Criteria for early diagnosis of congenitally missing second premolars based on the calcification grades of other permanent posterior teeth: a retrospective study

Diagnosing congenitally missing second premolars (SPs) in early childhood is challenging due to variations in their calcification ages. In this study, we investigated the correlation between calcification grades of SPs and other permanent posterior teeth to aid clinicians in the early diagnosis of congenitally missing SPs. This cohort study retrospectively evaluated 6813 images from 9261 panoramic image records of children aged 42–78 months. The Nolla method was used to score calcification grades of first and SP and first and second permanent molars. Images were divided into 6 subgroups based on age with six-month intervals, and average calcification grades of teeth were analyzed by gender and categorized. The calcification grades of these relevant teeth were separately analyzed, specifically for Grade 0 and Grade 1 for SPs. Gender-based analysis revealed statistically significant differences in the calcification grades of 4 first premolars, 4 permanent first molars, and 2 permanent second molars. However, these differences were not significant for all 4 SPs and teeth numbered 17 and 27 between genders. Generally, Nolla grades were higher in girls compared to boys, except for all 4 SPs and tooth numbered 46. Furthermore, higher Nolla grades were observed in older age groups, which was consistent with expectations. The variability in calcification grades of SPs highlights the importance of understanding the calcification grades of other permanent teeth, which are more clearly visible on radiological images of young children. This knowledge could help clinicians in assessing the dental maturity of pediatric patients and facilitate early diagnosis of congenitally missing teeth.

Congenitally missing teeth; Second premolars; Children; Nolla method; Calcification grades

[1] Duke A, Paterson M, P Ashley M, MacNab L. The genetic basis of hypodontia in dental development. British Dental Journal. 2023; 235: 525–528.

[2] Lee S, Ahn H, Kim H, Lee K, Kim S, Lee JH. Identification of potential key variants in mandibular premolar hypodontia through whole-exome sequencing. Frontiers in Genetics. 2023; 14: 1248326.

[3] Meade MJ, Dreyer CW. Tooth agenesis: an overview of diagnosis, aetiology and management. Japanese Dental Science Review. 2023; 59: 209–218.

[4] Bjelopavlovic M, Reder SR, Fritzen I, Brockmann MA, Hardt J, Petrowski K. Forensic age estimation: a multifactorial approach in a retrospective population study. Diagnostics. 2023; 13: 2029.

[5] Kim YH. Investigation of hypodontia as clinically related dental anomaly: prevalence and characteristics. ISRN Dentistry. 2011; 2011: 246135.

[6] Ravn JJ, Nielsen HG. A longitudinal radiographic study of the mineralization of 2nd premolars. European Journal of Oral Sciences. 1977; 85: 232–236.

[7] Nielsen HG, Ravn JJ. A radiographic study of mineralization of permanent teeth in a group of children aged 3–7 years. European Journal of Oral Sciences. 1976; 84: 109–118.

[8] Han M, Jia S, Wang C, Chu G, Chen T, Zhou H, et al. Accuracy of the Demirjian, Willems and Nolla methods for dental age estimation in a northern Chinese population. Archives of Oral Biology. 2020; 118: 104875.

[9] Martínez Gutiérrez VM, Ortega-Pertuz AI. Comparison of Nolla, Demirjian and Moorrees methods for dental age calculation for forensic purposes. Revista OdontolóGica Mexicana. 2017; 21: 155–164.

[10] Fekonja A. Evaluation of the eruption of permanent teeth and their association with malocclusion. Clinical and Experimental Dental Research. 2022; 8: 836–842.

[11] Vandana S, Muthu MS, Akila G, Anusha M, Kandaswamy D, Aswath Narayanan MB. Global variations in eruption chronology of permanent teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. To be published in American Journal of Human Biology. 2024. [Preprint].

[12] Kühnisch J, Anttonen V, Duggal MS, Spyridonos ML, Rajasekharan S, Sobczak M, et al. Best clinical practice guidance for prescribing dental radiographs in children and adolescents: an EAPD policy document. European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry. 2020; 21: 375–386.

[13] Duruk G, Gündogdu Özdal T, Duman S. Accuracy of age estimation with Demirjian and Nolla methods in Eastern Turkish children aged 3–17 years old. European Oral Research. 2022; 56: 80–87.

[14] Altunsoy M, Nur BG, Akkemik O, Ok E, Evcil MS. Applicability of the Demirjian method for dental age estimation in western Turkish children. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 2015; 73: 121–125.

[15] Celikoglu M, Cantekin K, Ceylan I. Dental age assessment: the applicability of Demirjian method in Eastern Turkish children. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2011; 56: S220–S222.

[16] Hato E, Coşgun A, Altan H. Comperative evaluation of Nolla, Willems and Cameriere methods for age estimation of Turkish children in the Central Black Sea Region: a preliminary study. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine. 2022; 91: 102400.

[17] Goya HA, Tanaka S, Maeda T, Akimoto Y. An orthopantomographic study of hypodontia in permanent teeth of Japanese pediatric patients. Journal of Oral Science. 2008; 50: 143–150.

[18] Sheikhi M, Sadeghi MA, Ghorbanizadeh S. Prevalence of congenitally missing permanent teeth in Iran. Dental Research Journal. 2012; 9: 105–111.

[19] Gokkaya B, Kargul B. Prevalence of concomitant hypo-hyperdontia in a group of Turkish orthodontic patients. European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry. 2016; 17: 53–57.

[20] Vahid-Dastjerdi E, Borzabadi-Farahani A, Mahdian M, Amini N. Non-syndromic hypodontia in an Iranian orthodontic population. Journal of Oral Science. 2010; 52: 455–461.

[21] Mayfitriana Z, Suwargiani AA, Setiawan AS. Growth stunting prevention in Indonesia: dentist knowledge and perception. European Journal of Dentistry. 2023; 17: 642–648.

[22] Rune B, Sarnas KV. Tooth size and tooth formation in children with advanced hypodontia. The Angle Orthodontist. 1974; 44: 316–321.