Clinical application of Er:YAG laser and traditional dental turbine in caries removal in children

This study compares the clinical efficacy of erbium-doped:yttrium-aluminium-garnet (Er:YAG) laser and traditional dental turbine in caries removal in children. The study cohort comprised 78 children aged 5 to 10 years with caries in two symmetrical maxillary molars. Different carious sides of the same child were randomly divided into control and observed sides. For each child, the caries on the control side were treated with a traditional dental turbine, while the observed side was treated with an Er:YAG laser. The study evaluated the use of anesthetics, pain levels, tooth hypersensitivity and the occurrence and severity of tooth fractures during caries removal with different methods. Additionally, the clinical anxiety and cooperative behavior of the children were observed. The time required for caries removal and cavity preparation by both methods was recorded, and the success rate of treatment was assessed after one year of follow-up. The results indicated a significant reduction in the use of anesthetics, pain and the incidence and severity of tooth hypersensitivity with the use of Er:YAG laser (p < 0.05). No significant difference was found in the occurrence of tooth fractures between the two groups (p > 0.05). The children treated with Er:YAG laser demonstrated better clinical anxiety levels and cooperative behavior. However, the time required for cavity preparation was longer with the use of Er:YAG laser (p < 0.05). After a 12-month follow-up, there was no significant difference in the success rate of treatment between the two groups (p > 0.05). In conclusion, compared to the traditional dental turbine, the use of Er:YAG laser improves treatment comfort and cooperation in children with caries and reduces the need for intraoperative anesthetics.

Dental caries; Er:YAG laser; Dental turbine

[1] Kazeminia M, Abdi A, Shohaimi S, Jalali R, Vaisi-Raygani A, Salari N, et al. Dental caries in primary and permanent teeth in children's worldwide, 1995 to 2019: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Head & Face Medicine. 2020; 16: 22.

[2] Corrêa-Faria P, Viana KA, Raggio DP, Hosey MT, Costa LR. Recommended procedures for the management of early childhood caries lesions—a scoping review by the Children Experiencing Dental Anxiety: Collaboration on Research and Education (CEDACORE). BMC Oral Health. 2020; 20: 75.

[3] Turton B, Sullivan S, Chher T, Hak S, Sokal-Gutierrez K, Wieringa F, et al. Caries incidence is associated with wasting among cambodian children. Journal of Dental Research. 2023; 102: 157–163.

[4] Jardim JJ, Mestrinho HD, Koppe B, de Paula LM, Alves LS, Yamaguti PM, et al. Restorations after selective caries removal: 5-year randomized trial. Journal of Dentistry. 2020; 99: 103416.

[5] Cardoso M, Coelho A, Lima R, Amaro I, Paula A, Marto CM, et al. Efficacy and patient’s acceptance of alternative methods for caries removal—a systematic review. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2020; 9: 3407.

[6] Abed R, Bernabe E, Sabbah W. Family impacts of severe dental caries among children in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2019; 17: 109–118.

[7] Zambrano-Achig P, Viteri-García A, Verdugo-Paiva F. Chemo-mechanical removal versus conventional removal for deep caries lesion. Medwave. 2022; 22: e8320.

[8] Chevalier V, Le Fur Bonnabesse A, Duncan HF. Frightened of the pulp? A qualitative analysis of undergraduate student confidence and stress during the management of deep caries and the exposed pulp. International Endodontic Journal. 2021; 54: 130–146.

[9] Urs P, Smitha S, Abinaya R, Janani J. Comparing the efficacy of three minimally invasive techniques on demineralized dentin in primary teeth and evaluating its residual dentin and microhardness levels: an in vitro study. International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2021; 13: 585–589.

[10] Sinha A, Osnes C, Keeling AJ. Pilot study assessing 3D-printed teeth as a caries removal teaching tool. European Journal of Dental Education. 2022; 26: 329–336.

[11] Curylofo-Zotti FA, Fernandes MP, Martins AA, Macedo AP, Nogueira LFB, Ramos AP, et al. Caries removal with Er:YAG laser followed by dentin biomodification with carbodiimide and chitosan: Wettability and surface morphology analysis. Microscopy Research and Technique. 2020; 83: 133–139.

[12] Valério RA, Galo R, Galafassi D, Corona SAM, Borsatto MC. Four-year clinical prospective follow-up of resin composite restoration after selective caries removal using Er:YAG laser. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2020; 24: 2271–2283.

