Cyclic fatigue resistance of two pediatric rotary files manufactured with different heat treatments: an in-vitro study

Nickel-titanium (NiTi) instruments offer many advantages during endodontic instrumen-tation; however, the fracture risk within the canal remains a concern. Manufacturers continuously develop and introduce instruments to the market with supposedly enhanced cyclic fatigue resistance and increased flexibility, achieved through different proprietary manufacturing processes, the details of which have not been made public. In recent years, two rotary systems specially designed for deciduous teeth have been commercially available, but information about their performance is lacking. This investigation aimed to identify which manufacturing process provides better cyclic fatigue resistance: the AF-H Wire technology used in the AF baby rotary files (AF-f) or the CM-Wire technology used in the i3 Gold deciduous teeth rotary files (i3G-f). Forty rotary International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 25/04 files were tested in artificial canals with a standard geometry of 60◦ angle and 2.5 mm radius until fracture. The number of cycles to fracture was calculated, and the length of the fragments was measured. A scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used to examine the fracture surfaces and fragments. Energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) was used to determine the percentage weight of NiTi in each file. The statistical analysis (Mann-Whitney test) showed that the cyclic fatigue resistance of the AF-f was significantly higher (p < 0.0001) than that of the i3G-f. Additionally, there was a significant difference (p = 0.0419) in the length of the fractured fragments. All instruments showed one or more types of manufacturing defects and presented similar NiTi percentages by weight. The manufacturing process is critical to cyclic fatigue resistance, and there seems to be responsible for the difference in cyclic fatigue resistance between these similar instruments.

Cyclic fatigue; Nickel-Titanium; Pediatric rotary files; Deciduous teeth; Pulpectomy

[1] Pitts NB, Zero DT, Marsh PD, Ekstrand K, Weintraub JA, Ramos-Gomez F, et al. Dental caries. Nature Reviews Disease Primers. 2017; 3: 17030.

[2] Nadelman P, Bedran N, Magno MB, Masterson D, de Castro ACR, Maia LC. Premature loss of primary anterior teeth and its consequences to primary dental arch and speech pattern: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2020; 30: 687–712.

[3] Gable TO, Kummer AW, Lee L, Creaghead NA, Moore LJ. Premature loss of the maxillary primary incisors: effect on speech production. Journal of Dentistry for Children. 1995; 62: 173–179.

[4] Faca-García M, de Nova-García SQ. The diastemas in primary dentition: the relationship to the tooth size and the dental arches dimensions. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2001; 26: 65–69.

[5] Brothwell DJ. Guidelines on the use of space maintainers following premature loss of primary teeth. Journal Canadian Dental Association. 1997; 63: 753–757.

[6] Santos AGC, Machado CV, Telles PDS, Rocha MCBS. Early loss of deciduous molars in children assisted by the School of Dentistry of the University of Bahia. Scientific-Clinical odontology. 2013; 12: 189–193.

[7] Siqueira JF, Rôças IN, Ricucci D. Internal tooth anatomy and root canal instrumentation. The Root Canal Anatomy in Permanent Dentition (pp. 277–302). 1st edn. Springer: Cham. 2019.

[8] Schäfer E. Shaping ability of Hero 642 rotary nickel-titanium instruments and stainless steel hand K-Flexofiles in simulated curved root canals. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology. 2001; 92: 215–220.

[9] Sharma P, Kurthukoti AJ, Swamy DF, Shashidara R, Swamy EB. Computed tomographic morphometry of the internal anatomy of mandibular second primary molars. International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2015; 8: 202–207.

[10] Ferreira F, Adeodato C, Barbosa I, Aboud L, Scelza P, Zaccaro Scelza M. Movement kinematics and cyclic fatigue of NiTi rotary instruments: a systematic review. International Endodontic Journal. 2017; 50: 143–152.

[11] Shilpi T, Parimala K, Singh T, Barkha C. Literature review on rotary endodontics in primary teeth. SRM Journal of Research in Dental Sciences. 2021; 12: 95.

[12] Fu M, Zhang Z, Hou B. Removal of broken files from root canals by using ultrasonic techniques combined with dental microscope: a retrospective analysis of treatment outcome. Journal of Endodontics. 2011; 37: 619–622.

[13] Jonker C, Van der Vyver PJ. Factors influencing the life span of modern root canal instruments-a literature review. South African Dental Journal. 2013; 68: 14–23.

