Article Data

  • Views 1181
  • Dowloads 217

Original Research

Open Access

Pattern of Parental Acceptance of Management Techniques Used in Pediatric Dentistry

  • Peretz B1,*,
  • Kharouba J1
  • Blumer S1

1Department of Paediatric Dentistry, The Maurice and Gabriela Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.38.1.8264110prh577428 Vol.38,Issue 1,January 2014 pp.27-30

Published: 01 January 2014

*Corresponding Author(s): Peretz B E-mail: bperetz@post.tau.ac.il

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate parents' acceptance of management techniques in Israeli pediatric dental clinics. Study Design: Ninety parents who accompanied their children to three pediatric dental clinics provided information on selected parameters including their attitudes about management techniques. Results: 68.9% of the parents preferred to stay in the treatment room. The most accepted technique was positive reinforcement (81.1%) followed by tell-show-do (TSD) (76.7%, with younger parents more accepting than older, p = 0.049). The least accepted techniques were restraint (1.1%) and voice control (7.8%, especially by parents with the highest dental anxiety, p = 0.002). Sedation was unacceptable by 15.6% of the parents: those with the lowest dental anxiety agreed to sedation significantly more than those with greater dental anxiety (p = 0.031). Conclusions: Parents preferred more positive approaches and management techniques that involve demonstrations geared for the child's level of understanding. Restraint and voice control were more strongly rejected than sedation.

Keywords

Management, parents, acceptance, children dental anxiety

Cite and Share

Peretz B,Kharouba J,Blumer S. Pattern of Parental Acceptance of Management Techniques Used in Pediatric Dentistry. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2014. 38(1);27-30.

References

1. Addelston H K. Child patient training. Fort Rev Chic Dent Soc; 38:37, 27- 29. 1959.

2. Chambers D W. Managing the anxieties of young dental patients. J Dent Child; 27: 363-374. 1970-

3. Wright G Z. Behavior Management in Dentistry for Children. Philadelphia, WB Saunders Co, 1975.

4. Fields H W, Pinkham J. Videotape modeling of the child dental patient. J Dent Res; 55: 958-963. 1976.

5. Kelly J R. The use of restraints in pedodontics. J Pedod; 1: 57-68. 1976.

6. Fields H W, Machen J B, Chambers W L, Pfefferle J C. Measuring selected disruptive behavior of the 36- to 60-month-old dental patient, II: Quantifi-cation of observed behavior. Pediatr Dent; 3: 257-261. 1981.

7. Murphy M G, Fields H W Jr, Machen J B. Parental acceptance of pediatric dentistry behavior management technique. Pediatr Dent; 6: 193-198. 1984.

8. Peretz B, Zadik D. Attitudes of parents toward their presence in the treat-ment room during dental treatment to their children. J Clin Pediatr Dent; 23: 27-30. 1998.

9. Fields H W Jr., Machen J B, Murphy M G. Acceptability of various behavior management techniques relative to types of dental treatment. Pediatr Dent; 6: 199-203. 1984.

10. Choate B B, Seale N S, Parker W A, Wilson C F G. Current trends in behavior management techniques as they relate to new standards concerning informed consent. Pediatr Dent; 12: 83-86. 1990.

11. Hagan P P, Hagan J P, Fields H W Jr, Machen J B. The legal status of informed consent for behavior management techniques in pediatric dentistry. Pediatr Dent 1984; 6: 204-208.

12. Pinkham J R. An analysis of the phenomenon of increased parental partic-ipation during the child’s dental experience. J Dent Child; 58: 458-463. 1991.

13. Wright G Z, Stigers J I. Nonpharmacologic management of children’s behaviors. In Dean J A, Avery D R, McDonald R E 9eds). Dentistry for the Child and Adolescent, 9th ed. pp 27-49. Maryland Heights, MI: Mosby Elsevier; 2011.

14. Klein A. Physical restraint, informed consent and the child patient. J Dent Child; 55: 121-122. 1987.

15. Lawrence S M, McTigue D J, Wilson S, Odom J G, Waggoner W F, Fields H W Jr. Parental attitudes toward behavior management techniques used in pediatric dentistry. Pediatr Dent; 13: 151-155. 1991.

16. Havelka C, McTigue D, Wilson S, Odom J. The influence of social status and prior explanation on parental attitudes toward behavior management techniques. Pediatr Dent; 14: 376-381. 1992.

17. Wilson S, Antalis D, McTigue D J. Group effect on parental rating of acceptability of behavioral management techniques used in pediatric dentistry. Pediatr Dent; 13: 200-203. 1991.

18. Peretz B, Zadik D. Parents’ attitudes toward management techniques to their children during dental treatment. Pediatr Dent; 21: 201-204. 1999.

19. Corah N L. Development of a dental anxiety scale. J Dent Res 1969; 48: 596.

20. Peretz B, Zadik D. Dental anxiety of parents in an Israeli kibbutz popula-tion. Int J Paediatr Dent; 4: 87-92. 1994.

21. Peretz B, Moshonov J. Dental anxiety among patients undergoing endodontic treatment. J Endod; 24: 435-437. 1998.

22. Geboy M J, Muzzio T C, Stark A M: Communication and Behavior Management in Dentistry. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins;1985. pp. 30- 31, 45-55, 65.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 1.8 (2023) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top