Evaluation of nanohardness, elastic modulus, and surface roughness of fluoride-releasing tooth colored restorative materials

Recently, interest in tooth-colored fluoride-releasing dental materials has increased. Although physical and mechanical properties such as surface hardness, elastic modulus and surface roughness of the restorative materials have been investigated, the effect of different immersion media on these properties is still controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the nanohardness, elastic modulus and surface roughness of the fluoride release of tooth-colored restorative materials after immersion in acidic beverages. Prepared samples of three restorative materials (a highly viscous glass ionomer (EQUIA Forte; GC, Tokyo, Japan), a compomer (Dyract XP; Dentsply, Weybridge, UK), and a bioactive restorative material (Activa BioACTIVE; Pulpdent, MA, USA)) were randomly divided and immersed in distilled water, a cola and an orange juice for one week. The HYSITRON T1 950 TriboIndenter device (Hysitron, USA) with the Berkovich diamond indenter tip was used for all measurements. The nanohardness and elastic modulus of the samples were measured by applying a force of 6000 µN to five different points on the sample surface. Surface roughness measurements were evaluated on random samples by scanning five random 40 × 40 µm areas. The properties were measured at the initial and one week after immersion. The values of nanohardness, elastic modulus and surface roughness were tested for significant differences using a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with repeated measures (p < 0.05). Tukey’s honest significant difference (HSD) test was used for multiple comparisons. AB (Activa BioACTIVE) had the highest initial mean values for nanohardness. After post-immersion, the highest mean value for elastic modulus was the initial AB value. The lowest mean value for roughness of 100.36 nm was obtained for the initial DX (Dyract XP) measurement. Acidic beverages had a negative effect on the nanohardness, elastic modulus and surface roughness of the restorative materials.

Fluoride releasing restorative material; Nanohardness; Elastic modulus; Surface roughness

[1] Patano A, Malcangi G, De Santis M, Morolla R, Settanni V, Piras F, et al. Conservative treatment of dental non-carious cervical lesions: a scoping review. Biomedicines. 2023; 11: 1530.

[2] Bekmezoglu EZ, Erken Gungor O, Karayilmaz H. Restorative materials in pediatric dentistry and the place of glass carbomer. 7tepe Klinik. 2019; 15: 359–365. (In Turkish)

[3] Mungara J, Philip J, Joseph E, Rajendran S, Elangovan A, Selvaraju G, et al. Comparative evaluation of fluoride release and recharge of pre-reacted glass ionomer composite and nano-ionomeric glass ionomer with daily fluoride exposure: an in vitro study. Journal of the Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry. 2013; 31: 234–239.

[4] Ching HS, Luddin N, Kannan TP, Ab Rahman I, Abdul Ghani NRN. Modification of glass ionomer cements on their physical-mechanical and antimicrobial properties. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 2018; 30: 557–571.

[5] Kurinji Amalavathy R, Sahoo HS, Shivanna S, Lingaraj J, Aravinthan S. Staining effect of various beverages on and surface nano-hardness of a resin coated and a non-coated fluoride releasing tooth-coloured restorative material: an in-vitro study. Heliyon. 2020; 6: e04345.

[6] Todor L, Bonta DF, Ciavoi G, Lile IE, Gag OS, Borcan F, et al. Clinical behavior of dental restorations made with compomers, comparing with composite and glass ionomers. Materiale Plastice. 2022; 59: 138–147.

[7] Hugar SM, Kohli D, Badakar CM, Vyavahare SS, Shah PP, Gokhale NS, et al. Compative assessment of conventional composite and coloured compomers in permanent molars of children with mixed dentition: a pilot study. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2017; 11: ZC69–ZC72.

[8] Choi JW, Lee MJ, Oh SH, Kim KM. Changes in the physical properties and color stability of aesthetic restorative materials caused by various beverages. Dental Materials Journal. 2019; 38: 33–40.

[9] Sajini S, Mushayt A, Almutairi T, Abuljadayel R. Color stability of bioactive restorative materials after immersion in various media. Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry. 2022; 12: 418–425.

[10] Cosgun A, Bolgul B, Duran N. In vitro investigation of antimicrobial effects, nanohardness, and cytotoxicity of different glass ionomer restorative materials in dentistry. Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice. 2019; 22: 422–431.

[11] Alharbi N, Teerakanok S, Satterthwaite JD, Giordano R, Silikas N. Quantitative nano-mechanical mapping AFM-based method for elastic modulus and surface roughness measurements of model polymer infiltrated ceramics. Dental Materials. 2022; 38: 935–945.

