Sex differences in craniofacial parameters of children and adolescents: a comparative study with the maturation of cervical vertebrae using a cephalometric method

This study aimed to investigate sex differences in craniomaxillofacial parameters in children and adolescents. Lateral cephalograms were obtained from 340 subjects (141 male, 199 female) aged 6 to 18 years, and their craniofacial characteristics and cervical vertebral maturity were assessed using the quantitative cervical vertebral maturity (QCVM) method. Age-based stratified analyses on craniofacial parameters and further comparison in QCVM Ⅲ subjects were performed. Among all analyses, male subjects had significantly greater value than females in sex-different parameters except for facial convexity. The overall group had 17 sex-different parameters (ramus height, anterior facial height (AFH), posterior facial height (PFH), upper anterior facial height (UAFH), lower anterior facial height (LAFH), anterior cranial base length, posterior cranial base length, facial convexity, upper lip length, upper lip thickness, lower lip thickness, soft tissue chin thickness, nasion of soft tissue-subnasale (N’-Sn), subnasale-menton of soft tissue (Sn-Me’), subnasale-stomion inferius (Sn-Sto)). The <12 years old group showed 6 significant sex differences (AFH, LAFH, lower lip protrusion, lower lip thickness, N’-Sn, Sn-Me’). While the ≥12 years old group occurred two more parameters (mandibular body length, AFH/PFH) than the overall group. 12 cephalometric parameters had significant sex differences among QCMV III patients. After age adjustment, the number of sex-different parameters only increased in soft tissue. Craniofacial characteristics and cervical vertebrae maturation of the youngsters exhibited significant sex differences. Though females reached an earlier cervical vertebral maturation, they still had smaller craniofacial linear features. Sex differences should be taken into account in developing reference standards for cephalometric measurements and treatment planning in the clinic.

Cephalometric; Craniofacial; Sex; Orthodontics

[1] Borra VM, Steenackers E, de Freitas F, Van Hul E, Glass I, Van Hul W. Localization of the gene for X-linked calvarial hyperostosis to chromosome Xq27.3–Xqter. Bone. 2014; 58: 67–71.

[2] Feng H, Tian Y, Zhang H, Zhang H, Wang Z, Jia T, et al. Bone age and serum osteocalcin levels in children with obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome before and after adenotonsillectomy. American Journal of Therapeutics. 2017; 24: e189–e195.

[3] Hermanussen M, Meitinger T, Veldhuis JD, Low MJ, Pfäffle R, Staub K, et al. Adolescent growth: genes, hormones and the peer group. Proceedings of the 20th Aschauer soiree, held at Glücksburg castle, Germany, 15th to 17th November 2013. Pediatric Endocrinology Reviews. 2014; 11: 341–353.

[4] Mehta O, Gupta D. A study of cephalometric appraisal of the inheritance of craniofacial pattern in Gorkhas. Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry. 2008; 26: 121.

[5] Xiao C, Wan Y, Yan Z, Li Y, Fan P, Cheng Q, et al. Do specific craniomaxillofacial features correlate with psychological distress in adult pretreatment orthodontic patients? A cephalometric study. Disease Markers. 2022; 2022: 9694413.

[6] Sutherland K, Phillips CL, Yee BJ, Grunstein RR, Cistulli PA. Maxillomandibular volume influences the relationship between weight loss and improvement in obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep. 2016; 39: 43–49.

[7] Yan Z, Wan Y, Xiao C, Li Y, Zhang Y, An Y, et al. Craniofacial morphology of orthodontic patients with and without temporomandibular disorders: a cross-sectional study. Pain Research and Management. 2022; 2022: 9344028.

[8] Taner L, Gürsoy GM, Uzuner FD. Does gender have an effect on craniofacial measurements? Turkish Journal of Orthodontics. 2019; 32: 59–64.

[9] Baccetti T, Reyes BC, McNamara JA Jr. Gender differences in Class III malocclusion. The Angle orthodontist. 2005; 75: 510–520.

[10] Avci S, Ergun T, Aydin E, Kansu L. Sex differences in adult craniofacial parameters. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy. 2015; 37: 1069–1078.

[11] Gilli G. The assessment of skeletal maturation. Hormone Research. 1996; 45: 49–52.

[12] Hägg U, Taranger J. Skeletal stages of the hand and wrist as indicators of the pubertal growth spurt. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 1980; 38: 187–200.

[13] Santiago RC, de Miranda Costa LF, Vitral RWF, Fraga MR, Bolognese AM, Maia LC. Cervical vertebral maturation as a biologic indicator of skeletal maturity. The Angle Orthodontist. 2012; 82: 1123–1131.

[14] Szemraj A, Wojtaszek-Słomińska A, Racka-Pilszak B. Is the cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method effective enough to replace the hand-wrist maturation (HWM) method in determining skeletal maturation?—A systematic review. European Journal of Radiology. 2018; 102: 125–128.

[15] Chen L, Xu T, Jiang J, Zhang X, Lin J. Quantitative cervical vertebral maturation assessment in adolescents with normal occlusion: a mixed longitudinal study. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2008; 134: 720.e1–720.e7.

[16] Chan GK. A cephalometric appraisal of the Chinese (Cantonese). American Journal of Orthodontics. 1972; 61: 279–285.

[17] Cooke MS, Wei HY. Cephalometric standards for the southern Chinese. The European Journal of Orthodontics. 1988; 10: 264–272.

[18] Daraze A, Delatte M, Liistro G, Majzoub Z. Cephalometrics of pharyngeal airway space in Lebanese adults. International Journal of Dentistry. 2017; 2017: 3959456.

[19] Kimmerle EH, Ross A, Slice D. Sexual dimorphism in America: geometric morphometric analysis of the craniofacial region*. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2008; 53: 54–57.

[20] Zajitschek SR, Zajitschek F, Bonduriansky R, Brooks RC, Cornwell W, Falster DS, et al. Sexual dimorphism in trait variability and its eco-evolutionary and statistical implications. eLife. 2020; 9: e63170.

[21] Yeong P. Morphology of Singapore Chinese. The European Journal of Orthodontics. 2004; 26: 605–612.

[22] Aurizanti D, Suryonegoro H, Priaminiarti M. Comparison of craniofacial linear measurements of 20–40 year-old males and females using digital lateral cephalometric radiography in Indonesia. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2017; 884: 012046.

[23] Magalhães MI, Machado V, Mascarenhas P, Botelho J, Mendes JJ, Delgado AS. Chronological age range estimation of cervical vertebral maturation using Baccetti method: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Orthodontics. 2022; 44: 548–555.