Article Data

  • Views 1154
  • Dowloads 191

Original Research

Open Access

Buccal Midazolam Spray as an Alternative to Intranasal Route for Conscious Sedation in Pediatric Dentistry

  • Chopra R1,*,
  • Mittal M1
  • Bansal K1
  • Chaudhuri P1

1Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry. SGT Dental College, Hospital and Research Institute, Budhera-122505, Gurgaon, India

DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.38.2.n055763721297702 Vol.38,Issue 2,March 2014 pp.171-174

Published: 01 March 2014

*Corresponding Author(s): Chopra R E-mail: drradhikachopra@gmail.com

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the acceptance of midazolam spray through buccal route as compared to intranasal route and compare the efficacy of the drug through both the routes. Study Design: 30 patients aged 2-8 years with Grade I or II Frankl's Behaviour Rating Scale were selected who required similar treatment under local anesthesia on two teeth. Midazolam spray was administered randomly through buccal or intranasal routes for the two appointments. Scoring was done for the acceptance of drug and Houpt's score was recorded for the behaviour of patients during the treatment. Results: Acceptance of drug through buccal route was significantly better than the intranasal route (p<0.05) but no statistically significant difference was found in the behaviour scores for the two routes of administration (p≯0.05). Conclusion: Midazolam spray can be effectively used through the buccal mucosa in children who give poor compliance with the intranasal administration.

Keywords

Buccal midazolam, Conscious sedation, Pediatric dentistry

Cite and Share

Chopra R,Mittal M,Bansal K,Chaudhuri P. Buccal Midazolam Spray as an Alternative to Intranasal Route for Conscious Sedation in Pediatric Dentistry. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2014. 38(2);171-174.

References

1. Wilson KE, Welbury RR, Girdler NM. A study of the effectiveness of oral midazolam sedation for orthodontic extraction of permanent teeth in children: a prospective, randomised, controlled, crossover trial. Br Dent J, 192: 457-62, 2002.

2. Primosch RE, Guelmann M. Comparison of drops versus spray administration of intranasal midazolam in two and three-year-old children for dental sedation. Pediatr Dent, 27(5): 401-8, 2005.

3. Kupietzky A, Houpt MI. Midazolam: a review of its use for conscious sedation of children. Pediatr Dent, 15(4): 237-241, 1993.

4. Wilson KE, Welbury RR, Girdler NM. Comparison of transmucosal midazolam with inhalation sedation for dental extractions in children. A randomized, cross-over, clinical trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 51: 1062–1067, 2007.

5. al-Rakaf H, Bello LL, Turkustani A, Adenubi JO. Intra-nasal midazolam in conscious sedation of young paediatric dental patients. Int J Paediatr Dent, 11(1): 33-40, 2001.

6. Mazaheri R, Eshghi A, Bashardoost N, Kavyani N. Assessment of intranasal midazolam administration with a dose of 0.5 mg/ Kg in behavior management of uncooperative children. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 32(2): 95–100, 2007.

7. Lane RD, Schunk JE. Atomized intranasal midazolam use for minor procedures in the pediatric emergency department. Pediatric Emergency Care, 24(5): 300-303, 2008.

8. Dallman JA, Ignelzi Jr. MA, Briskie DM. Comparing the safety, efficacy and recovery of intranasal midazolam vs. oral chloral hydrate and promethazine. Pediatr Dent, 23(5): 424-30, 2001.

9. Griffith N, Howel S, Mason DG. Intranasal midazolam for premedication of children undergoing day-case anesthesia: comparison of two delivery systems with assessment of intra-observer variability. Br J Anaes, 81: 865-69, 1998.

10. Geldner G, Hubmann M, Knoll R, Jacobi K. Comparison between three transmucosal routes of administration of midazolam in children. Pediatr Anesth, 7(2): 103-109, 1997.

11. Ljungman G, Kreuger A, Andreasson S, Gordh T, Sorensen S. Midazolam nasal spray reduces procedural anxiety in children. Pediatrics, 105(1): 73-78, 2000.

12. Karl HW, Rosenberger JL, Larach MG, Ruffle JM. Transmucosal administration of midazolam for premedication of pediatric patients- comparison of the nasal and sublingual routes. Anesthesiology, 78(5):885-91, 1993.

13. Shojaei AH. Buccal mucosa as a route for systemic drug delivery: a review. J Pharm Pharm Sci, 1(1):15-30,1998.

14. Haas DA, Nenniger SA, Yacobi R, Magathan JG, Grad HA, Copp PE, Charendoff MD. A Pilot Study of the Efficacy of Oral Midazolam for Sedation in Pediatric Dental Patients. Anesth Prog, 43:1-8, 1996.

15. Houpt MI, Kupietzky A, Tofsky NS, Koenigsberg SR. Effects of nitrous oxide on diazepam sedation of young children. Pediatr Dent, 18(3):236-41, 1996.

16. Schwagmeier R, Alincic S, Striebel HW. Midazolam pharmacokinetics 46(3): 203-206, 1998.

17. Klein EJ, Brown JC, Kobayashi A, Osincup D, Seidel K. A randomized clinical trial comparing oral, aerosolized intranasal, and aerosolized buccal midazolam. Ann Emerg Med. 2011 Jun 18. [Epub ahead of print]

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 1.8 (2023) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top