Article Data

  • Views 782
  • Dowloads 174

Original Research

Open Access

Salivary pH Levels and Caries among Siblings and Parents within Families

  • Basch Y1
  • Peretz B2,*,

1Maurice and Gabriela School of Dental Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel

2Department of Pediatric Dentistry. Maurice and Gabriela School of Dental Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel

DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.38.2.90764500t2703188 Vol.38,Issue 2,March 2014 pp.129-132

Published: 01 March 2014

*Corresponding Author(s): Peretz B E-mail: bperetz@post.tau.ac.il

Abstract

Background: High level of caries activity is related to organisms in the dental plaque with high acidogenesis capacity. Aim: To test salivary pH in children of the same family and compare it with their caries status. To compare pH levels between children and their parents. To examine the relationship between pH and caries status among children of the same family and their parents. Study design: We examined 123 children and adolescents aged 3-18, (73 boys and 50 girls) and 33 adults, (12 men and 21 women), parents of these children. Caries status was examined clinically, using DMF index. Salivary pH measurements were made by a digital pH meter. Results: Among adults, increase in patient age led to increased DMF (p = 0.005). The higher the pH, the lower the DMF (p = 0.037). Among men, DMF was lower by 3 compared to women (p = 0.049). Children's pH correlated with the parents’ (p = 0.004). Children's DMF correlated to their pH (p = 0.001). Children's pH was the best predictor of their DMF (R2 = 0.309, p = 0.001). Conclusions: Among children, the higher the pH, the lower the DMFT. Children's pH was the best predictor of their DMF.

Keywords

Caries, children, salivary pH

Cite and Share

Basch Y,Peretz B. Salivary pH Levels and Caries among Siblings and Parents within Families. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2014. 38(2);129-132.

References

1. Gopinath VK, Arzreanne AR. Saliva as a diagnostic tool for assessment of dental caries. Arch Orofac Sci; 1:57-59. 2006.

2. Lingstrom P, van Ruyven FOJ, van Houte J, Kent R. The pH of dental plaque in its relation to early enamel caries and dental plaque flora in humans. J Dent Res; 79: 770-777. 2000.

3. Tinanoff N, Kanellis MJ, Vargas CM. Current understanding of the epidemiology, mechanisms, and prevention of dental caries in preschool children. Pediatr Dent; 24: 543-551. 2002.

4. Davidovich E, Aframian DJ, Shapira J, Peretz B. A comparison of the sialochemistry , oral pH, and oral health status of Down syndrome children to healthy children. Int J Paediatr Dent; 20: 235-241. 2010.

5. Zero DT, Fontana M, Martinez-Mier EA, Ferreira-Zandona A, Ando M, Gonzalez-Cabezas C, Bayne S .The biology, prevention, diagnosis and treatment of dental caries. J Am Dent Assoc; 140: 25s-34s. 2009.

6. Fenoll-Palomares C, Munoz-Montagud JV, Sanchiz V, Herreros B, Hernandez V, Minguez M, Benages A.unstimulated salivary flow rate, pHand buffer capacity of saliva in healthy volunteers . Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 96: 773-783. 2004.

7. Ship JA. Diagnosing, managing, and preventing salivary gland disorders. Oral Dis; 8: 77–89. 2002.

8. Aframian DJ, Davidowitz T, Benoliel R. The distribution of oral mucosal pH values in healthy saliva secretors. Oral Dis; 12: 420–423. 2006.

9. Conry JP, Messer LB, Boraas JC, Aeppli DP, Bouchard TJ Jr. Dental caries and treatment characteristics in human twins reared apart. Arch Oral Biol; 38: 937-943. 1993.

10. Shuler CF. Inherited risk for susceptibility to dental caries. J Dent Educ; 65: 1038-1045. 2001.

11. Goodman HO, Luke JE, Rosen S, Hackel E. Heritability in dental caries, certain oral microflora and salivary components. Am J Hum Genet; 11: 263-273. 1959.

12. Preethi BP, Pyati A, Dodawad R. Evaluation of flow rate, ph, buffering capacity, calcium, total protein and total antioxidant levels of saliva in caries free and caries active children- An in vivo study. Biomed Res; 21:2 89-294. 2010.

13. Melvin J. Saliva and dental diseases. Curr Opin Dent; 1: 795–801. 1991.

14. Antunes JLF, Junqueira SR, Frazao P, Bispo CM, Pegoretti T, Narvai PC. City-level gender differentials in the prevalence of dental carries and restorative dental treatment. Health Place; 9: 231-239. 2003.

15. Vehkalahtu MM, Paunio IK. Occurrence of root caries in relation to dental health behavior. J Dent Res; 67: 911-914. 1988.

16. Stabholz A , Mann J, Sela M , Schurr D , Steinberg D , Dori S , Shapira J. Caries experience, periodontal treatment needs, salivary pH, and streptococcus mutans counts in a preadolescent Down syndrome population. Spec Care Dentist 1991; 11: 203-208.

17. Zadik D, Zusman SP, Kelman AM. Caries prevalence in 5 and 12 year-old children in Israel. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 20: 54–55. 1992.

18. Fejerskov, E; Kidd, Dental Caries: The Disease and Its Clinical Management, 2nd Edition. Wiley-Blackwell 2008

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 1.8 (2023) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top