[14] Plotino G, Grande NM, Cordaro M, Testarelli L, Gambarini G. A review of cyclic fatigue testing of Nickel-Titanium rotary instruments. Journal of Endodontics. 2009; 35: 1469–1476.

[15] Parashos P, Messer HH. Rotary NiTi instrument fracture and its consequences. Journal of Endodontics. 2006; 32: 1031–1043.

[16] Oh S, Kim TH, Chang SW. Mechanical properties of NiTi rotary files fabricated through Gold-Wire, CM-Wire, T-Wire, and R-Phase heat treatment. Applied Sciences. 2023; 13: 3604.

[17] Puleio F, Beauty U, Torre A, Giordano F, Lo Giudice G. Apical transportation of apical foramen by different NiTi alloy systems: a systematic review. Applied Sciences. 2023; 13: 10555.

[18] Ashkar I, Sanz JL, Forner L. Cyclic fatigue resistance of glide path rotary files: a systematic review of in vitro studies. Materials. 2022; 15: 6662.

[19] Fanta Dental AF Baby File Brochure. 2021. Available at: https://www.fanta-dental.com/Rotary/29.html (Accessed: 15 January 2023).

[20] Denjoy I3 Gold Brochure. 2021. Available at: https://www.denjoy.cn/happy-children-s-day-to-all.html (Accessed: 12 December 2022).

[21] Pruett JP, Clement DJ, Carnes DL. Cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. Journal of Endodontics. 1997; 23: 77–85.

[22] Shah H, Patil V, Kamath A, Mathur A. Comparative evaluation of instrumentation time, obturation time, and radiographic quality of obturation using two rotary systems and manual technique for primary molar pulpectomies—in vivo study. Contemporary Clinical Dentistry. 2021; 12: 55.

[23] Bugra O, Akgun OMA. Comparison of Ni-Ti rotary and hand files instrumentation in primary molars. Journal of International Dental and Medical Research. 2013; 6: 6–8.

[24] Crespo S, Cortes O, Garcia C, Perez L. Comparison between rotary and manual instrumentation in primary teeth. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2008; 32: 295–298.

[25] Sattapan B, Nervo GJ, Palamara JEA, Messer HH. Defects in rotary nickel-titanium files after clinical use. Journal of Endodontics. 2000; 26: 161–165.

[26] Hülsmann M, Donnermeyer D, Schäfer E. A critical appraisal of studies on cyclic fatigue resistance of engine‐driven endodontic instruments. International Endodontic Journal. 2019; 52: 1427–1445.

[27] Rubio J, Zarzosa J, Aranda S, Casino A, Pallarés A. A comparative study of cyclic fatigue of 6 endodontic systems. An in vitro study. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry. 2022; 14: e560–e565.

[28] Shen Y, Peng B, Cheung GS. Factors associated with the removal of fractured NiTi instruments from root canal systems. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology. 2004; 98: 605–610.

[29] Hulsmann M, Schinkel I. Influence of several factors on the success or failure of removal of fractured instruments from the root canal. Dental Traumatology. 1999; 15: 252–258.

[30] Puleio F, Lo Giudice G, Militi A, Bellezza U, Lo Giudice R. Does low-taper root canal shaping decrease the risk of root fracture? A systematic review. Dentistry Journal. 2022; 10: 94.

[31] Shen Y, Qian W, Abtin H, Gao Y, Haapasalo M. Fatigue testing of controlled memory wire Nickel-Titanium rotary instruments. Journal of Endodontics. 2011; 37: 997–1001.

[32] Zinelis S, Eliades T, Eliades G. A metallurgical characterization of ten endodontic Ni‐Ti instruments: assessing the clinical relevance of shape memory and superelastic properties of Ni‐Ti endodontic instruments. International Endodontic Journal. 2010; 43: 125–134.

[33] Testarelli L, Plotino G, Al-Sudani D, Vincenzi V, Giansiracusa A, Grande NM, et al. Bending properties of a new nickel-titanium alloy with a lower percent by weight of nickel. Journal of Endodontics. 2011; 37: 1293–1295.

[34] Hou X, Yahata Y, Hayashi Y, Ebihara A, Hanawa T, Suda H. Phase transformation behaviour and bending property of twisted nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. International Endodontic Journal. 2011; 44: 253–258.