Electromyographic Muscular Activity Improvement in Class II Patients Treated with the Pre-Orthodontic Trainer

A study was designed to determine changes in the amplitude of the EMG muscular activity of the Masseter and Temporalis muscles at clench in children with a Class II, division 1 malocclusion treated with the pre-orthodontic Trainer functional appliance, for 12 months. Study Design: 36 Class II, division 1 malocclusion patients (mean age 7.6 ± 1.3 years) composed the treated group and wore the functional appliance; 22 children with a similar age and malocclusion composed the untreated controls; and, 20 children with no dental malocclusion participated as normal controls. Electromyographic (EMG) muscular activity of the Temporalis and Masseter muscles were recorded before and after treatment. Results: Subjects in the treated group reported a bilateral significant increase in the muscular electrical activity in the both tested muscles (p < 0.001). After treatment, they recorded values similar to those measured in normal controls, whereas the untreated controls remained on lower values. Conclusion: These results confirm that treatment with the pre-orthodontic Trainer functional appliance significantly increases the EMG muscular activity in the Temporalis and Masseter muscles at clench in patients with Class II, division 1 malocclusion.

Class II, malocclusion, electromyography, children

1. Millett D, Cunningham S, O’Brien K, Benson P, Williams A, de Oliveira C. Orthodontic treatment for deep bite and retroclined upper front teeth in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 18: CD005972. 2006.

2. Ghislanzoni L, Toll D, Defraia E, Baccetti T, Franchi L. Treatment and posttreatment outcomes induced by the Mandibular Advancement Repositioning Appliance; a controlled clinical study. Angle Orthod; 81: 684-691. 2011

3. Ibitayo A, Pangrazio-Kulbersh V, Berger J, Bayirli B. Dentoskeletal effects of functional appliances vs bimaxillary surgery in hyperdivergent Class II patients. Angle Orthod; 81: 304-311. 2011

4. Cozza P, Baccetti T, Franchi L, De Toffol L, McNamara JJ. Mandibular changes produced by functional appliances in Class II malocclusion: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 129: 599.e591-512. 2006

5. Marsico E, Gatto E, Burrascano M, Matarese G, Cordasco G. Effectiveness of orthodontic treatment with functional appliances on mandibular growth in the short term. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 139: 24-36. 2011

6. Ferretti J, Cointry G, Capozza R, Frost H. Bone mass, bone strength, muscle-bone interactions, osteopenias and osteoporoses. Mech Ageing Dev; 124: 269-279. 2003

7. Frost H. A 2003 update of bone physiology and Wolff’s Law for clinicians. Angle Orthod; 74: 3-15. 2004

8. Usumez S, Uysal T, Sari Z, Basciftci F, Karaman A, Guray E. The effects of early preorthodontic trainer treatment on Class II, division 1 patients. Angle Orthod; 74: 605-609. 2004

9. Ramirez-Yañez G, Sidlauskas A, Junior E, J F. Dimensional changes in dental arches after treatment with a prefabricated functional appliance. J Clin Pediatr Dent; 31: 279-283. 2007

10. Uysal T, Yagci A, Kara S, Okkesim S. Influence of pre-orthodontic trainer treatment on the perioral and masticatory muscles in patients with Class II division 1 malocclusion. Eur J Orthod; 34: 96-101. 2012

11. Yagci A, Uysal T, Kara S, Okkesim S. The effects of myofunctional appliance treatment on the perioral and masticatory muscles in Class II, Division 1 patients. World J Orthod; 11: 117-122. 2010

12. Guelph Uo. Biology for biological engineering. http://www.soe.uoguelph. ca/webfiles/mleuniss/Biomechanics/EMG.html. Accessed November 6, 2012.

13. Ferrario V, Sforza C. Coordinated electromyographic activity of the human masseter and temporalis anterior muscles during mastication. Eur J Oral Sci; 104: 511-517. 1996

14. Karkazis H, Kossioni A. Re-examination of the surface EMG activity of the masseter muscle in young adults during chewing of two test foods. J Oral Rehabil; 24: 216-223. 1997

15. Yoshikawa T, Mori S, Santiesteban A, et al. The effects of muscle fatigue on bone strain. J Exp Biol; 188: 217-233. 1994

16. Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JJ, Tollaro I. Early dentofacial features of Class II malocclusion: a longitudinal study from the deciduous through the mixed dentition. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 111: 502-509. 1997

17. Zupancic S, Pohar M, Farcnik F, Ovsenik M. Overjet as a predictor of sagittal skeletal relationships. Eur J Orthod; 30: 269-273. 2008

18. Moss M. The functional matrix hypothesis revisited. 2. The role of an osseous connected cellular network. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 112: 221-226. 1997

19. Moss M. The functional matrix hypothesis revisited. 1. The role of mechanotransduction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop;112(1):8-11. 1997

20. Turner C, Forwood M, Otter M. Mechanotransduction in bone: do bone cells act as sensors of fluid flow? FASEB J; 8: 875-878. 1994

21. de Jong W, Korfage J, Langenbach G. The role of masticatory muscles in the continuous loading of the mandible. J Anat; 218: 625-636. 2011

22. Langenbach G. The physiology and ontogeny of daily oral behaviors. Integr Comp Biol; 51: 289-296. 2011

23. Burr D, Schaffler M, Yang K, et al. The effects of altered strain environments on bone tissue kinetics. Bone; 10: 215-221. 1989

24. Frost H. Mechanical determinants of bone modeling. Metab Bone Dis Relat Res; 4: 217-229. 1982

25. Xiong H, Rabie A, Hagg U. Neovascularization and mandibular condylar bone remodeling in adult rats under mechanical strain. Front Biosci; 10: 74-82. 2005

26. Eriksen E, Mosekilde L, Melsen F. Trabecular bone remodeling and bone balance in hyperthyroidism. Bone; 6: 421-428. 1985

27. Schoenau E, Frost H. The “muscle-bone unit” in children and adolescents. Calcif Tissue Int; 70: 405-407. 2002