[12] Han L, Okamoto A, Fukushima M, Okiji T. Evaluation of flowable resin composite surfaces eroded by acidic and alcoholic drinks. Dental Materials Journal. 2008; 27: 455–465.

[13] El Deeb M. Hardness and nano-indentation. Biomaterials Journal. 2022; 1: 1–7.

[14] Drummond JL. Nanoindentation of dental composites. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. 2006; 78: 27–34.

[15] Nayyer M, Zahid S, Hassan SH, Mian SA, Mehmood S, Khan HA, et al. Comparative abrasive wear resistance and surface analysis of dental resin-based materials. European Journal of Dentistry. 2018; 12: 57–66.

[16] Kasraei S, Haghi S, Farzad A, Malek M, Nejadkarimi S. Comparative of flexural strength, hardness, and fluoride release of two bioactive restorative materials with RMGI and composite resin. Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences. 2022; 21: e225263.

[17] Garoushi S, Vallittu PK, Lassila L. Characterization of fluoride releasing restorative dental materials. Dental Materials Journal. 2018; 37: 293–300.

[18] Ünal M, Candan M, İpek İ, Küçükoflaz M, Özer A. Evaluation of the microhardness of different resin-based dental restorative materials treated with gastric acid: scanning electron microscopy–energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy analysis. Microscopy Research and Technique. 2021; 84: 2140–2148.

[19] Sideridou ID, Karabela MM, Bikiaris DN. Aging studies of light cured dimethacrylate-based dental resins and a resin composite in water or ethanol/water. Dental Materials. 2007; 23: 1142–1149.

[20] Peskersoy C, Culha O. Comparative evaluation of mechanical properties of dental nanomaterials. Journal of Nanomaterials. 2017; 2017: 6171578.

[21] Inagaki LT, Dainezi VB, Alonso RC, Paula AB, Garcia-Godoy F, Puppin-Rontani RM, et al. Evaluation of sorption/solubility, softening, flexural strength and elastic modulus of experimental resin blends with chlorhexidine. Journal of Dentistry. 2016; 49: 40–45.

[22] Lan H, Venkatesh TA. On the relationships between hardness and the elastic and plastic properties of isotropic power-law hardening materials. Philosophical Magazine. 2014; 94: 35–55.

[23] Thomaidis S, Kakaboura A, Mueller WD, Zinelis S. Mechanical properties of contemporary composite resins and their interrelations. Dental Materials. 2013; 29: e132–e141.

[24] Issa Y, Watts DC, Boyd D, Price RB. Effect of curing light emission spectrum on the nanohardness and elastic modulus of two bulk-fill resin composites. Dental Materials. 2016; 32: 535–550.

[25] Lepri CP, Palma-Dibb RG. Surface roughness and color change of a composite: Influence of beverages and brushing. Dental Materials Journal. 2012; 31: 689–696.

[26] Nasim I, Neelakantan P, Sujeer R, Subbarao CV. Color Stability of Microfilled, Microhybrid and Nanocomposite resins—An in Vitro Study. J Dent. 2010; 38: 137–142.

[27] Ortengren U, Andersson F, Elgh U, Terselius B, Karlsson S. Influence of pH and storage time on the sorption and solubility behavior of three composite resin materials. Journal of Dentistry. 2001; 29: 35–41.

[28] Tuncer D, Karaman E, Firat E. Does the temperature of beverages affect the surface roughness, hardness, and color stability of a composite resin? European Journal of Dentistry. 2013; 07: 165–171.

[29] Boing TF, de Geus JL, Wambier LM, Loguercio AD, Reis A, Mongruel Gomes OM. Are glass-ionomer cement restorations in cervical lesions more long-lasting than resin-based composite resins? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2018; 20: 435–452.

[30] Savas S, Colgecen O, Yasa B, Kucukyilmaz E. Color stability, roughness, and water sorption/solubility of glass ionomer-based restorative materials. Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice. 2019; 22: 824–832.

[31] Kazak M, Koymen SS, Yurdan R, Tekdemir K, Donmez N. Effect of thermal aging procedure on the microhardness and surface roughness of fluoride containing materials. Annals of Medical Research. 2021; 27: 888–894.

[32] Bayrak GD, Dosdogru EY, Oztürk D. The effect of surface coating agent on the surface roughness of restorative materials exposed to acidulated phosphate. Journal of Dentistry Faculty Atatürk University. 2020; 30: 557–563.