatric Patients

Aim: The aim of this study was to assess the effect of an active and novel distraction technique WITAUL (Writing In The Air Using Leg) on the pain behavior observed and reported by children receiving local anesthesia injections prior to dental treatment. Study design: The study was conducted on 160 children (80 in control and 80 in intervention group) between the ages of 4 - 10 years. During the administration of anesthesia the children in the control group were made to relax by means of deep breathing and those in the intervention group were taught to use the WITAUL distraction technique. the behavior of the children aged 4 - 5 years was noted using the Modified Toddler-Preschooler Post operative Pain Scale (TPPPS) and that of children aged above 6 years was measured using the FACES Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R). Results: The use of WITAUL was found to be statistically significant (p value < 0.0001) compared to the control method in serving as a distraction and hence in managing pain during local anesthesia administration. The mean Modified TPPPS scores (4 - 5 year olds) for the WITAL group was 2.46 ±1.752 and that of the control was 5.64±2.328. The mean FPS-R scores (6 - 10 year olds) for the WITAUL group was 3±1.748 and that of the control group was 6.26±1.858. Conclusion: The WITAUL technique therefore appears to be a simple and effective method of distraction during local anesthesia administration in pediatric patients.

Distraction, Pain control, Local anesthesia, Behavior management

1. Pain terms: a list with definitions and notes on usage. Pain;6:249-252.1979.

2. Versloot J, Craig KD. The communication of pain in paediatric dentistry. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 10(2):61-6, 2009.

3. Ram D, Peretz B. Administering local anaesthesia to paediatric dental patients – current status and prospects for the future. Int J Paediatr Dent. 12(2):80-9, 2002.

4. JG Meechan. Intra-oral topical anesthetics: a review. J of Dent. 28(1):3-14, 2000.

5. Pollack S. Pain control by suggestion. J Oral Med 21:89-95, 1966.

6. Peretz B, Gluck GM. Assessing an active distracting technique for local anesthetic injection in pediatric dental patients: repeated deep breathing and blowing out air. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 24(1):5-8, 1999.

7. JG Meechan, AJ Gowansa, RR Welbury. The use of patient-controlled transcutaneous electronic nerve stimulation (TENS) to decrease the discomfort of regional anaesthesia in dentistry: a randomised controlled clinical trial. J of Dent. 26(5-6):417–420, 1998.

8. DJ Courtney, S Agrawal and PJ Revington. Local anaesthesia: to warm or alter the pH? A survey of current practice. J.R.Coll.Surg.Edinb. 44:167-71, 1999.

9. JG Meechan. Supplementary routes to local anaesthesia. Int Endod J. 35:885-896, 2002.

10. Stefan Lautenbacher, Roger B Fillingim. Pathophysiology of Pain Percep-tion. Springer. 25-27, 2004.

11. Aitken JC, Wilson S, Coury D, Moursi AM. The effect of music distraction on pain, anxiety and behavior in pediatric dental patients. Pediatr Dent. 24(2):114-8, 2002.

12. Frankl SN, Shiere FR, Fogels HR. Should the parent remain with the child in the dental operatory? J Dent Child. 29:150-163, 1962;

13. Doda M, Mukherjee S. Postoperative Analgesia in Children- Compara-tive Study between Caudal Bupivacaine and Bupivacaine plus Tramadol. Indian J Anaesth. 53(4):463-6, 2009.

14. Deborah Tomlinson,Carl L von Baeyer, Jennifer N Stinson, Lillian Sung A Systematic Review of Faces Scales for the Self-report of Pain Intensity in Children. Pediatrics. 126(5):e1168-98, 2010.

15. Luciana Leonetti Correia, Maria Beatriz Martins Linhares. Assessment of the behavior of children in painful situations: literature review. J Pediatr (Rio J). 84(6):477-486, 2008.

16. Aminabadi NA, Farahani RM, Balayi Gajan E. The efficacy of distraction and counterstimulation in the reduction of pain reaction to intraoral injec-tion by pediatric patients. J Contemp Dent Pract. 9(6):33-40, 2008

17. Prabhakar AR, Marwah N, Raju OS. A comparison between audio and audiovisual distraction techniques in managing anxious pediatric dental patients. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 25(4):177-82, 2007.