Article Data

  • Views 511
  • Dowloads 165

Original Research

Open Access

Mandibular response after rapid maxillary expansion in mixed dentition children with different vertical growth patterns: a retrospective study

  • Gang Yang1,2
  • Xianhua Xiang2,3
  • Xianqin Tong1,2
  • Yuanyuan Li2,3,*,
  • Yuehua Liu1,3,*,

1Department of Orthodontics, Shanghai Stomatological Hospital & School of Stomatology, Fudan University, 200001 Shanghai, China

2Shanghai Key Laboratory of Craniomaxillofacial Development and Diseases, Fudan University, 200001 Shanghai, China

3Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Shanghai Stomatological Hospital & School of Stomatology, Fudan University, 200001 Shanghai, China

DOI: 10.22514/jocpd.2024.105 Vol.48,Issue 5,September 2024 pp.69-78

Submitted: 10 November 2023 Accepted: 20 December 2023

Published: 03 September 2024

*Corresponding Author(s): Yuanyuan Li E-mail: li_yuanyuan0650@fudan.edu.cn
*Corresponding Author(s): Yuehua Liu E-mail: liuyuehua@fudan.edu.cn

Abstract

This study evaluated the mandibular development induced by rapid maxillary expansion (RME) therapy in mixed dentition patients with different vertical growth patterns through long-term observation. The research utilized a retrospective design that included two cohorts: a control group consisting of pediatric subjects with individualized malocclusions, and an experimental group received RME therapy. A total of 60 subjects were included; 37 in the RME group (17 males and 20 females) and 23 in the control group (13 males and 10 females). Based on mandibular plane angles, 19 pertinent cephalometric variables were quantified with Dolphin Imaging software, and participants were subclassified into high-angle and normal-angle subgroups. Changes in the groups during the observation period were statistically analyzed with a t-test. Compared to the control group, both sagittal parameters tended to decrease after treatment in the RME group (p < 0.05), and none of the vertical correlations were statistically different (p > 0.05). Within the normal-angle experimental subgroup, sagittal parameters markedly decreased when contrasted with their normal-angle control group (p < 0.05). Notably, a substantive decrease in overjet was solely observable in the sagittal dimension among the high-angle expansion subgroup when compared to the high-angle control subgroup (p < 0.05). In the vertical dimension, neither the normal-angle nor high-angle subgroups exhibited any statistically significant differences from their respective control cohorts (p > 0.05). Based on long-term observation, RME therapy promotes mandible sagittal growth of the mandible in subjects with normal-angle vertical growth patterns. A similar tendency was not observed in subjects with high-angle vertical growth patterns. In addition, the mandibular plane angle did not increase after RME in children with high-angles.


Keywords

Rapid maxillary expansion; Vertical growthpatterns; Mandibular response


Cite and Share

Gang Yang,Xianhua Xiang,Xianqin Tong,Yuanyuan Li,Yuehua Liu. Mandibular response after rapid maxillary expansion in mixed dentition children with different vertical growth patterns: a retrospective study. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2024. 48(5);69-78.

References

[1] Franchi L, Baccetti T. Transverse maxillary deficiency in Class II and Class III malocclusions: a cephalometric and morphometric study on postero-anterior films. Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research. 2005; 8: 21–28.

[2] Mehta S, Wang D, Upadhyay M, Vich ML, Yadav S. Long-term effects on alveolar bone with bone-anchored and tooth-anchored rapid palatal expansion. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2022; 161: 519–528.

[3] McNamara JA Jr. Early intervention in the transverse dimension: is it worth the effort? American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2002; 121: 572–574.

[4] Lima Filho RM, de Oliveira Ruellas AC. Mandibular behavior with slow and rapid maxillary expansion in skeletal Class II patients: a long-term study. The Angle Orthodontist. 2007; 77: 625–631.

[5] Paoloni V, Lione R, Farisco F, Halazonetis DJ, Franchi L, Cozza P. Morphometric covariation between palatal shape and skeletal pattern in Class II growing subjects. European Journal of Orthodontics. 2017; 39: 371–376.

[6] Zhang Y, Yang J, Li X. Assessment of early dental arch growth modification with removable maxillary expansion by cone-beam computed tomography and lateral cephalometric radiographs: a retrospective study. BMC Oral Health. 2023; 23: 727.

[7] McNamara JA Jr. Components of class II malocclusion in children 8–10 years of age. The Angle Orthodontist. 1981; 51: 177–202.

[8] Caprioglio A, Bergamini C, Franchi L, Vercellini N, Zecca PA, Nucera R, et al. Prediction of Class II improvement after rapid maxillary expansion in early mixed dentition. Progress in Orthodontics. 2017; 18: 9.

[9] Kotarska M, Kucukkeles N, Lis J, Kawala B, Rumin K, Sarul M. Changes in the mandible following rapid maxillary expansion in children with Class II malocclusion: a systematic review. Diagnostics. 2022; 12: 1688.

[10] Lin JH, Wang S, Abdullah UA, Le AD, Chung CH, Li C. Sagittal and vertical changes of the maxilla after surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2023; 12: 3488.