[13] Belcheva A, Shindova M. Efficiency of ER:YAG laser therapy in combination with behaviour management technique in reducing anxiety among paediatric dental patients—a study protocol for a randomised clinical trial. BMJ Open. 2022; 12: e054523.

[14] Zhou F, Zhang S, Ma W, Xiao Y, Wang D, Zeng S, et al. The long-term effect of dental treatment under general anaesthesia or physical restraints on children’s dental anxiety and behaviour. European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2022; 23: 27–32.

[15] Clarkson JE, Ramsay CR, Ricketts D, Banerjee A, Deery C, Lamont T, et al. Selective Caries Removal in Permanent Teeth (SCRiPT) for the treatment of deep carious lesions: a randomised controlled clinical trial in primary care. BMC Oral Health. 2021; 21: 336.

[16] Melo L, Blum IR, Foxton RM. Should new operating procedures arising from COVID-19 make us re-think our management of deep caries? Primary Dental Journal. 2022; 11: 72–74.

[17] Lee W, Kwon HB. Vibroacoustic analysis of dental air turbine noise. BDJ Open. 2022; 8: 27.

[18] Liebich T, Lack L, Hansen K, Zajamšek B, Lovato N, Catcheside P, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of wind turbine noise effects on sleep using validated objective and subjective sleep assessments. Journal of Sleep Research. 2021; 30: e13228.

[19] Gibbison R, Crozier R. Are RMGIC restorations as effective with or without selective caries removal in primary molars? Evidence-Based Dentistry. 2021; 22: 132–133.

[20] Alkhouli MM, Al Nesser SF, Bshara NG, AlMidani AN, Comisi JC. Comparing the efficacies of two chemo-mechanical caries removal agents (2.25% sodium hypochlorite gel and brix 3000), in caries removal and patient cooperation: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Journal of Dentistry. 2020; 93: 103280.

[21] Fried WA, Chan KH, Darling CL, Curtis DA, Fried D. Image-guided ablation of dental calculus from root surfaces using a DPSS Er:YAG laser. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. 2020; 52: 247–258.

[22] Lopes MS, Pereira DL, de Oliveira Mota CCB, Amaral MM, Zezell DM, Gomes ASL. The lingual enamel morphology and bracket shear bond strength influenced by Nd:YAG laser and aluminum oxide sandblasting preconditioning. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2021; 25: 1151–1158.

[23] Grzech-Leśniak K, Matys J. The effect of Er:YAG lasers on the reduction of aerosol formation for dental workers. Materials. 2021; 14: 2857.

[24] Li T, Zhang X, Shi H, Ma Z, Lv B, Xie M. Er:YAG laser application in caries removal and cavity preparation in children: a meta-analysis. Lasers in Medical Science. 2019; 34: 273–280.

[25] Xiong Z, Tu S, Jiang L, Cheng T, Jiang H. Effect of nanosecond- and microsecond-pulse Er,Cr:YSGG laser ablation on dentin shear bond strength of universal adhesives. Lasers in Medical Science. 2022; 37: 3285–3290.

[26] Kermanshah H, Ranjbar Omrani L, Ghabraei S, Fekrazad R, Daneshparvar N, Bagheri P. Direct pulp capping with ProRoot MTA alone and in combination with Er:YAG laser irradiation: a clinical trial. Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences. 2020; 11: S60–S66.

[27] Curylofo-Zotti FA, Oliveira VC, Marchesin AR, Borges HS, Tedesco AC, Corona SAM. In vitro antibacterial activity of green tea-loaded chitosan nanoparticles on caries-related microorganisms and dentin after Er:YAG laser caries removal. Lasers in Medical Science. 2023; 38: 50.

[28] Li T, Zhang X, Shi H, Ma Z, Lv B, Xie M. Er:YAG laser application in caries removal and cavity preparation in children: a meta-analysis. Lasers in Medical Science. 2019; 34: 273–280.

[29] Petričević GK, Katić M, Anić I, Salarić I, Vražić D, Bago I. Efficacy of different Er:YAG laser-activated photoacoustic streaming modes compared to passive ultrasonic irrigation in the retreatment of curved root canals. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2022; 26: 6773–6781.

[30] Souza-Filho CB, Moris ICM, Colucci V, Faria ACL, Gomes ÉA. Is the Er:YAG laser affect the surface characteristics and bond strength of Y-TZP? Brazilian Dental Journal. 2021; 32: 83–92.