[11] Garib DG, Henriques JC, Carvalho PE, Gomes SC. Longitudinal effects of rapid maxillary expansion. The Angle Orthodontist. 2007; 77: 442–448.

[12] Lineberger MW, McNamara JA, Baccetti T, Herberger T, Franchi L. Effects of rapid maxillary expansion in hyperdivergent patients. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2012; 142: 60–69.

[13] Feres MF, Raza H, Alhadlaq A, El-Bialy T. Rapid maxillary expansion effects in Class II malocclusion: a systematic review. The Angle Orthodontist. 2015; 85: 1070–1079.

[14] Steiner CC. Importance of cephalometry in orthodontic treatment. Inf Orthod Kieferorthop. 1969; 1: 3–12 passim.

[15] Ricketts RM. Perspectives in the clinical application of cephalometrics. The first fifty years. The Angle Orthodontist. 1981; 51: 115–150.

[16] McNamara JA Jr. A method of cephalometric evaluation. American Journal of Orthodontics. 1984; 86: 449–469.

[17] Jarabak JR, Kamms M. Mandibular measurements. Journal of Dental Research. 1947; 26: 452.

[18] Zhou Y, Long H, Ye N, Xue J, Yang X, Liao L, et al. The effectiveness of non-surgical maxillary expansion: a meta-analysis. European Journal of Orthodontics. 2014; 36: 233–242.

[19] Lione R, Brunelli V, Franchi L, Pavoni C, Quiroga Souki B, Cozza P. Mandibular response after rapid maxillary expansion in class II growing patients: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Progress in Orthodontics. 2017; 18: 36.

[20] Yi L, Jeon HH, Li C, Boucher N, Chung CH. Sagittal and vertical growth of the maxillo-mandibular complex in untreated children: a longitudinal study on lateral cephalograms derived from cone beam computed tomography. Sensors. 2021; 21: 8484.

[21] Paddenberg E, Proff P, Kirschneck C. Floating norms for individualising the ANB angle and the WITS appraisal in orthodontic cephalometric analysis based on guiding variables. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics. 2023; 84: 10–18.

[22] Luca L, Francesca C, Daniela G, Alfredo SG, Giuseppe S. Cephalometric analysis of dental and skeletal effects of Carriere Motion 3D appliance for Class II malocclusion. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2022; 161: 659–665.

[23] Bastiani C, Bellini-Pereira SA, Aliaga-Del Castillo A, Chiqueto K, Castanha Henriques JF, Janson G. Twin-block and mandibular anterior repositioning appliances effects in Class II malocclusion correction. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2023; 163: 181–190.

[24] Guest SS, McNamara JA Jr, Baccetti T, Franchi L. Improving Class II malocclusion as a side-effect of rapid maxillary expansion: a prospective clinical study. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2010; 138: 582–591.

[25] Farronato G, Giannini L, Galbiati G, Maspero C. Sagittal and vertical effects of rapid maxillary expansion in Class I, II, and III occlusions. The Angle Orthodontist. 2011; 81: 298–303.

[26] Volk T, Sadowsky C, BeGole EA, Boice P. Rapid palatal expansion for spontaneous Class II correction. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2010; 137: 310–315.

[27] Arat FE, Arat ZM, Tompson B, Tanju S, Erden I. Muscular and condylar response to rapid maxillary expansion. Part 2: magnetic resonance imaging study of the temporomandibular joint. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2008; 133: 823–829.

[28] Rozzi M, Alesi G, Mucedero M, Cozza P. Dentoskeletal effects of rapid maxillary expander therapy in early mixed dentition patients with different vertical growing patterns without posterior crossbite: a retrospective study. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2023; 163: 319–327.

[29] Tarraf NE, Dalci O, Dalci K, Altug AT, Darendeliler MA. A retrospective comparison of two protocols for correction of skeletal Class III malocclusion in prepubertal children: hybrid hyrax expander with mandibular miniplates and rapid maxillary expansion with face mask. Progress in Orthodontics. 2023; 24: 3.

[30] Chang JY, McNamara JA Jr, Herberger TA. A longitudinal study of skeletal side effects induced by rapid maxillary expansion. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 1997; 112: 330–337.

[31] Mehta S, Vishwanath M, Patel A, Vich ML, Allareddy V, Yadav S. Long-term evaluation of soft-tissue changes after miniscrew-assisted and conventional rapid palatal expansion using voxel-based superimposition of cone-beam computed tomography scans. To be published in American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2023. [Preprint].

[32] Aras I, Olmez S, Akay MC, Gunbay T, Aras A. The effects of maxillary expansion on the soft tissue facial profile. Journal of Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry. 2017; 51: 1–10.

[33] Altındiş S, Toy E, Başçiftçi FA. Effects of different rapid maxillary expansion appliances on facial soft tissues using three-dimensional imaging. The Angle Orthodontist. 2016; 86: 590–598.

[34] Monaco A, Cattaneo R, Spadaro A, Marzo G. Neuromuscular diagnosis in orthodontics: effects of TENS on the sagittal maxillo-mandibular relationship. European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2008; 9: 163–169.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 1.8 (2023) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top